| Literature DB >> 27572527 |
Joseph S Pechsiri1, Jean-Baptiste E Thomas2, Emma Risén3, Mauricio S Ribeiro2, Maria E Malmström2, Göran M Nylund4, Anette Jansson5, Ulrika Welander5, Henrik Pavia4, Fredrik Gröndahl2.
Abstract
The cultivation of seaweed as a feedstock for third generation biofuels is gathering interest in Europe, however, many questions remain unanswered in practise, notably regarding scales of operation, energy returns on investment (EROI) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, all of which are crucial to determine commercial viability. This study performed an energy and GHG emissions analysis, using EROI and GHG savings potential respectively, as indicators of commercial viability for two systems: the Swedish Seafarm project's seaweed cultivation (0.5ha), biogas and fertilizer biorefinery, and an estimation of the same system scaled up and adjusted to a cultivation of 10ha. Based on a conservative estimate of biogas yield, neither the 0.5ha case nor the up-scaled 10ha estimates met the (commercial viability) target EROI of 3, nor the European Union Renewable Energy Directive GHG savings target of 60% for biofuels, however the potential for commercial viability was substantially improved by scaling up operations: GHG emissions and energy demand, per unit of biogas, was almost halved by scaling operations up by a factor of twenty, thereby approaching the EROI and GHG savings targets set, under beneficial biogas production conditions. Further analysis identified processes whose optimisations would have a large impact on energy use and emissions (such as anaerobic digestion) as well as others embodying potential for further economies of scale (such as harvesting), both of which would be of interest for future developments of kelp to biogas and fertilizer biorefineries. Copyright ÂKeywords: Biorefinery; EURED GHG savings; Economy of scale; Energy return on investment (EROI); Saccharina latissima; Swedish macroalgae cultivation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27572527 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963