Literature DB >> 27568598

Effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsies-An Italian observational multicenter study.

P De Liso1, F Vigevano2, N Specchio2, L De Palma2, P Bonanni3, E Osanni3, G Coppola4, P Parisi5, S Grosso6, A Verrotti7, A Spalice8, F Nicita8, N Zamponi9, S Siliquini9, L Giordano10, P Martelli10, R Guerrini11, A Rosati11, L Ilvento11, V Belcastro12, P Striano13, M S Vari13, G Capovilla14, F Beccaria14, O Bruni15, A Luchetti15, G Gobbi16, A Russo16, D Pruna17, A E Tozzi18, R Cusmai2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of Perampanel (PER) in children and adolescents with refractory epilepsies in daily clinical practice conditions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This Italian multicenter retrospective observational study was performed in 16 paediatric epilepsy centres. Inclusion criteria were: (i) ≤18 years of age, (ii) history of refractory epilepsy, (iii) a follow-up ≥5 months of PER add-on therapy. Exclusion criteria were: (i) a diagnosis of primary idiopathic generalized epilepsy, (ii) variation of concomitant AEDs during the previous 4 weeks. Response was defined as a ≥50% reduction in monthly seizure frequency compared with the baseline.
RESULTS: 62 patients suffering from various refractory epilepsies were included in this study: 53% were males, the mean age was 14.2 years (range 6-18 years), 8 patients aged <12 years. Mean age at epilepsy onset was 3.4 years and the mean duration of epilepsy was 10.8 years (range 1-16), which ranged from 2 seizures per-month up to several seizures per-day (mean number=96.5). Symptomatic focal epilepsy was reported in 62.9% of cases. Mean number of AEDs used in the past was 7.1; mean number of concomitant AEDs was 2.48, with carbamazepine used in 43.5% of patients. Mean PER daily dose was 7.1mg (2-12mg). After an average of 6.6 months of follow-up (5-13 months), the retention rate was 77.4% (48/62). The response rate was 50%; 16% of patients achieved ≥75% seizure frequency reduction and 5% became completely seizure free. Seizure aggravation was observed in 9.7% of patients. Adverse events were reported in 19 patients (30.6%) and led to PER discontinuation in 4 patients (6.5%). The most common adverse events were behaviour disturbance (irritability and aggressiveness), dizziness, sedation and fatigue.
CONCLUSION: PER was found to be a safe and effective treatment when used as adjunctive therapy in paediatric patients with uncontrolled epilepsy.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Antiepileptic drug; Children; Perampanel; Refractory epilepsy; Treatment outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27568598     DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2016.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  14 in total

1.  Perampanel reduces paroxysmal depolarizing shift and inhibitory synaptic input in excitatory neurons to inhibit epileptic network oscillations.

Authors:  Ya-Chin Yang; Guan-Hsun Wang; Ai-Yu Chuang; Shu-Wei Hsueh
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  The Challenge of Pharmacotherapy in Children and Adolescents with Epilepsy-ADHD Comorbidity.

Authors:  Alberto Verrotti; Romina Moavero; Gianvito Panzarino; Claudia Di Paolantonio; Renata Rizzo; Paolo Curatolo
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 3.  Pharmacokinetics and Drug Interaction of Antiepileptic Drugs in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Giulia Iapadre; Ganna Balagura; Luca Zagaroli; Pasquale Striano; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.022

4.  Successful use of perampanel in GABRA1-related myoclonic epilepsy with photosensitivity.

Authors:  Sara Olivotto; Anna Freddi; Rossella Lavatelli; Eleonora Basso; Alessia Leidi; Barbara Castellotti; Luigina Spaccini; Stefania Maria Bova; Pierangelo Veggiotti
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav Rep       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  Simple and rapid validated HPLC-fluorescence determination of perampanel in the plasma of patients with epilepsy.

Authors:  Susan Mohamed; Carmina Candela; Roberto Riva; Manuela Contin
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2017-11-26

6.  Preliminary Asian experience of using perampanel in clinical practice.

Authors:  Hsing-I Chiang; Siew-Na Lim; Hsiang-Yao Hsieh; Mei-Yun Cheng; Chun-Wei Chang; Wei-En Johnny Tseng; Han-Tao Li; Chin-Yin Lin; Tony Wu
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.910

7.  Adverse Events During Perampanel Adjunctive Therapy in Intractable Epilepsy.

Authors:  Song Ee Youn; Se Hee Kim; Ara Ko; Sun Ho Lee; Young Mock Lee; Hoon Chul Kang; Joon Soo Lee; Heung Dong Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.077

8.  Clinical Experience with Perampanel in Intractable Focal Epilepsy Over 12 Months of Follow-Up.

Authors:  Soo Yeon Kim; Woo Joong Kim; Hyuna Kim; Sun Ah Choi; Byung Chan Lim; Jong-Hee Chae; Ki Joong Kim
Journal:  J Epilepsy Res       Date:  2018-12-31

Review 9.  Current role of perampanel in pediatric epilepsy.

Authors:  Paola De Liso; Romina Moavero; Giangennaro Coppola; Paolo Curatolo; Raffaella Cusmai; Giovambattista De Sarro; Emilio Franzoni; Federico Vigevano; Alberto Verrotti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 10.  Benign and severe early-life seizures: a round in the first year of life.

Authors:  Piero Pavone; Giovanni Corsello; Martino Ruggieri; Silvia Marino; Simona Marino; Raffaele Falsaperla
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.