| Literature DB >> 27572662 |
Woosung Choi1, Kyungmin Min1, Chaehoon Kim1, Young Soo Ko2, Jae Wan Jeon2, Hwimin Seo3, Yong-Ki Park3, Minkee Choi1.
Abstract
<span class="Chemical">Amine-containing adsorbents have been extensively investigated for post-combustion <span class="Chemical">carbon dioxide capture due to their ability to chemisorb low-concentration carbon dioxide from a wet flue gas. However, earlier studies have focused primarily on the carbon dioxide uptake of adsorbents, and have not demonstrated effective adsorbent regeneration and long-term stability under such conditions. Here, we report the versatile and scalable synthesis of a functionalized-polyethyleneimine (PEI)/silica adsorbent which simultaneously exhibits a large working capacity (2.2 mmol g(-1)) and long-term stability in a practical temperature swing adsorption process (regeneration under 100% carbon dioxide at 120 °C), enabling the separation of concentrated carbon dioxide. We demonstrate that the functionalization of PEI with 1,2-epoxybutane reduces the heat of adsorption and facilitates carbon dioxide desorption (>99%) during regeneration compared with unmodified PEI (76%). Moreover, the functionalization significantly improves long-term adsorbent stability over repeated temperature swing adsorption cycles due to the suppression of urea formation and oxidative amine degradation.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27572662 PMCID: PMC5013602 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Schematic representation of the scalable synthesis of the CO2 adsorbent.
(a) Functionalization of PEI with 1,2-epoxybutane was carried out by a single-step addition reaction. To control the degree of functionalization, varied amounts of 1,2-epoxybutane were added to 17 wt% methanolic solution of PEI and the reaction was carried out at room temperature for 12 h. (b) Silica microspheres having extra-large porosity (1.7 cm3 g−1) were synthesized by spray-drying a water slurry containing 10 wt% fumed silica and 0.5 wt% silica sol as a binder, followed by air calcination at 600 °C to sinter the fumed silica into a 3D porous structure. (c) The methanolic solutions of the functionalized PEIs obtained in a were impregnated into the pre-made silica microspheres.
Physical characteristics of the prepared materials.
| SiO2 | — | — | — | — | — | 299 | 1.7 | — |
| PEI/SiO2 | — | — | 36 | 37 | 27 | 37 | 0.34 | 10.4 |
| 0.15EB-PEI/SiO2 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 23 | 44 | 33 | 40 | 0.37 | 8.9 |
| 0.37EB-PEI/SiO2 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 10 | 56 | 34 | 43 | 0.37 | 6.7 |
| 0.54EB-PEI/SiO2 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 2 | 61 | 37 | 45 | 0.38 | 5.9 |
*O/N mole ratio was determined from elemental analysis.
†Amine state distributions of PEI and functionalized PEIs were calculated from 13C NMR analysis.
‡BET surface areas were determined in the P/P0 range of 0.05–0.20.
§Total pore volumes (Vtotal) were evaluated at P/P0=0.99.
Figure 2Characterization of functionalized PEIs and a microsphere silica support.
(a) Molecular structure and a representative liquid-phase 13C NMR spectrum for a functionalized PEI (0.37EB-PEI). (b) Amine state distributions of PEI and functionalized PEIs (nEB-PEI) analysed by 13C NMR. Quantitative NMR analysis of the amine state distribution was carried out using the following equation; primary(1°):secondary(2°):tertiary(3°)=(Aa+Ab):(Ac+Ad+Ae+A1)/2:(Af+Ag+Ah+A1')/3, where A is the integrated peak area for i species4445. (c,d) Scanning electron microscope image of the silica microspheres synthesized by a spray-drying of a fumed silica. Scale bars, 50 μm (c), 200 nm (d). (e) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherm of the silica microspheres measured at −196 °C (inset: corresponding pore size distribution obtained using the Barrett−Joyner−Halenda (BJH) equation). (f) Comparison of CO2 adsorption–desorption profiles of various silicas impregnated with 50 wt% PEI in a TSA cycle (adsorption: 15% CO2, 3% H2O, 2% Ar in N2 balance at 40 °C; desorption: 100% CO2 at 120 °C). PEI impregnated in the silica microspheres (PEI/SiO2) showed much higher CO2 uptake than PEIs in ordered mesoporous silicas such as MCM-41 and SBA-15.
Figure 3CO2 adsorption–desorption behaviour of the adsorbents.
(a) CO2 adsorption–desorption profiles of the adsorbents in a TSA cycle (adsorption: 15% CO2, 3% H2O, 2% Ar in N2 balance at 40 °C; desorption: 100% CO2 at 120 °C). (b) CO2 adsorption/desorption amounts during the TSA cycle (bars) and the heat of CO2 adsorption (line plot) for the adsorbents. The measurements were repeated three times and averaged.
Figure 4Long-term stabilities of the adsorbents.
(a) CO2 adsorption–desorption profiles of the PEI/SiO2, 0.15EB-PEI/SiO2, 0.37EB-PEI/SiO2 and 0.54EB-PEI/SiO2 during 50 consecutive TSA cycles (adsorption: 15% CO2, 3% H2O, 2% Ar in N2 balance at 40 °C; adsorbent regeneration: 100% CO2 at 120 °C). (b) CO2 working capacities of adsorbents plotted over the number of TSA cycles.
Figure 5Stability against urea formation.
(a) FT-IR spectra of the adsorbents measured after 50 consecutive TSA cycles (adsorption: 15% CO2, 3% H2O, 2% Ar in N2 balance at 40 °C; adsorbent regeneration: 100% CO2 at 120 °C). Dashed lines indicate the spectra for freshly prepared samples, while solid lines indicate those for the samples after 50 consecutive TSA cycles. (b) Possible pathways for the CO2-induced urea formation. These mechanisms are based on the previous studies by Sayari and Belmabkhout21.