M S Chung1, K L Cheng2, Y J Choi3, J L Roh4, Y S Lee4, S S Lee1, J H Lee1, J H Baek1. 1. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 86 Asanbyeongwon-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Medical Imaging, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, 110 Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan; School of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, 110 Jianguo North Road, Taichung, Taiwan; Department of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, 145 Xingda Rd, Taichung, Taiwan. 3. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 86 Asanbyeongwon-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jehee23@gmail.com. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 86 Asanbyeongwon-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
AIM: To determine the interobserver reproducibility of measuring cervical lymph nodes at computed tomography (CT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to investigate the influence of finding extracapsular spread (ECS) at CT on measurement reliability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and informed consent was obtained. A total of 146 patients with 224 suspicious lymph nodes underwent CT before treatment. Two observers independently measured the diameters (minimal axial, maximum axial, and maximum longitudinal diameter) and assessed the ECS using CT. The greatest diameter was defined as the largest among the three measured diameters. Interobserver variability was determined by the within-subject coefficient of variation, and interobserver agreement was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The within-subject coefficients of variation were 7.8%, 7.6%, and 11.4% for the minimal axial, maximum axial, and greatest diameters, respectively. The ICC values for interobserver agreement were excellent for all diameter measurements (i.e., ICC >0.9). Minimum and maximum axial diameter measurements were statistically more reliable than the greatest diameter measurement (p=0.008 and p=0.0001, respectively). The presence of ECS on CT does not significantly affect the reliability of lymph node diameter measurements (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Lymph node diameter measurement on CT is a highly reproducible and robust method. Additionally, imaging features of ECS do not affect reliability. Therefore, the measurement of lymph node diameter can be confidently performed in daily clinical practice or clinical trials.
AIM: To determine the interobserver reproducibility of measuring cervical lymph nodes at computed tomography (CT) in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and to investigate the influence of finding extracapsular spread (ECS) at CT on measurement reliability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and informed consent was obtained. A total of 146 patients with 224 suspicious lymph nodes underwent CT before treatment. Two observers independently measured the diameters (minimal axial, maximum axial, and maximum longitudinal diameter) and assessed the ECS using CT. The greatest diameter was defined as the largest among the three measured diameters. Interobserver variability was determined by the within-subject coefficient of variation, and interobserver agreement was determined by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The within-subject coefficients of variation were 7.8%, 7.6%, and 11.4% for the minimal axial, maximum axial, and greatest diameters, respectively. The ICC values for interobserver agreement were excellent for all diameter measurements (i.e., ICC >0.9). Minimum and maximum axial diameter measurements were statistically more reliable than the greatest diameter measurement (p=0.008 and p=0.0001, respectively). The presence of ECS on CT does not significantly affect the reliability of lymph node diameter measurements (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Lymph node diameter measurement on CT is a highly reproducible and robust method. Additionally, imaging features of ECS do not affect reliability. Therefore, the measurement of lymph node diameter can be confidently performed in daily clinical practice or clinical trials.