To clarify the reproductive cycle of female Rusa deer (Rusa timorensis), the fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites were measured. Fecal samples were collected on a weekly basis for one year (between October, 2012 and September, 2013) from five healthy adult hinds in Thailand. At the beginning of the study, three hinds were pregnant. Two hinds delivered one healthy offspring, and one hind delivered a stillborn calf. The mating period of Rusa hinds in Thailand is from November to April. In pregnant hinds, fecal progesterone metabolite concentration was high in late pregnancy and abruptly declined to the baseline around parturition, suggesting that the placenta secretes a large amount of progesterone. Fecal 17β-estradiol metabolite concentration remained elevated around the day of parturition. Both concentrations of fecal progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites in non-lactating hinds were significantly higher than those in lactating hinds, indicating that ovarian activity of lactating hinds is suppressed by the suckling stimulus of fawn during lactation. The present study demonstrated that monitoring of fecal steroid hormones is useful method for assessing ovarian function in this species.
To clarify the reproductive cycle of female Rusa deer (Rusa timorensis), the fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites were measured. Fecal samples were collected on a weekly basis for one year (between October, 2012 and September, 2013) from five healthy adult hinds in Thailand. At the beginning of the study, three hinds were pregnant. Two hinds delivered one healthy offspring, and one hind delivered a stillborn calf. The mating period of Rusa hinds in Thailand is from November to April. In pregnant hinds, fecal progesterone metabolite concentration was high in late pregnancy and abruptly declined to the baseline around parturition, suggesting that the placenta secretes a large amount of progesterone. Fecal 17β-estradiol metabolite concentration remained elevated around the day of parturition. Both concentrations of fecal progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites in non-lactating hinds were significantly higher than those in lactating hinds, indicating that ovarian activity of lactating hinds is suppressed by the suckling stimulus of fawn during lactation. The present study demonstrated that monitoring of fecal steroid hormones is useful method for assessing ovarian function in this species.
Rusa deer (Rusa timorensis) are an endemic to the Indonesian Archipelago.
According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened
Species, Rusa deer are considered as vulnerable due to their highly fragmented natural
habitats, habitat degradation and the effects of poaching [11]. However, the species has been introduced to many countries in Indo-Pacific
region including Thailand for venison and to be farmed for velvet production [24]. It is therefore one of six species in the Cervidae
family living in Thailand. Thus, the understanding of Rusa deer reproduction not only has
economic benefits for deer farming operations, but also represents a model for endangered deer
species in Thailand. The major breeding activity was observed in plasma progesterone of female
Rusa deer in Malaysia under appropriate environmental conditions and high nutrition in March
to July [14]. After 8 months of gestation, adult hinds
generally give birth with a single calf. In general, the body weight of Rusa hind at the first
mating (18–20 months of age) is approximately 46 kg [30] and increases to 60 kg when mature. Mature stag weighes approximately 80 kg [9]. However, there is little reproductive information or
endocrine data to confirm seasonal ovarian activity in Rusa hind, and there is no information
on fecal steroid hormone profiles of Rusa deer. The objective of this study was to determine
the reproductive cycle of Rusa hind by monitoring the annual fecal concentrations of
progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals and management: Five healthy adult Rusa hinds (Fig.1), aged 2–3 years old with live body weight of 32–45 kg, were maintained at Kasetsart
University Kamphaeng Campus, Thailand (14° 0′ 24.60″ N 99° 59′ 19.80″ E). Hinds were
separated into two groups; pregnant (n=3) and non-pregnant (n=2). All animal procedures were
approved by the Deer Co-operative of Thailand, LTD. (DCOT). All hinds were exposed to
natural photoperiod and fed ad libitum with fresh Panicum grass
(Brachiaria mutica), Pangola grass (Digitaria eriantha),
commercial pellets [Betagro 004 dairy cattle pellet (16% protein, 3% fat, 12% fiber and 13%
moisture); Betagro Co. Limited, Bangkok, Thailand] and natural leaves. They were allowed to
assess tapwater ad libitum.
Fig. 1.
A healthy adult Rusa hind (Rusa timorensis) in August.
A healthy adult Rusa hind (Rusa timorensis) in August.Sampling period and fecal collection: Fecal samples were collected weekly
from all animals all year round from October 2012 through to September 2013. Five hinds were
housed together in outdoor enclosures adjacent to stags. Fresh feces were collected between
08.00 to 09.30 hr and kept in sealed plastic bags. All fecal samples were stored at −20°C
until processing.Pregnancy and fawning data: Three of five hinds were pregnant in the last
season. Two hinds delivered one healthy offspring on October 15 and October 20, 2012,
respectively. Two fawns were housed with their mother until weaning. Fawns were weaned until
6 months old. Another hind delivered a stillborn calf on October 18, 2012. However, this
hind was lactated by two fawns delivered from two different mothers. This species of deer
nursed not only their own fawns but also other fawns delivered from females in the same
group.Fecal extraction: Frozen fecal samples were dried in an oven at 56–60°C
for approximately 72 hr and were extracted with ethanol following procedure that described
by Brown et al. [3]. Sample contained
with steroid metabolites was stored at −20°C until analysis.Fecal progesterone analysis by enzyme immunoassay (EIA): Fecal
concentration of progesterone metabolite was determined by enzyme immunoassay as described
by Brown et al. [5]. The intra- and
inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 6.27% and 6.28% (n=11), respectively. Data
are expressed as ng/g dry feces.Fecal 17β-estradiol analysis by radioimmunoassay (RIA): The concentration
of fecal 17β-estradiol metabolite was determined by radioimmunoassay using
125I-labeled radioligand as described by Taya et al. [29]. Anti-sera against 17β-estradiol (GDN 244) were used.
The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 4.64% and 7.60% (n=10).Data evaluation and statistical analyses: Results of five hinds were
analyzed by their pregnancy status. The female Rusa deer do not show a clear seasonality in
reproductive behavior. On the other hand, the antlers of male Rusa deer shedded in May, and
the new velvet antlers grew from June to October. Thereafter, the antlers became hard from
November to April [18]. Mating behavior was observed
from November to April. No males are available to mate females when male Rusa deer have
velvet antlers. Males are presumed to be sexually active and fertile in the hard antlers
stage [18]. From these observations in Kasetsart
University, Kamphaeng Saen Campus, Thailand, the breeding season and non-breeding season
were determined during November to April and May to October, respectively, in the present
study.For each female, baseline progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites values were calculated
using an iterative process in which values that exceeded the mean plus 1.5 standard
deviations (SD) were excluded. This process was recalculated until no values could be
removed. Baseline values were those remaining after exclusion of all high values [4, 22]. Fecal
concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites during pregnancy were not
included in calculation of baseline value. The difference in fecal concentrations of
progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites in the breeding season (November-April) and the
non-breeding season (May-October) was compared using a two sample Student
t-test. The ovarian activity was defined as the fecal concentrations of
progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites. If the values of progesterone metabolite were
greater than the baseline, they were considered as a luteal phase, while the values were
less than the baseline progesterone values, they were considered as an inter-luteal phase.
[13]. Fecal concentrations of progesterone and
17β-estradiol metabolites were compared by using the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
followed by Duncan’s multiple comparison tests. The data were presented as mean ± standard
errors for mean (SEM). An analysis of hormone concentrations was performed using SPSS (SPASS
Inc., Chicago, IL, U.S.A.). Values of P<0.05 were considered
statistically significant.
RESULTS
Characterization of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites assays:
Displacement curves obtained for fecal samples of female Rusa deer in the progesterone
metabolites EIA and 17β-estradiol metabolites RIA are shown in Fig. 2. In the progesterone EIA, addition of fecal sample of two female Rusa deer resulted in
displacement of progesterone tracer in a dose-response manner. Dose-dependent curves of
serially diluted fecal samples showed parallelism to the standard curves of progesterone
(Fig. 2a). In the 17β-estradiol metabolites RIA
addition of fecal samples of two female Rusa deer also resulted in displacement of
17β-estradiol tracer. There was a good dose-response relationship between the standard curve
of 17β-estradiol and fecal samples (Fig.
2b).
Fig. 2.
Dose response curves of fecal samples of Rusa deer in progesterone enzyme immunoassay
(a) and in 17β-estradiol radioimmunoassay (b). Each value represents the mean of
duplicate determinations in Rusa deer fecal samples (▲, □) and triplicate
determinations in standard (□).
Dose response curves of fecal samples of Rusa deer in progesterone enzyme immunoassay
(a) and in 17β-estradiol radioimmunoassay (b). Each value represents the mean of
duplicate determinations in Rusa deer fecal samples (▲, □) and triplicate
determinations in standard (□).Fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites during the late
stage of pregnancy and postpartum: At the beginning of the study, three hinds
were pregnant. Mean fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites of
three animals during the late stage of pregnancy period and the postpartum period after
delivery are shown in Fig.3. The highest progesterone concentration was shown in the late stage of pregnancy,
followed by a sharp decline around delivery (data not shown). The concentrations of
progesterone metabolite during the late stage of pregnancy were 37.4–21.54 times greater
than baseline and significantly higher than that of the postpartum period. On the other
hand, the fecal concentration of 17β-estradiol metabolite increased during the late stage of
pregnancy and peaked on the day of parturition and followed by a decline after delivery
(data not shown). Peak concentrations of fecal 17β-estradiol metabolite on the late
pregnancy were 4.56–5.97 times greater than baseline and significantly higher than that of
the postpartum period.
Fig. 3.
Mean (± SEM) of fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites
during the late stage of pregnancy (n=13) and postpartum (n=143). Different letters
indicate significant differences among period (P<0.05) by Duncan’s
multiple comparison tests.
Mean (± SEM) of fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites
during the late stage of pregnancy (n=13) and postpartum (n=143). Different letters
indicate significant differences among period (P<0.05) by Duncan’s
multiple comparison tests.Fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites in the lactating
and non-lactating animals: Fecal concentrations of progesterone and
17β-estradiol metabolites in lactating and non-lactating hinds are shown in Fig. 4. Fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites in non-lactating
groups were significantly higher than lactating groups (P<0.05). Fecal
concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites of lactating and non-lactating
hinds in the breeding season and the non-breeding season are shown in Fig. 5. The fecal concentration of progesterone metabolite of the lactating hinds in
non-breeding season was significantly higher than that in breeding season. It is also true
in the non-lactating groups (Fig. 5a). In
contrast, on fecal concentration of 17β-estradiol metabolite in non-lactating groups, the
level in the breeding season was significantly higher than that in non-breeding season
(Fig. 5b). In the lactating groups, the fecal
concentration of 17β-estradiol metabolite tends to be higher in the breeding season than
non-breeding season, but there was no significant difference between two groups (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 4.
Mean (± SEM) of fecal concentrations of progesterone (a) and 17β-estradiol (b)
metabolites between lactating (n=143) and non-lactating (n=104) Rusa hinds. Different
letters indicate significant differences between each hind
(P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple comparison tests.
Fig. 5.
Mean (± SEM) of fecal concentrations of progesterone (a) and 17β-estradiol (b)
metabolites in lactating (■; n=77, □; n=60) and non-lactating (■; n=66, □; n=44) Rusa
hinds. The black and white bars indicate the breeding season and non-breeding season,
respectively. The data during pregnant stages were not included. Asterisks represent
significant difference between the breeding and non-breeding seasons
(P<0.05), and different letters represent significant
differences within lactating and non-lactating hinds (P<0.05) by
Duncan’s multiple comparison tests.
Mean (± SEM) of fecal concentrations of progesterone (a) and 17β-estradiol (b)
metabolites between lactating (n=143) and non-lactating (n=104) Rusa hinds. Different
letters indicate significant differences between each hind
(P<0.05) by Duncan’s multiple comparison tests.Mean (± SEM) of fecal concentrations of progesterone (a) and 17β-estradiol (b)
metabolites in lactating (■; n=77, □; n=60) and non-lactating (■; n=66, □; n=44) Rusa
hinds. The black and white bars indicate the breeding season and non-breeding season,
respectively. The data during pregnant stages were not included. Asterisks represent
significant difference between the breeding and non-breeding seasons
(P<0.05), and different letters represent significant
differences within lactating and non-lactating hinds (P<0.05) by
Duncan’s multiple comparison tests.Correlation plots of fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites in
all Rusa hinds are shown in Fig. 6. The fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites were
significant negative correlation. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient was
r=−0.12, n=247 (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Correlation plots of fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol
metabolites in Rusa hind. The data during pregnant stages were not included.
Correlation plots of fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol
metabolites in Rusa hind. The data during pregnant stages were not included.
DISCUSSION
Reproductive information is essential for the development of management strategies of
species in captivity. It can be adapted in conservation programs to other endangered
species. In the present study, the reproductive cycle of Rusa deer in Thailand was
investigated by monitoring annual fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol
metabolites. Three of five female Rusa deer were pregnant at the beginning of the present
study. Therefore, fecal concentrations of progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites were
monitored during the late pregnant, lactating and non-lactating periods. These results
demonstrated that concentrations of fecal progesterone metabolite were high in the late
pregnancy and abruptly declined to the baseline level around parturition. Peak levels of
fecal concentration of progesterone in the late pregnancy were averaging about more than 20
times high as compared with the level in the lactating period. These results strongly
suggested that the placenta of Rusa deer secretes a large amount of progesterone. On the
other hand, fecal concentration of 17β-estradiol began to increase in the late pregnancy,
remained elevated at the day of parturition and then decreased to the baseline level in the
lactating period. In mammals, estrogens were increase during pregnancy, especially in late
pregnancy, such as domestic ungulates (mares [15] and
goats [12]), laboratory rodents (rats [25] and golden hamster [17]) or wild mammals (Japanese monkeys [16,
23], red deer [2], white-tail deer [10] and reindeer
[20]). High levels of circulating estrogens promote
production of oxytocin receptor [34] and relaxin
receptor [6] to assist preparation of the reproductive
tract for parturition and subsequently lactation. These results suggest that early
follicular development occurs during the postpartum period in this deer, such as mares
[15] and rats [25]. A future study will examine ovarian follicular development using
ultrasonography to determine if a similar postpartum ovarian activity exists in Rusa
deer.In the previous study, the estrous cycle length during the breeding season of the female
Rusa deer, inhabiting tropical Peninsular Malaysia, was 19.2 days, based on plasma
concentration of progesterone [14]. A future study
will examine detail pattern of fecal progesterone and 17β-estradiol metabolites by more
frequent sampling to determine exact the estrous cycle length of Rusa deer in Thailand. The
previous study demonstrated that male Rusa deer have a clear seasonality of reproductive
function with their antler growth cycle [18]. Male
Rusa deer showed most mating activity between November and April concomitant with timing of
hard antler periods. In the hard antler periods, circulating testosterone increased, and
males became aggressive [18]. These results
demonstrate that the mating period of Rusa hind in Thailand is from November to April. In
the present study, therefore, the breeding season was determined during November and April,
and the non-breeding season was during May and October. Similar characteristic in
reproduction of Rusa deer was also confirmed in Malaysia [Personal communication with Prof.
Abd Wahid Haron, Jabatan Pengajian Klinikal Veterinar, Fakulti Perubatan Veterinar,
Universiti Putra Malaysia].In the present study, during the postpartum period, fecal concentrations of progesterone
and 17β-estradiol metabolites in lactating hinds were lower than non-lactating hinds. These
results indicated that ovarian activity of lactating hinds is suppressed by the suckling
stimulus of fawn during lactation. The secretion of progesterone and 17β-estradiol is
depressed by the suckling stimuli of a fawn through the suppression of secretion of
kisspeptin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone from the hypothalamus, and the secretion of
gonadotropins from pituitary gland [26, 28, 32, 33]. The suckling stimulus by the fawn also promotes the
hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis [1, 26, 27]. Different
hormone concentrations in individual hind are also affected by nutrients and body weight
[7, 8, 19, 21, 31]. The present study suggested that Rusa hinds have the
ability to breed the early stages of lactation as well as rats [25] and mares [17]. More studies
are required to clarify mechanism responsible for postpartum ovarian function during
lactation in this species.In summary, the present study suggests that female Rusa deer is not seasonal breeder
whereas male Rusa deer is strongly seasonal in Thailand. The present findings suggest that
female Rusa deer may be possible to utilize assisted reproductive techniques procedures
throughout the year. With this information, future studies will focus on developing
techniques, such as artificial insemination and embryo transfer, to create genetically
healthy population and produce offspring for future reintroduction of endangered deer. In
addition, non-invasive technique of measuring fecal steroid hormones is a useful method for
evaluating reproductive endocrinology in Rusa deer.
Authors: K Ohshima; K Ohshima; K Y Arai; H Kishi; M Itoh; G Watanabe; P F Terranova; K Arai; K Uehara; N P Groome; K Taya Journal: J Endocrinol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 4.286
Authors: E Ropstad; V Veiberg; H Säkkinen; E Dahl; H Kindahl; O Holand; J F Beckers; E Eloranta Journal: Theriogenology Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Mohamed M M Kandiel; Gen Watanabe; Gamal A Sosa; Mahmoud E A Abou El-Roos; Alaa E Abdel-Ghaffar; Jun Y Li; Noboru Manabe; Abd El Salam I El Azab; Kazuyoshi Taya Journal: J Reprod Dev Date: 2009-12-25 Impact factor: 2.214