Identification of CD177 as the most dysregulated parameter in a microarray study of purified neutrophils from septic shock patients.

Sepsis represents the host's systemic inflammatory response to an infection. In this condition, immune response associates a marked inflammatory response and the delayed development of severe dysfunctions affecting both innate and adaptive responses. As neutrophils are the first line of defense against infection, they are central to the pathophysiology of sepsis in first hours. Nevertheless, their role during immunosuppression phase remains elusive. The main objective of the current work was to perform a transcriptomic study on purified neutrophils from septic shock patients (n=9) so as to identify genes that are differentially expressed during the first week after disease onset both (3-4 and 6-8days) versus healthy donors. Then, 45 septic shock patients were prospectively enrolled to confirm results at the protein level using flow cytometry. Twenty healthy volunteers (HV) were also included for the whole study. By comparing the transcriptome of purified neutrophils, we identified 364 up-regulated and 328 down-regulated genes differentially expressed. Of them, CD177 mRNA, coding for an activation molecule in chemotaxis, had the highest fold change modulation between patients and HV. This increase was then confirmed at the protein level. There was a constant subset of neutrophils that did not express CD177. However, when positive, septic neutrophils presented with significantly increased CD177 expression. Of note, no association between CD177 overexpression and features of immunosuppression has been highlighted. In addition, this up-regulation was negatively correlated with a decreased expression of CD10, a characteristic of immature myeloid cells. In conclusion, in this exploratory work, we shed light on the increased CD177 mRNA and protein expressions in circulating neutrophils after septic shock. Considering the potential dual roles of CD177 neutrophil (i.e., maturation/chemotaxis), negatively correlated in this study, its participation in septic shock pathophysiology deserves further investigation. Furthermore, its potential as a biomarker for sepsis would deserve to be investigated in large cohorts of patients.