Literature DB >> 27574875

Higher Prostate Cancer Grade Groups Are Detected in Patients Undergoing Multiparametric MRI-targeted Biopsy Compared With Standard Biopsy.

Jennifer B Gordetsky1, John V Thomas, Jeffrey W Nix, Soroush Rais-Bahrami.   

Abstract

Recent studies have suggested that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) fusion-guided prostate biopsy can detect more clinically significant prostate cancers, which could impact patient management. As many of the studies evaluating MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy were conducted in specialized quaternary care centers, the question remains whether this technology is transferable to general practice. Our study assesses the diagnostic ability of MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy compared with standard biopsy in the new era of prostate cancer Grade Grouping. We reviewed our prostate biopsy database evaluating men who underwent MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy with concurrent standard 12-core extended-sextant biopsy. Patient demographics and pathologic findings were reviewed. All patient biopsies were performed by 1 of 2 urologic oncologists. Tumors were given a Grade Group for each biopsy based on the core with the highest grade in each case. A total of 191 patients underwent MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy with concurrent 12-core extended sextant biopsy, with a cancer detection rate of 56%. The average number of biopsy cores obtained via the targeted approach was significantly less than those obtained by standard biopsy, 4.8 cores versus 12 cores, respectively, P<0.001. There was no difference in cancer detection between targeted and standard biopsy, 41.4% and 49.2%, respectively, P=0.15. However, when comparing the 2 techniques, the degree of detection of ≥Grade Group 3 tumors significantly favored targeted biopsy over standard biopsy (P=0.009). MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy is equivalent to the standard-of-care 12-core biopsy in terms of cancer detection and superior in detecting higher grade disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27574875     DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000723

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  16 in total

Review 1.  Developing a National Center of Excellence for Prostate Imaging.

Authors:  Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Manuel Madariaga-Venegas; Nicolas Aviles; Juan Carlos Roman; Ivan Gallegos; Mauricio Burotto
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  How Would MRI-targeted Prostate Biopsy Alter Radiation Therapy Approaches in Treating Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Daniel B Dix; Andrew M McDonald; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; John V Thomas; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 3.  Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Janelle T West; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-06-21

4.  MRI/US fusion-guided prostate biopsy allows for equivalent cancer detection with significantly fewer needle cores in biopsy-naive men.

Authors:  Vidhush K Yarlagadda; Win Shun Lai; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Kristin K Porter; Jeffrey W Nix; John V Thomas; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

5.  PTEN and ERG detection in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted prostate biopsy compared to systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Erin Baumgartner; Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena; Marie-Lisa Eich; Kristin K Porter; Jeffrey W Nix; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Jennifer Gordetsky
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Histologic findings associated with false-positive multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging performed for prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Jennifer B Gordetsky; David Ullman; Luciana Schultz; Kristin K Porter; Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena; Carli E Calderone; Jeffrey W Nix; Michael Ullman; Sejong Bae; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 7.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward!

Authors:  Emanuel Darius Cata; Iulia Andras; Teodora Telecan; Attila Tamas-Szora; Radu-Tudor Coman; Dan-Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

8.  Prostate cancer management choices in patients undergoing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy compared to systematic biopsy.

Authors:  Jennifer B Gordetsky; Benjamin Saylor; Sejong Bae; Jeffrey W Nix; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 2.954

Review 9.  Co-registration of MRI and ultrasound: accuracy of targeting based on radiology-pathology correlation.

Authors:  Win Shun Lai; Jessica G Zarzour; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06

10.  DNA repair deregulation in discrete prostate cancer lesions identified on multi-parametric MRI and targeted by MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Caleb R Dulaney; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Debra Della Manna; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Jeffrey W Nix; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.