| Literature DB >> 27574677 |
Nitish Bhatia1, Gursharan Kaur1, Varinder Soni2, Juhi Kataria3, Ravi K Dhawan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the potential of isoquercetin-based cream formulation on scald burn wound injury in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Burn; Free radicals; Isoquercetin; Scald; Wound healing
Year: 2016 PMID: 27574677 PMCID: PMC4964293 DOI: 10.1186/s41038-016-0032-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Burns Trauma ISSN: 2321-3868
Effect of cream base, silver sulfadiazine (standard), and isoquercetin-based creams on percentage of wound contraction in various animal groups under study after scald burn injury in the period of 21 days
| Treatment groups | Percentage of wound contraction (mean ± standard deviations) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 11 | Day 21 | |
| Sham group | – | – | – |
| Burn injury group | 0 | 3 ± 0.21 | 13 ± 0.46 |
| Cream base-treated group | 0 | 5 ± 0.24 | 14 ± 0.38 |
| Silver sulfadiazine cream-treated group | 0 | 25a ± 1.23. | 55a ± 1.42 |
| 0.01 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 0 | 15a ± 0.94 | 30a ± 1.17 |
| 0.02 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 0 | 17a ± 1.54 | 34a ± 1.28 |
| 0.04 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 0 | 18a ± 1.62 | 42a ± 1.44 |
| 0.06 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 0 | 24a ± 1.72 | 51a ± 1.42 |
Results are represented as mean ± standard deviation
aSignificant change in the mean value as compared to the burn injury group with p < 0.05
Effect of different concentrations of isoquercetin-based creams on period of epithelialization after scald burn injury in a period of 21 days
| Treatment groups | Period of epithelialization in days (mean ± standard deviations) |
|---|---|
| Sham group | – |
| Burn injury group | 20.1 ± 0.54 |
| Cream base-treated group | 19.8 ± 0.48 |
| Silver sulfadiazine cream-treated group | 15.6 ± 0.44a |
| 0.01 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 16.4 ± 0.46a |
| 0.02 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 14.7 ± 0.42a |
| 0.04 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 12.3 ± 0.36a |
| 0.06 % isoquercetin cream-treated group | 10.8 ± 0.27a,b |
Results are represented as mean ± standard deviation
aSignificant change in the mean value as compared to the burn injury group with p < 0.05
bSignificant change in the mean value as compared to the silver sulfadiazine cream-treated group with p < 0.05
Fig. 1Representative histological slides of skin wound tissue of various groups on day 21 after burn injury. a Sham group with no histological changes; b burn injury group slide is characterized by incomplete formation of epithelial layer, inflammatory tissue damage, and edema; c cream base-treated group showing significant inflammatory damage and tissue edema; and d 0.01 % isoquercetin-based cream-treated group showing significant healing of burned tissue. The cellular structure of dermal layers has been restored. The signs of necrosis have been limited to most extent, and the tissue is devoid of any peri-vascular infiltration into tissue spaces. e 0.02 % isoquercetin-based cream-treated group showing more re-structuring and re-organizing of burned tissue. The process of tissue necrosis appears halted and tissue spaces less widened. f 0.04 % isoquercetin-based cream-treated group showing partial reformation of the epithelial layer with signs of tissue re-structuring and healing. g 0.06 % isoquercetin-based cream-treated group showing almost complete formation and healing of the epithelial layer. Moreover, there is less edematous swelling of tissue. h Standard (silver sulfadiazine) cream-treated group characterized by significant tissue repair and re-structuring with little edematous fluid
Fig. 2Changes in wound tissue TBARS after scald burn injury. The graph represents tissue levels of TBARS (mM/ml) in sham, burn injury control, cream base-treated, silver sulfadiazine (standard)-treated, and different isoquercetin-based cream-treated groups. Results are represented as the mean ± standard deviation; n = 6 per group. aSignificant change in the mean value as compared to the sham group with p < 0.05; bsignificant change in the mean value as compared to the burn injury group with p < 0.05
Fig. 3Changes in wound tissue GSH after scald burn injury. The graph represents tissue levels of GSH (mM/ml) of sham, burn injury control, cream base-treated, silver sulfadiazine (standard)-treated, and different isoquercetin-based cream-treated groups. Results are represented as the mean ± standard deviation; n = 6 per group. aSignificant change in the mean value as compared to the sham group with p < 0.05; bsignificant change in the mean value as compared to the burn injury group with p < 0.05