Literature DB >> 27569276

Risk of perioperative bleeding related to highly selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Choochai Teerawattananon1, Pongchirat Tantayakom2, Bundarika Suwanawiboon3, Wanruchada Katchamart4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several literatures reported that highly selective cycloxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2 inhibitors) had no effect on platelet function. However, some experts suggested stopping all non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), including COX-2 inhibitors at least five elimination half-lives prior to surgery. We, therefore, systematically summarized the risk of clinical bleeding or platelet dysfunction in healthy or surgical subjects who received COX-2 inhibitors.
METHODS: Two electronic databases, MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched for randomized, controlled studies published during 1980-December 2015. Additionally, manual search was performed to identify potential eligible studies. Intervention was perioperative use of any available COX-2 inhibitors in current practice (celecoxib, parecoxib, or etoricoxib), compared to non-selective NSAIDs, analgesics, or placebo. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies, extracted the data, and assessed the quality of the included studies. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding. All analyses were performed using RevMan-5.3.
RESULTS: Of 3900 abstracts reviewed, 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. The data from 16 out of 35 studies were used in this meta-analysis, and outcomes of other 19 remaining studies were descriptively summarized. COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly increase the risk of postoperative bleeding events (relative risk or RR = 0.92; 95% confidence interval or CI: 0.63-1.33; p = 0.65), intraoperative blood loss (mL) (weighted mean difference or WMD = -4.38; 95% CI: -14.69 to 5.92; p = 0.4), postoperative blood loss (mL) (WMD = -13.89; 95% CI: -30.24 to 2.47; p = 0.10), and 24-h postoperative hemoglobin loss (g/dL) (WMD = 0.47; 95% CI: -0.14 to 1.09; p = 0.13). Platelet function analyzer closure time (second) significantly decreased with the use of COX-2 inhibitors (WMD = -22.22; 95% CI: -44.03 to -0.41; p < 0.00001). In the 19 remaining studies, COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly increase risk of bleeding in both clinical and laboratory outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Highly selective COX-2 inhibitors did not significantly increase the risk of intraoperative, postoperative bleeding, or blood loss. They also had no significant effect on platelet function. Therefore, perioperative, single dose, or short course of COX-2 inhibitors can be safely used in individuals who are undergoing surgery.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Highly selective COX-2 inhibitor; Non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; Periooperative bleeding; Platelet function; Systematic review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27569276     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  10 in total

Review 1.  The prescription opioid crisis: role of the anaesthesiologist in reducing opioid use and misuse.

Authors:  Ellen M Soffin; Bradley H Lee; Kanupriya K Kumar; Christopher L Wu
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 2.  Regional anesthesia and acute perioperative pain management in thoracic surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Casey Hamilton; Paul Alfille; Jeremi Mountjoy; Xiaodong Bao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children.

Authors:  Stefan J Friedrichsdorf; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-12-19

Review 4.  [Pediatric pain treatment and prevention for hospitalized children].

Authors:  Stefan J Friedrichsdorf; Liesbet Goubert
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Hemorrhagic complications associated with suprachoroidal buckling.

Authors:  Fares Antaki; Ali Dirani; Marina Ravagnani Ciongoli; David H W Steel; Flavio Rezende
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2020-04-16

Review 6.  Perioperative Considerations for Antithrombotic Therapy in Oculofacial Surgery: A Review of Current Evidence and Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Christian Kim; Margaret L Pfeiffer; Jessica R Chang; Michael A Burnstine
Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.011

Review 7.  Intravenous Parecoxib for Pain Relief after Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaofei Li; Pengxiang Zhou; Zhengqian Li; Huilin Tang; Suodi Zhai
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-06-15

8.  Implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in gynecologic oncology.

Authors:  Tanvi V Joshi; Shaina F Bruce; Rod Grim; Tommy Buchanan; Sudeshna Chatterjee-Paer; Elizabeth R Burton; Joel I Sorosky; Mark S Shahin; Mitchell I Edelson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2021-04-30

Review 9.  Perioperative Management of Patients with Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases Undergoing Major Orthopaedic Surgery: A Practical Overview.

Authors:  Roberta Gualtierotti; Marco Parisi; Francesca Ingegnoli
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.845

10.  Efficacy of an opioid-sparing analgesic protocol in pain control after less invasive cranial neurosurgery.

Authors:  Shahjehan Ahmad; Ryan Khanna; Alvin Chidozie Onyewuenyi; Nicholas Panos; Rory Breslin; Sepehr Sani
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-08-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.