Literature DB >> 27574879

Health state utility values in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer by treatment line: a systematic review.

Noman Paracha1, Per-Olof Thuresson1, Santiago G Moreno2, Katherine S MacGilchrist3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: For patients with late-stage (metastatic) breast cancer, the impact of treatment on health-related quality of life is a key factor in decision-making. A systematic review was conducted to identify health state utility values (HSUVs) for late-stage breast cancer, derived using methods preferred by health technology assessment (HTA) agencies, by treatment line. The aim was to generate a list of HSUVs, that could help to justify the values used to populate cost-utility models. Areas covered: Ten electronic databases, international congress websites and online HSUV databases were searched (January 1995-May 2014) for HSUVs for adults with late-stage breast cancer that had been derived from methods favoured by HTA agencies. Publications were included only if they reported studies that originated HSUVs. Expert commentary: Large numbers of HSUVs are available for late-stage breast cancer in the published literature. Contrary to expectations, the HSUVs reported in the literature vary greatly for some health states. As a result, the choice of HSUV can have considerable implications for the outcomes of economic evaluations. Standardization of HSUV methodology is expected to reduce variability; however, further research is recommended for assessing the sensitivity of generic preference-based measures in late-stage (metastatic) breast cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced breast cancer; cost–utility analysis; health state utility; health status; metastatic breast cancer; quality of life; quality of life index; quality-adjusted life-year; systematic review; treatment line

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27574879     DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2016.1222907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res        ISSN: 1473-7167            Impact factor:   2.217


  10 in total

1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Second-Line Endocrine Therapies in Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-positive and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Verin Lertjanyakun; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk; Susumu Kunisawa; Yuichi Imanaka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Evaluating the conduct and application of health utility studies: a review of critical appraisal tools and reporting checklists.

Authors:  Michael J Zoratti; A Simon Pickard; Peep F M Stalmeier; Daniel Ollendorf; Andrew Lloyd; Kelvin K W Chan; Don Husereau; John E Brazier; Murray Krahn; Mitchell Levine; Lehana Thabane; Feng Xie
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-04-11

Review 3.  Research on the Economics of Cancer-Related Health Care: An Overview of the Review Literature.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Kaitlin Akif; Michael T Halpern
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  Combined cancer patient-reported symptom and health utility tool for routine clinical implementation: a real-world comparison of the ESAS and EQ-5D in multiple cancer sites.

Authors:  M Moskovitz; K Jao; J Su; M C Brown; H Naik; L Eng; T Wang; J Kuo; Y Leung; W Xu; N Mittmann; L Moody; L Barbera; G Devins; M Li; D Howell; G Liu
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Tailored Exercise Prescription for Women with Breast Cancer with 8-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Louisa G Gordon; Elizabeth G Eakin; Rosalind R Spence; Christopher Pyke; John Bashford; Christobel Saunders; Sandra C Hayes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Response to the letter to the editor.

Authors:  Antonio Olry de Labry Lima; Silvia Fénix-Caballero; Zuzana Spacírova; Emilio Jesús Alegre Del Rey
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.380

7.  Validation of the predictive accuracy of health-state utility values based on the Lloyd model for metastatic or recurrent breast cancer in Japan.

Authors:  Tsuguo Iwatani; Eisuke Inoue; Koichiro Tsugawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  Systematic review of health state utility values in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with a focus on previously treated patients.

Authors:  Noman Paracha; Ahmed Abdulla; Katherine S MacGilchrist
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Community- and Choice-Based Health State Utility Values for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Erik F Blom; Kevin Ten Haaf; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Local Treatment in Oligometastatic Disease.

Authors:  Dirk Mehrens; Marcus Unterrainer; Stefanie Corradini; Maximilian Niyazi; Farkhad Manapov; C Benedikt Westphalen; Matthias F Froelich; Moritz Wildgruber; Max Seidensticker; Jens Ricke; Johannes Rübenthaler; Wolfgang G Kunz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.