Literature DB >> 27572996

The accuracy of reading speed measurement by stopwatch versus measurement with an automated computer program (rad-rd©).

Wolfgang Radner1, Gabriela Diendorfer2, Bettina Kainrath3, Christian Kollmitzer3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the reading time and reading speed measurements obtained with a stopwatch with those of an automated computer program for measuring reading speed and acuity (rad-rd© ; patent: AT 504635B1/10-2006).
METHODS: The rad-rd© was used (in conjunction with a PC and microphone) for the computer-based measurements. In rotation, each of four examiners took a turn reading the 12 sentences from one of the four RADNER Reading Charts to three other examiners, who served as stoppers. The stoppers simultaneously measured the reading time with a stopwatch while a fifth investigator used the rad-rd© to obtain computerized measurements. The stopwatch measurements were then statistically compared with the rad-rd© measurements.
RESULTS: The mean reading time obtained with the stopwatch measurements was 4.34 ± 0.57 seconds (196.21 ± 21.79 wpm), versus 4.44 ± 0.59 seconds (192.24 ± 22.20 wpm) by computer measurement (r = 0.84). Of the 144 stopwatch measurements, 97 (67.36%) were shorter, and 47 (32.64%) were equal to (n = 5) or longer than the computer measurements. The mean difference for the shorter measurements was -0.17 ± 0.1 seconds (3.91% of the mean reading time), and the mean difference for the longer measurements was 0.11 ± 0.1 seconds (2.53% of the mean reading time). Most differences ranged from -0.1 to 0.1 seconds (42.36%). The results did not differ significantly among the four stoppers.
CONCLUSION: The rad-rd© is an accurate, automated computer program for measuring reading time. Stopwatch measurements, although subject to inaccuracy from several sources, remain a reliable and simple method for analysis of reading performance.
© 2016 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Radner Reading Charts; Radner reading test; Reading speed; reading acuity; reading speed device

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27572996     DOI: 10.1111/aos.13201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  4 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Web-Based Reading Test for Normal and Low Vision Patients.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Erald Duzha; Maria Tzinava; Asli Perente; Aristeidis Konstantinidis; Konstantinos Delibasis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-22

2.  Introduction of a digital near-vision reading test for normal and low vision adults: development and validation.

Authors:  Georgios Labiris; Eirini-Kanella Panagiotopoulou; Eleftherios Chatzimichael; Maria Tzinava; Asimina Mataftsi; Konstantinos Delibasis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-10-22

3.  The Effects of 10 Weeks Hangboard Training on Climbing Specific Maximal Strength, Explosive Strength, and Finger Endurance.

Authors:  Espen Hermans; Atle H Saeterbakken; Vegard Vereide; Ivar S O Nord; Nicolay Stien; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Design and Validation of a New Smartphone-Based Reading Speed App (GDRS-Test) for the Greek Speaking Population.

Authors:  Diamantis Almaliotis; Georgios P Athanasopoulos; Stavroula Almpanidou; Eleni P Papadopoulou; Vasileios Karampatakis
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-08-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.