Literature DB >> 27575586

The Utrecht questionnaire (U-CEP) measuring knowledge on clinical epidemiology proved to be valid.

Marlous F Kortekaas1, Marie-Louise E L Bartelink2, Esther de Groot2, Helen Korving2, Niek J de Wit2, Diederick E Grobbee2, Arno W Hoes2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Knowledge on clinical epidemiology is crucial to practice evidence-based medicine. We describe the development and validation of the Utrecht questionnaire on knowledge on Clinical epidemiology for Evidence-based Practice (U-CEP); an assessment tool to be used in the training of clinicians. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The U-CEP was developed in two formats: two sets of 25 questions and a combined set of 50. The validation was performed among postgraduate general practice (GP) trainees, hospital trainees, GP supervisors, and experts. Internal consistency, internal reliability (item-total correlation), item discrimination index, item difficulty, content validity, construct validity, responsiveness, test-retest reliability, and feasibility were assessed. The questionnaire was externally validated.
RESULTS: Internal consistency was good with a Cronbach alpha of 0.8. The median item-total correlation and mean item discrimination index were satisfactory. Both sets were perceived as relevant to clinical practice. Construct validity was good. Both sets were responsive but failed on test-retest reliability. One set took 24 minutes and the other 33 minutes to complete, on average. External GP trainees had comparable results.
CONCLUSION: The U-CEP is a valid questionnaire to assess knowledge on clinical epidemiology, which is a prerequisite for practicing evidence-based medicine in daily clinical practice.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Assessment; Clinical epidemiology; Evidence-based medicine; Knowledge; Questionnaire; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27575586     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured.

Authors:  Loai Albarqouni; Tammy Hoffmann; Paul Glasziou
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  How to choose an evidence-based medicine knowledge test for medical students? Comparison of three knowledge measures.

Authors:  Ivan Buljan; Ana Jerončić; Mario Malički; Matko Marušić; Ana Marušić
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Does integrated training in evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the general practice (GP) specialty training improve EBM behaviour in daily clinical practice? A cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M F Kortekaas; M E L Bartelink; N P A Zuithoff; G J M G van der Heijden; N J de Wit; A W Hoes
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Adaptation and validation of the Berlin questionnaire of competence in evidence-based dentistry for dental students: a pilot study.

Authors:  Laura Imorde; Andreas Möltner; Maren Runschke; Tobias Weberschock; Stefan Rüttermann; Susanne Gerhardt-Szép
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 3.263

5.  A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education.

Authors:  Bharathy Kumaravel; Jasmine Heath Hearn; Leila Jahangiri; Rachel Pollard; Claire J Stocker; David Nunan
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.