| Literature DB >> 27567734 |
Guoyan Zheng1, Chengwen Chu2, Daniel L Belavý3, Bulat Ibragimov4, Robert Korez5, Tomaž Vrtovec5, Hugo Hutt6, Richard Everson6, Judith Meakin6, Isabel Lŏpez Andrade7, Ben Glocker7, Hao Chen8, Qi Dou8, Pheng-Ann Heng8, Chunliang Wang9, Daniel Forsberg10, Aleš Neubert11, Jurgen Fripp12, Martin Urschler13, Darko Stern14, Maria Wimmer15, Alexey A Novikov15, Hui Cheng2, Gabriele Armbrecht16, Dieter Felsenberg16, Shuo Li17.
Abstract
The evaluation of changes in Intervertebral Discs (IVDs) with 3D Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging (MRI) can be of interest for many clinical applications. This paper presents the evaluation of both IVD localization and IVD segmentation methods submitted to the Automatic 3D MRI IVD Localization and Segmentation challenge, held at the 2015 International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI2015) with an on-site competition. With the construction of a manually annotated reference data set composed of 25 3D T2-weighted MR images acquired from two different studies and the establishment of a standard validation framework, quantitative evaluation was performed to compare the results of methods submitted to the challenge. Experimental results show that overall the best localization method achieves a mean localization distance of 0.8 mm and the best segmentation method achieves a mean Dice of 91.8%, a mean average absolute distance of 1.1 mm and a mean Hausdorff distance of 4.3 mm, respectively. The strengths and drawbacks of each method are discussed, which provides insights into the performance of different IVD localization and segmentation methods.Entities:
Keywords: Challenge; Evaluation; Intervertebral disc; Localization; MRI; Segmentation
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27567734 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Image Anal ISSN: 1361-8415 Impact factor: 8.545