Literature DB >> 27572065

A new technique for minimally invasive irreversible electroporation of tumors in the head and body of the pancreas.

David Stillström1, Henrik Nilsson2, Michaela Jesse3, Matthias Peterhans4, Eduard Jonas5,6, Jacob Freedman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Palliative irreversible electroporation of pancreatic adenocarcinomas is rapidly gaining in interest since a large proportion of these patients cannot be radically resected.
METHODS: This is a description of a minimally invasive approach to irreversible electroporation of pancreatic tumors using computer-assisted navigation, laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound to correctly guide electrodes into the tissue.
RESULTS: The procedure is presented.
CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive irreversible electroporation of pancreatic tumors through computer-assisted navigation of needles during laparoscopy is a feasible and accurate approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma; Computer-assisted navigation; IRE; Irreversible electroporation; Laparoscopy; Pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27572065      PMCID: PMC5346119          DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5173-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


Background

Pancreatic cancer accounts for 4 % of cancer deaths worldwide and is on the trajectory of becoming the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the USA by 2030. Fifty percent of patients will have a disseminated disease at the time of diagnosis [1]. In patients with localized tumors, approximately 20 % are resectable with a disappointing 5-year survival of 20–25 % being reported [2, 3]. The remaining patients receive oncologic treatment (downstaging or palliative) or best supportive care, with a dismal 5-year survival of around 2 % [4]. Resection of tumors in the head of the pancreas involves major surgery with resection of the pancreas, duodenum, distal bile duct and often part of the stomach, and in selected cases, resection of vascular structures involved [5]. Postoperative morbidity is high, and problems such as delayed gastric emptying are common [6]. Alternative means for local treatment has been investigated, including radiation therapy and a variety of thermal and non-thermal local ablation techniques generally with discouraging results [7-9]. Thermal options are problematic because of the proximity of vital vasculature structures and pancreatic and bile ducts, all being sensitive to thermal ablation. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a relatively new method for local treatment, achieving cell death by the application of short electrical pulses (millisecond pulses with field strengths of up to 1500 V/cm) while causing minimal thermal effects on connective tissue. Vascular and ductal structures are there for generally spared. Promising results have been reported for IRE as an adjuvant to chemotherapy, almost doubling median survival in palliative patients and increasing resection margins in resections with curative intent [10]. The IRE electrodes are applied during open surgery or percutaneously using ultrasound guidance. Problems with these approaches include trauma caused by the laparotomy and avoiding damage to surrounding organs, especially with the percutaneous approach. In an effort to address these issues, a laparoscopic approach has been developed using 3D mapping of relevant structures, computer-assisted navigation and laparoscopic ultrasound.

Methods

Patients were all presented at a pancreas multidisciplinary team (MDT) conference, and the possibility of curative surgery was ruled out. They were referred for palliative chemotherapy and on patient demand assessed for IRE ablation. In patients, deemed suitable for treatment, the experimental nature of the treatment was explained and written consent obtained. Only patients with localized disease without any signs of metastases were included. Procedures were performed under general anesthesia with a complete neuromuscular block to reduce muscle contractions caused by the strong electrical pulses administered. A 3D anatomical map, constructed from a 3-phase preoperative CT scan using dedicated software (MeVis AG, Bremen, Germany), was loaded into the CAS-One navigation system (Cascination AG, Bern, Switzerland), consisting of a computer with a stereotactic infrared camera and dedicated navigational software developed for open liver surgery [11]. Using ultrasonic energy (Harmonic ACE, Ethicon Endo-surgery, USA), the gastrocolic ligament was opened along the greater curvature of the stomach right up to the pylorus. The stomach was displaced cephalad, and the ventral aspect of the pancreas visualized. Four-point matching with the 3D model was performed using a rigid pointing instrument for acquiring anatomical structures around the tumor which were directly visible or identifiable on ultrasound. The formation pattern for the IRE needles was designed based on tumor-specific properties with consideration of surrounding structures. Needles were inserted into the abdominal cavity through coaxial stabilizing needles and advanced into the pancreatic tissue at a point defined using the rigid pointer and to a depth indicated by the navigational software that recognizes reflective spheres on a marker shield attached to the handle of the IRE needle. Laparoscopic ultrasound was used to ascertain optimal needle positioning, for example, by visualizing the superior mesenteric artery and placing needles on each side to ablate tumorous tissue around the artery. After application of the calculated ablation energy, needles were removed under direct visual control ensuring hemostasis (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Patient setup with CAS-One on the patients right with twin infrared cameras and laparoscopic screen and ultrasound screen on the left. A On-screen image of rendered abdominal structures in the MeVis model. B Laparoscopic port placements and site of IRE needle entries. C Laparoscopic view of laparoscopic ultrasound device aligned over the superior mesenteric artery and IRE needles inserted in a 2 × 3 fashion to surround the tumor. D Setup of surgeons and monitors

Patient setup with CAS-One on the patients right with twin infrared cameras and laparoscopic screen and ultrasound screen on the left. A On-screen image of rendered abdominal structures in the MeVis model. B Laparoscopic port placements and site of IRE needle entries. C Laparoscopic view of laparoscopic ultrasound device aligned over the superior mesenteric artery and IRE needles inserted in a 2 × 3 fashion to surround the tumor. D Setup of surgeons and monitors

Results

Patient 1

A 75-year-old woman with an initially 30-mm pancreatic adenocarcinoma surrounding the superior mesenteric artery was treated after a response on chemotherapy (10-mm shrinkage) was achieved. Surgery took 190 min, and the patient was discharged after 12 days. The postoperative period was complicated by an acute fluid collection which was drained percutaneously and vanished. Postoperative imaging after 8 months showed a stable 25-mm lesion and up to 8-mm-large lymph nodes in the vicinity, a situation that has remained unchanged for the subsequent 6 months (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

3D reconstruction of preoperative CT-scan for patient 1

3D reconstruction of preoperative CT-scan for patient 1

Patient 2

A 64-year-old man with a 35-mm pancreatic adenocarcinoma surrounding the superior mesenteric artery was treated after 1-year chemotherapy treatment resulted in stable disease. Surgery took 156 min, and the patient was discharged after 5 days. The postoperative course was uneventful. Postoperative imaging at 6 months showed a diffused perivascular infiltration with subsequent growth observed at the tumor site, measuring 30 × 80 mm at one-year follow-up. After 14 months, the patient is still alive and under palliative care (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

3D reconstruction of preoperative CT-scan for patient 2

3D reconstruction of preoperative CT-scan for patient 2

Patient 3

A 78-year-old woman with a 50 × 45 mm pancreatic adenocarcinoma surrounding the superior mesenteric artery, engaging most of the uncinate process, was treated. The duration of surgery was 282 min of which the treatment took 160 min. The postoperative period was complicated by pancreatitis with acute fluid collections and spondylodiscitis affecting the epidural space. On day 6, there was a small duodenal perforation that was successfully covered by a covered stent. Postoperative imaging has shown complete ablation of the tumor, and the patient could after 100 days of hospice care return home. After 146 days, the patient is cared for in her home with minimal discomfort, but a new CT scan has showed recurrent tumor, and palliative chemotherapy is planned (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4

3D reconstruction of preoperative CT-scan for patient 3

3D reconstruction of preoperative CT-scan for patient 3

Discussion

We present a novel method for minimally invasive irreversible electroporation in the palliative treatment of pancreatic tumors. The present work describes a workflow for virtual 3D treatment planning and computer-assisted navigation for guidance of electrode placement, which was successfully implemented on three patients. We believe that computer-assisted navigation improves orientation in the complex vascular settings, enabling IRE treatment with a laparoscopic approach. Although this technique offers minimal trauma for the access, the ablative treatment in itself can cause severe local trauma to the tumor and surrounding pancreatic tissue with resulting secondary pancreatitis associated with postoperative pain, fluid collections and pseudocyst formation that need to be managed as in any pancreatitis. A randomized controlled study examining the efficacy of the addition of minimally invasive IRE to standard chemotherapy of primarily inoperable localized pancreatic tumors is planned. A 3D-PDF file is included and is the 3D reconstruction for the third patient with the resulting ablated volume overlaid and an approximation of the needle configuration used. The file must be opened in Adobe Acrobat Reader to work properly. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (PDF 4420 kb)
  11 in total

Review 1.  Demographics, epidemiology, and inheritance of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Theresa Pluth Yeo
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  A navigation system for open liver surgery: design, workflow and first clinical applications.

Authors:  M Peterhans; A vom Berg; B Dagon; D Inderbitzin; C Baur; D Candinas; S Weber
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 2.547

3.  Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators.

Authors:  T A Sohn; C J Yeo; J L Cameron; L Koniaris; S Kaushal; R A Abrams; P K Sauter; J Coleman; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Systematic review of innovative ablative therapies for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  S J E Rombouts; J A Vogel; H C van Santvoort; K P van Lienden; R van Hillegersberg; O R C Busch; M G H Besselink; I Q Molenaar
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure.

Authors:  Cristina R Ferrone; Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke; Jordan P Bloom; Hui Zheng; Jackye Szymonifka; Jennifer A Wargo; Sarah P Thayer; Gregory Y Lauwers; Vikram Deshpande; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Keith D Lillemoe; Andrew L Warshaw
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage III) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Robert C G Martin; David Kwon; Sricharan Chalikonda; Marty Sellers; Eric Kotz; Charles Scoggins; Kelly M McMasters; Kevin Watkins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Rare long-term survivors of pancreatic adenocarcinoma without curative resection.

Authors:  Stephen Y Oh; Alicia Edwards; Margaret T Mandelson; Bruce Lin; Russell Dorer; W Scott Helton; Richard A Kozarek; Vincent J Picozzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Postoperative complications and overall survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Amudhan Pugalenthi; Mladjan Protic; Mithat Gonen; T Peter Kingham; Michael I D' Angelica; Ronald P Dematteo; Yuman Fong; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Pancreatic cancer and SBRT: A new potential option?

Authors:  Carla Hajj; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-06-28

Review 10.  Current State of Vascular Resections in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Thilo Hackert; Lutz Schneider; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  9 in total

1.  EUS-guided irreversible electroporation using endoscopic needle-electrode in porcine pancreas.

Authors:  Jae Min Lee; Hyuk Soon Choi; Hoon Jai Chun; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hong Sik Lee; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim; Hong Bae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Navigated liver surgery : Current state and importance in the future].

Authors:  K J Oldhafer; M Peterhans; A Kantas; A Schenk; G Makridis; S Pelzl; K C Wagner; S Weber; G A Stavrou; M Donati
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Irreversible electroporation ablation of end-stage metastatic retroperitoneal lesions: Report on three cases and literature review.

Authors:  Tian'An Jiang; Qiyu Zhao; Guo Tian; Xinhua Chen; Liming Wu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Safety and efficacy of magnetic anchoring electrode-assisted irreversible electroporation for gastric tissue ablation.

Authors:  Fenggang Ren; Qingshan Li; Liangshuo Hu; Xiaopeng Yan; Zhongyang Gao; Jing Zhang; Weiman Gao; Zhe Zhang; Pengkang Chang; Xue Chen; Dake Chu; Rongqian Wu; Yi Lv
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A new mode of ventilation for interventional pulmonology. A case with EBUS-TBNA and debulking.

Authors:  Paul Zarogoulidis; Haidong Huang; Chong Bai; Christoforos Kosmidis; Konstantinos Porpodis; Anastasios Kallianos; Lemonia Veletza; Georgia Trakada; Naim Benhassen; Wolfgang Hohenforst-Schmidt
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-28

Review 6.  The use of high-frequency ventilation during general anaesthesia: an update.

Authors:  Karolina Galmén; Piotr Harbut; Jacob Freedman; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-05-30

7.  1000 consecutive ablation sessions in the era of computer assisted image guidance - Lessons learned.

Authors:  Marie Beermann; Johan Lindeberg; Jennie Engstrand; Karolina Galmén; Silja Karlgren; David Stillström; Henrik Nilsson; Piotr Harbut; Jacob Freedman
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2018-12-05

8.  Characterization of irreversible electroporation on the stomach: A feasibility study in rats.

Authors:  Jae Min Lee; Hyuk Soon Choi; Eun Sun Kim; Bora Keum; Yeon Seok Seo; Yoon Tae Jeen; Hong Sik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun; Soon Ho Um; Chang Duck Kim; Hong Bae Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Clinical application of high frequency jet ventilation in stereotactic liver ablations - a methodological study.

Authors:  Karolina Galmén; Jacob Freedman; Grzegorz Toporek; Waldemar Goździk; Piotr Harbut
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.