Literature DB >> 27567799

Comparison of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging & Quantification (VTIQ) and Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (VTQ) for diagnosis of thyroid nodules.

Yu-Ping Yang1,2,3,4, Xiao-Hong Xu1, Xiao-Wan Bo2,3,4, Bo-Ji Liu2,3,4, Le-Hang Guo2,3,4, Jun-Mei Xu2,3,4, Li-Ping Sun2,3,4, Hui-Xiong Xu2,3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging & Quantification (VTIQ) and Virtual Touch Tissue Quantification (VTQ) in differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodules (TNs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study 107 TNs in 107 patients were enrolled and analyzed. All of them were detected by conventional ultrasound (US) and confirmed by fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy or surgery. VTIQ and VTQ examinations were performed on each nodule. Thereafter the median and mean of shear wave speed (SWS) values in lesions on VTIQ and VTQ were computed (SWS-median and SWS-mean). With cytological results of FNA and histological results adopted as the reference standard, area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of VTIQ and VTQ in differentiation of TNs.
RESULTS: Among the 107 lesions, 19 were papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs), 1 was medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and 87 were benign. In total lesions, AUROC-median in VTIQ was significantly higher than that in VTQ (0.851 vs.0.759; p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: VTIQ and VTQ were equivalent in diagnosing TNs when using SWS-mean, whereas VTIQ showed better performance in comparison with VTQ when using SWS-median.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shear wave elastography; diagnostic performance; fine-needle aspiration; thyroid nodules; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27567799     DOI: 10.3233/CH-16142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc        ISSN: 1386-0291            Impact factor:   2.375


  7 in total

1.  Can virtual touch tissue imaging quantification be a reliable method to detect anterior talofibular ligament type I injury at the acute, subacute, and chronic stages?

Authors:  Xiu Chen; Liang Wang; Xiuyun Li; Pinguo Fu; Maosheng Xu; Chunpeng Zou; Xingwang Li; Yanyan Dong
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

2.  Does acoustic radiation force elastography improve the diagnostic capability of ultrasound in the preoperative characterization of masses of the parotid gland?

Authors:  Pamela Zengel; Florian Notter; Dirk A Clevert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 3.  Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lymph Nodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peige Zhang; Li Zhang; Shaoping Zheng; Cheng Yu; Mingxing Xie; Qing Lv
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Association between BRAF V600E Mutation and Ultrasound Features in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients with and without Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.

Authors:  Qin Zhang; Bo-Ji Liu; Wei-Wei Ren; Ya-Ping He; Xiao-Long Li; Chong-Ke Zhao; Yi-Feng Zhang; Wen-Wen Yue; Jia-Yi Zheng; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  VTIQ evaluates antitumor effects of NET-1 siRNA by UTMD in HCC xenograft models.

Authors:  Xitian Liang; Bolin Wu; Haitao Shang; Xue Han; Hui Jing; Yixin Sun; Wen Cheng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Ultrasound elastography of the thyroid: principles and current status.

Authors:  Chong-Ke Zhao; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2018-10-01

7.  Normal values of shear wave velocity in liver tissue of healthy children measured using the latest acoustic radiation force impulse technology.

Authors:  Pei-Xuan Sun; Yu-Yang Tong; Jing Shi; Huan Zhang; Shi-Jian Liu; Jun Du
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.337

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.