| Literature DB >> 27570727 |
Didone Frigerio1, Lara Cibulski2, Sonja C Ludwig3, Irene Campderrich4, Kurt Kotrschal1, Claudia A F Wascher5.
Abstract
Individual reproductive success largely depends on the ability to optimize behaviour, immune function and the physiological stress response. We have investigated correlations between behaviour, faecal steroid metabolites, immune parameters, parasite excretion patterns and reproductive output in a critically endangered avian species, the Northern Bald Ibis (Geronticus eremita). In particular, we related haematocrit, heterophil/lymphocyte ratio, excreted immune-reactive corticosterone metabolites and social behaviour with parasite excretion and two individual fitness parameters, namely, number of eggs laid and number of fledglings. We found that the frequency of excretion of parasites' oocysts and eggs tended to increase with ambient temperature. Paired individuals excreted significantly more samples containing nematode eggs than unpaired ones. The excretion of nematode eggs was also significantly more frequent in females than in males. Individuals with a high proportion of droppings containing coccidian oocysts were more often preened by their partners than individuals with lower excretion rates. We observed that the more eggs an individual incubated and the fewer offspring fledged, the higher the rates of excreted samples containing coccidian oocysts. Our results confirm that social behaviour, physiology and parasite burden are linked in a complex and context-dependent manner. They also contribute background information supporting future conservation programmes dealing with this critically endangered species.Entities:
Keywords: Geronticus eremita; Northern Bald Ibis; Parasite burden; Reproduction
Year: 2016 PMID: 27570727 PMCID: PMC4986318 DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1317-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ornithol ISSN: 2193-7192 Impact factor: 1.745
Sex, year of hatching, year of participation in the study and number of eggs and fledglings of all focal individuals in phase 1 (2010) and phase 2 (2012) of data collection
| Name | Sexa | Year of hatching | Year of participation | Eggs 2010 ( | Fledglings 2010 ( | Eggs 2012 ( | Fledglings 2012 ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abraxas | Male | 2002 | 2010 + 2012 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Agatha | Female | 2011 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Albright | Female | 2006 | 2010 | 6 | 2 | – | – |
| Aleppo | Female | 2006 | 2010 + 2012 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Ariadne | Female | 2008 | 2012 | – | – | 3 | 2 |
| Arion | Female | 1999 | 2010 + 2012 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Balu | Male | 2010 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Daphne | Female | 1999 | 2010 + 2012 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Freddy | Male | 1999 | 2010 + 2012 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Goran | Female | 2005 | 2010 + 2012 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Heidi | Male | 2010 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Hera | Male | 1999 | 2010 | 4 | 2 | – | – |
| Hilda | Male | 2009 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Hombre | Male | 2002 | 2010 + 2012 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| Homer | Female | 2006 | 2010 | 4 | 2 | – | – |
| Jarmusch | Male | 2005 | 2012 | – | – | 4 | 2 |
| Jule | Male | 1998 | 2010 + 2012 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Kevin | Male | 1997 | 2010 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
| Loki | Female | 2006 | 2012 | – | – | 4 | 2 |
| Mammut | Female | 2010 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Manitou | Female | 2008 | 2010 | 3 | 0 | – | – |
| Maya | Male | 2006 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Neptun | Female | 1999 | 2010 | 6 | 0 | – | – |
| North face | Male | 2009 | 2010 + 2012 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ophelia | Female | 2011 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Othello | Female | 1999 | 2010 | 5 | 2 | – | – |
| Paco | Male | 2010 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Ritro | Male | 2010 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Rob | Male | 2010 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Salomo | Female | 2002 | 2010 | 4 | 1 | – | – |
| Schreckse | Female | 2008 | 2010 + 2012 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Sesam | - | 2009 | 2010 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
| Shannara | Male | 2007 | 2012 | – | – | 4 | 2 |
| Simon | Male | 2006 | 2012 | – | – | 3 | 2 |
| Skippy | Male | 1998 | 2010 | 5 | 2 | – | – |
| Sorrento | Male | 2006 | 2010 + 2012 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Steppenwolf | Male | 2002 | 2010 + 2012 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Tiffy | Male | 2011 | 2012 | – | – | 0 | 0 |
| Tintifax | Female | 2003 | 2010 | 3 | 2 | – | – |
| Waltraut | – | 2009 | 2010 | 0 | 0 | – | – |
| Winnetouch | Female | 2004 | 2010 + 2012 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
aSex of two individuals is unknown
Fig. 1Mean duration of allopreening received in an observation session in relation to coccidian oocyst content of droppings. Circles Median, error bars interquartile range (25th–75th percentile)
Results of the full statistical models
| Full statistical models | Estimate ± standard error |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ZIGLMM 1 | |||
| | − | − | < |
| |
|
|
|
| Aggression won | −0.06 ± 0.12 | −0.505 | 0.612 |
| | − | − |
|
| ZIGLMM 2 | |||
| (Intercept) | 4.554 ± 0.073 | 6.182 | <0.001 |
| Allopreening received | 0 ± 0.003 | 0.207 | 0.835 |
| | − | − |
|
| | − | − | < |
| ZIGLMM 3 | |||
| | − | − |
|
| Week | 0.120 ± 0.546 | 0.220 | 0.825 |
| |
|
|
|
| Age | 0.096 ± 0.230 | 0.416 | 0.677 |
| |
|
|
|
| Pairbond status | 4.967 ± 5.253 | 0.945 | 0.344 |
| |
|
|
|
| | − | − |
|
| ZIGLMM 4 | |||
| | − | − | < |
| |
|
|
|
| Temperature | 0.020 ± 0.053 | 0.386 | 0.699 |
| Age | −0.084 ± 0.065 | −1.292 | 0.196 |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Number of eggs | 0.045 ± 0.211 | 0.214 | 0.830 |
| Number of fledglings | −0.020 ± 0.273 | −0.075 | 0.939 |
| GLMM 5 | |||
| (Intercept) | 2.238 ± 1.854 | 1.207 | 0.227 |
| Sex | 0.01 ± 0.344 | 0.031 | 0.974 |
| |
|
| < |
| HCT | −5.413 ± 3.945 | −1.371 | 0.17 |
| HL ratio | 0.006 ± 0.077 | 0.085 | 0.932 |
| BM | 0.003 ± 0.003 | 1.052 | 0.292 |
| Aggression won | −0.016 ± 0.024 | −0.677 | 0.498 |
| Aggression lost | −0.051 ± 0.039 | −1.285 | 0.198 |
| |
|
|
|
| % of samples containing nematode eggs | −0.006 ± 0.007 | −0.932 | 0.35 |
| GLMM 6 | |||
| (Intercept) | 1.139 ± 2.569 | 0.443 | 0.657 |
| Sex | 0.209 ± 0.471 | 0.444 | 0.656 |
| Age |
|
|
|
| HCT | −5.663 ± 5.4 | −0.863 | 0.387 |
| HL ratio | −0.021 ± 0.108 | −0.2 | 0.841 |
| BM | 0.006 ± 0.004 | 1.341 | 0.179 |
| Aggression won | −0.02 ± 0.034 | −0.599 | 0.549 |
| Aggression lost | −0.056 ± 0.055 | −1.014 | 0.31 |
| % of samples containing coccidian oocysts | 0.000 ± 0.006 | 0.157 | 0.875 |
| % of samples containing nematode eggs | −0.013 ± 0.011 | −1.216 | 0.223 |
Factors in bold remained in the final model
Fig. 2Excretion of nematode eggs depending on pairbond status. Circles display median, error bars are based on interquartile ranges (lower: 25th and upper: 75th percentile)