Noor de Klerk1, Tineke A Abma2, Lotte L M Bamelis3, Arnoud Arntz4. 1. NPI Specialist in Personality Pathology,the Netherlands. 2. VU Medical Center,the Netherlands. 3. Hospital Oost-Limburg,Belgium and Maastricht University,the Netherlands. 4. University of Amsterdam, andMaastricht University,the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have evaluated the (cost) effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders, but little research has been done on the perspectives of patients and therapists. AIM: The present study aims to explore patients' and therapists' perspectives on schema therapy. METHOD: Qualitative data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 patients and a focus group of 8 therapists. A thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Most patients and therapists agreed that helpful aspects in schema therapy were the highly committed therapeutic relationship, the transparent and clear theoretical model, and the specific schema therapy techniques. About unhelpful aspects, several patients and some therapists shared the opinion that 50 sessions was not enough. Furthermore, patients lacked clear advance information about the possibility that they might temporarily experience stronger emotions during therapy and the possibility of having telephone contact outside session hours. They missed practical goals in the later stage of therapy. With regard to imagery, patients experienced time pressure and they missed a proper link between the past and the present. For therapists, it was hard to manage the therapeutic relation, to get used to a new kind of therapy and to keep the treatment focused on personality problems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and therapists found some aspects of the schema therapy protocol helpful. Their views about which aspects are unhelpful and their recommendations need to be taken into consideration when adjusting the protocol and implementing schema therapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Several studies have evaluated the (cost) effectiveness of schema therapy for personality disorders, but little research has been done on the perspectives of patients and therapists. AIM: The present study aims to explore patients' and therapists' perspectives on schema therapy. METHOD: Qualitative data were collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 patients and a focus group of 8 therapists. A thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Most patients and therapists agreed that helpful aspects in schema therapy were the highly committed therapeutic relationship, the transparent and clear theoretical model, and the specific schema therapy techniques. About unhelpful aspects, several patients and some therapists shared the opinion that 50 sessions was not enough. Furthermore, patients lacked clear advance information about the possibility that they might temporarily experience stronger emotions during therapy and the possibility of having telephone contact outside session hours. They missed practical goals in the later stage of therapy. With regard to imagery, patients experienced time pressure and they missed a proper link between the past and the present. For therapists, it was hard to manage the therapeutic relation, to get used to a new kind of therapy and to keep the treatment focused on personality problems. CONCLUSIONS:Patients and therapists found some aspects of the schema therapy protocol helpful. Their views about which aspects are unhelpful and their recommendations need to be taken into consideration when adjusting the protocol and implementing schema therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Schema therapy; personality disorder; perspectives; qualitative research
Authors: Yeow May Tan; Christopher W Lee; Lynn E Averbeck; Odette Brand-de Wilde; Joan Farrell; Eva Fassbinder; Gitta A Jacob; Desiree Martius; Sophie Wastiaux; Gerhard Zarbock; Arnoud Arntz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: John Philip Louis; Vida Ortiz; Joanna Barlas; Joyce Sue Lee; George Lockwood; Wayne Freeman Chong; Karen McDonald Louis; Patricia Sim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Iuno Z Groot; Anne-Sophie S M Venhuizen; Nathan Bachrach; Simone Walhout; Bregje de Moor; Kasper Nikkels; Susanne Dalmeijer; Myrte Maarschalkerweerd; Joël R van Aalderen; Hinde de Lange; Renske Wichers; Agatha Ph Hollander; Silvia M A A Evers; Raoul P P P Grasman; Arnoud Arntz Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2022-10-08 Impact factor: 4.144
Authors: Susan G Simpson; Giada Pietrabissa; Alessandro Rossi; Tahnee Seychell; Gian Mauro Manzoni; Calum Munro; Julian B Nesci; Gianluca Castelnuovo Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2018-04-24