Literature DB >> 27573936

Efficacy and Safety of Cannabidiol and Tetrahydrocannabivarin on Glycemic and Lipid Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Pilot Study.

Khalid A Jadoon1, Stuart H Ratcliffe2, David A Barrett3, E Louise Thomas4, Colin Stott5, Jimmy D Bell4, Saoirse E O'Sullivan6, Garry D Tan7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) are nonpsychoactive phytocannabinoids affecting lipid and glucose metabolism in animal models. This study set out to examine the effects of these compounds in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 62 subjects with noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes were randomized to five treatment arms: CBD (100 mg twice daily), THCV (5 mg twice daily), 1:1 ratio of CBD and THCV (5 mg/5 mg, twice daily), 20:1 ratio of CBD and THCV (100 mg/5 mg, twice daily), or matched placebo for 13 weeks. The primary end point was a change in HDL-cholesterol concentrations from baseline. Secondary/tertiary end points included changes in glycemic control, lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, body weight, liver triglyceride content, adipose tissue distribution, appetite, markers of inflammation, markers of vascular function, gut hormones, circulating endocannabinoids, and adipokine concentrations. Safety and tolerability end points were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Compared with placebo, THCV significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference [ETD] = -1.2 mmol/L; P < 0.05) and improved pancreatic β-cell function (HOMA2 β-cell function [ETD = -44.51 points; P < 0.01]), adiponectin (ETD = -5.9 × 10(6) pg/mL; P < 0.01), and apolipoprotein A (ETD = -6.02 μmol/L; P < 0.05), although plasma HDL was unaffected. Compared with baseline (but not placebo), CBD decreased resistin (-898 pg/ml; P < 0.05) and increased glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (21.9 pg/ml; P < 0.05). None of the combination treatments had a significant impact on end points. CBD and THCV were well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: THCV could represent a new therapeutic agent in glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
© 2016 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27573936     DOI: 10.2337/dc16-0650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  68 in total

Review 1.  Endocannabinoids and Stroke Prevention: Review of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Eugene L Scharf; Jon O Ebbert
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2020-02-27

Review 2.  Medical cannabis: aligning use to evidence-based medicine approach.

Authors:  Lihi Bar-Lev Schleider; Ran Abuhasira; Victor Novack
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  New approaches and challenges to targeting the endocannabinoid system.

Authors:  Vincenzo Di Marzo
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Barriers to the wider adoption of medicinal Cannabis.

Authors:  Stephen Ph Alexander
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-05-29

5.  Δ8 -Tetrahydrocannabivarin has potent anti-nicotine effects in several rodent models of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Zheng-Xiong Xi; Pretal Muldoon; Xiao-Fei Wang; Guo-Hua Bi; M Imad Damaj; Aron H Lichtman; Roger G Pertwee; Eliot L Gardner
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 6.  The Expanded Endocannabinoid System/Endocannabinoidome as a Potential Target for Treating Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Alain Veilleux; Vincenzo Di Marzo; Cristoforo Silvestri
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  Effects of non-euphoric plant cannabinoids on muscle quality and performance of dystrophic mdx mice.

Authors:  Fabio Arturo Iannotti; Ester Pagano; Aniello Schiano Moriello; Filomena Grazia Alvino; Nicolina Cristina Sorrentino; Luca D'Orsi; Elisabetta Gazzerro; Raffaele Capasso; Elvira De Leonibus; Luciano De Petrocellis; Vincenzo Di Marzo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 8.  Cardiovascular effects of marijuana and synthetic cannabinoids: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Authors:  Pal Pacher; Sabine Steffens; György Haskó; Thomas H Schindler; George Kunos
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Potential of Cannabinoid Receptor Ligands as Treatment for Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Ewa Galaj; Zheng-Xiong Xi
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 10.  Therapeutic potential and safety considerations for the clinical use of synthetic cannabinoids.

Authors:  Dennis J Sholler; Marilyn A Huestis; Benjamin Amendolara; Ryan Vandrey; Ziva D Cooper
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.