Literature DB >> 27574383

Safety and Effectiveness of Closure Devices Applied to a Stented Common Femoral Artery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Nicolas W Shammas1, Gail A Shammas1, Thomas Harris1, Cara M Voelliger1, Andrew N Shammas1, Michael Jerin1.   

Abstract

Bailout stenting of the common femoral artery (CFA) may become necessary with failed balloon angioplasty or atherectomy or in case of bleeding requiring a covered stent over the arteriotomy site. Reaccessing the CFA through a previously placed stent may occur during angiography. The safety and effectiveness of applying a closure device, or manual compression to achieve hemostasis through an accessed stented CFA are unknown. All patients in our practice that underwent CFA stenting were identified using billing records for 3 years (January 1, 2010-February 28, 2013). Patients were included if there has been documentation of access through the stented CFA segment on angiography. In-hospital and up to 2 weeks postdischarge major adverse events were recorded from medical records. A total of 48 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 65.9 ± 10.9 years, males 60.4%. Perclose (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA) was used in 85.7%, AngioSeal (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN) in 8.3%, Mynx (Access Closure, Santa Clara, CA) in 2%, and manual compression in 4% of the patients. Major adverse events consisted of in-hospital mortality in two patients: one probably related to index access-site thrombosis complicated by subsequent acute renal failure following reintervention; the other mortality was related to major bleeding possibly related to the index access site. The remaining patients had no adverse events and there were no reported problems at 2 weeks follow-up. Accessing and applying closure device in stented CFA can be accomplished successfully in approximately 96% of the patients with low major adverse events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  closure device; common femoral artery; safety; stent

Year:  2016        PMID: 27574383      PMCID: PMC5001873          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1572524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Angiol        ISSN: 1061-1711


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of vascular closure devices vs manual compression after femoral artery puncture: the ISAR-CLOSURE randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Stefanie Schulz-Schüpke; Sandra Helde; Senta Gewalt; Tareq Ibrahim; Maryam Linhardt; Katharina Haas; Katharina Hoppe; Corinna Böttiger; Philip Groha; Christian Bradaric; Roland Schmidt; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Ilka Ott; Julia Goedel; Robert A Byrne; Simon Schneider; Christof Burgdorf; Tanja Morath; Sebastian Kufner; Michael Joner; Salvatore Cassese; Petra Hoppmann; Christian Hengstenberg; Jürgen Pache; Massimiliano Fusaro; Steffen Massberg; Julinda Mehilli; Heribert Schunkert; Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparison of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with vs. without severe peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Kaffer Kara; Philip Kahlert; Amir A Mahabadi; Björn Plicht; Alexander Y Lind; Detlev Longwitz; Matthias Bollow; Raimund Erbel
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.487

  2 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for Facilitating Totally Percutaneous Transfemoral TAVR Procedures.

Authors:  Amnon Eitan; Hussein Sliman; Avinoam Shiran; Ronen Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.