Literature DB >> 27573052

Bioenergetics, Trophic Ecology, and Niche Separation of Tunas.

R J Olson1, J W Young2, F Ménard3, M Potier4, V Allain5, N Goñi6, J M Logan7, F Galván-Magaña8.   

Abstract

Tunas are highly specialized predators that have evolved numerous adaptations for a lifestyle that requires large amounts of energy consumption. Here we review our understanding of the bioenergetics and feeding dynamics of tunas on a global scale, with an emphasis on yellowfin, bigeye, skipjack, albacore, and Atlantic bluefin tunas. Food consumption balances bioenergetics expenditures for respiration, growth (including gonad production), specific dynamic action, egestion, and excretion. Tunas feed across the micronekton and some large zooplankton. Some tunas appear to time their life history to take advantage of ephemeral aggregations of crustacean, fish, and molluscan prey. Ontogenetic and spatial diet differences are substantial, and significant interdecadal changes in prey composition have been observed. Diet shifts from larger to smaller prey taxa highlight ecosystem-wide changes in prey availability and diversity and provide implications for changing bioenergetics requirements into the future. Where tunas overlap, we show evidence of niche separation between them; resources are divided largely by differences in diet percentages and size ranges of prey taxa. The lack of long-term data limits the ability to predict impacts of climate change on tuna feeding behaviour. We note the need for systematic collection of feeding data as part of routine monitoring of these species, and we highlight the advantages of using biochemical techniques for broad-scale analyses of trophic relations. We support the continued development of ecosystem models, which all too often lack the regional-specific trophic data needed to adequately investigate climate and fishing impacts.
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioenergetics; Climate change; Food webs; Niche separation; Pelagic; Predator–prey; Stable isotope ecology; Trophic ecology; Tunas

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27573052     DOI: 10.1016/bs.amb.2016.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Mar Biol        ISSN: 0065-2881            Impact factor:   5.143


  4 in total

1.  A representative sampling of tuna muscle for mercury control.

Authors:  Pierluigi Piras; Antonino Bella; Maurizio Cossu; Gianuario Fiori; Andrea Sanna; Giannina Chessa
Journal:  Ital J Food Saf       Date:  2020-12-03

2.  Evidence that Pacific tuna mercury levels are driven by marine methylmercury production and anthropogenic inputs.

Authors:  Anaïs Médieu; David Point; Takaaki Itai; Hélène Angot; Pearse J Buchanan; Valérie Allain; Leanne Fuller; Shane Griffiths; David P Gillikin; Jeroen E Sonke; Lars-Eric Heimbürger-Boavida; Marie-Maëlle Desgranges; Christophe E Menkes; Daniel J Madigan; Pablo Brosset; Olivier Gauthier; Alessandro Tagliabue; Laurent Bopp; Anouk Verheyden; Anne Lorrain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Contribution to the reproductive ecology of Notoscopelus resplendens (Richardson, 1845) (Myctophidae) in the Central-Eastern Atlantic.

Authors:  A N Sarmiento-Lezcano; R Triay-Portella; A Guerra-Marrero; D Jiménez-Alvarado; U Rubio-Rodríguez; R Núñez-González; F Bordes; J J Castro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) foraging habitat and trophic position in the Gulf of Mexico based on intrinsic isotope tracers.

Authors:  Meliza Le-Alvarado; Alfonsina E Romo-Curiel; Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki; Oscar Hernández-Sánchez; Leticia Barbero; Sharon Z Herzka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.