Literature DB >> 27568281

The impact of various preanalytical treatments on the phenotype of small extracellular vesicles in blood analyzed by protein microarray.

Rikke Bæk1, Evo K L Søndergaard2, Kim Varming2, Malene M Jørgensen2.   

Abstract

The research field of extracellular vesicles (EVs) is increasing immensely and the potential uses of EVs seem endless. They are found in large numbers in various body fluids, and blood samples may well serve as liquid biopsies. However, these small membrane-derived entities of cellular origin are not straightforward to work with in regard to isolation and characterization. A broad range of relevant preanalytical issues was tested, with a focus on the phenotypic impact of smaller EVs. The influences of the i) blood collection tube used, ii) incubation time before the initial centrifugation, iii) transportation/physical stress, iv) storage temperature and time (short term and long term), v) choice of centrifugation protocol, vi) freeze-thaw cycles, and vii) exosome isolation procedure (ExoQuick™) were examined. To identify the impact of the preanalytical treatments, the relative amounts (detected signal intensities of CD9-, CD63- and/or CD81-positive) and phenotypes of small EVs were analyzed using the multiplexed antibody-based microarray technology, termed the EV Array. The analysis encompassed 15 surface- or surface-related markers, including CD9, CD63, CD81, CD142, and Annexin V. This study revealed that samples collected in different blood collection tubes suffered to varying degrees from the preanalytical treatments tested here. There is no unequivocal answer to the questions asked. However, in general, the period of time and prospective transportation before the initial centrifugation, choice of centrifugation protocol, and storage temperature were observed to have major impacts on the samples. On the contrary, long-term storage and freeze-thawing seemed to not have a critical influence. Hence, there are pros and cons of any choice regarding sample collection and preparation and may very well be analysis dependent. However, to compare samples and results, it is important to ensure that all samples are of the same type and have been handled similarly.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EV Array; Phenotyping; Preanalytical aspects; Protein microarray; Small extracellular vesicles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27568281     DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2016.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  35 in total

Review 1.  Preservation and Storage Stability of Extracellular Vesicles for Therapeutic Applications.

Authors:  Anjana Jeyaram; Steven M Jay
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Human Plasma Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Proteomic Characterization for the Optimization of Liquid Biopsy in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Antonia Reale; Tiffany Khong; Rong Xu; Maoshan Chen; Sridurga Mithraprabhu; Nicholas Bingham; Andrew Spencer; David W Greening
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

3.  Isolation and characterization of extracellular vesicle subpopulations from tissues.

Authors:  Rossella Crescitelli; Cecilia Lässer; Jan Lötvall
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Advances of exosome isolation techniques in lung cancer.

Authors:  Elham O Mahgoub; Ehsan Razmara; Amirreza Bitaraf; Fahimeh-Sadat Norouzi; Maryam Montazeri; Roudabeh Behzadi-Andouhjerdi; Mojtaba Falahati; Ke Cheng; Yousif Haik; Anwarul Hasan; Sadegh Babashah
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Spinal cord injury alters microRNA and CD81+ exosome levels in plasma extracellular nanoparticles with neuroinflammatory potential.

Authors:  Niaz Z Khan; Tuoxin Cao; Junyun He; Rodney M Ritzel; Yun Li; Rebecca J Henry; Courtney Colson; Bogdan A Stoica; Alan I Faden; Junfang Wu
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 7.217

6.  Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Based on Ultracentrifugation.

Authors:  Adriana Torres Crigna; Fabia Fricke; Katja Nitschke; Thomas Worst; Ulrike Erb; Michael Karremann; Dominik Buschmann; Susanne Elvers-Hornung; Christine Tucher; Martin Schiller; Ingrid Hausser; Johannes Gebert; Karen Bieback
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 7.  Extracellular vesicles and female reproduction.

Authors:  Ronit Machtinger; Andrea A Baccarelli; Haotian Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Jia-Kun Li; Cheng Yang; Ying Su; Jing-Chao Luo; Ming-Hao Luo; Dan-Lei Huang; Guo-Wei Tu; Zhe Luo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 8.786

Review 9.  Extracellular vesicles in urological malignancies.

Authors:  Michael P Rimmer; Christopher D Gregory; Rod T Mitchell
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 10.680

Review 10.  Preserving extracellular vesicles for biomedical applications: consideration of storage stability before and after isolation.

Authors:  Fumin Yuan; Ya-Min Li; Zhuhui Wang
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.