Literature DB >> 27567451

Gait event detection in laboratory and real life settings: Accuracy of ankle and waist sensor based methods.

Fabio A Storm1, Christopher J Buckley2, Claudia Mazzà3.   

Abstract

Wearable sensors technology based on inertial measurement units (IMUs) is leading the transition from laboratory-based gait analysis, to daily life gait monitoring. However, the validity of IMU-based methods for the detection of gait events has only been tested in laboratory settings, which may not reproduce real life walking patterns. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of two algorithms for the detection of gait events and temporal parameters during free-living walking, one based on two shank-worn inertial sensors, and the other based on one waist-worn sensor. The algorithms were applied to gait data of ten healthy subjects walking both indoor and outdoor, and completing protocols that entailed both straight supervised and free walking in an urban environment. The values obtained from the inertial sensors were compared to pressure insoles data. The shank-based method showed very accurate initial contact, stride time and step time estimation (<14ms error). Accuracy of final contact timings and stance time was lower (28-51ms error range). The error of temporal parameter variability estimates was in the range 0.09-0.89%. The waist method failed to detect about 1% of the total steps and performed worse than the shank method, but the temporal parameter estimation was still satisfactory. Both methods showed negligible differences in their accuracy when the different experimental conditions were compared, which suggests their applicability in the analysis of free-living gait.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Algorithm; Free walking; Gait events; Inertial sensor; Temporal parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27567451     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  33 in total

Review 1.  A Roadmap to Inform Development, Validation and Approval of Digital Mobility Outcomes: The Mobilise-D Approach.

Authors:  Lynn Rochester; Claudia Mazzà; Arne Mueller; Brian Caulfield; Marie McCarthy; Clemens Becker; Ram Miller; Paolo Piraino; Marco Viceconti; Wilhelmus P Dartee; Judith Garcia-Aymerich; Aida A Aydemir; Beatrix Vereijken; Valdo Arnera; Nadir Ammour; Michael Jackson; Tilo Hache; Ronenn Roubenoff
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2020-11-26

2.  Inertial Sensor-Based Centripetal Acceleration as a Correlate for Lateral Margin of Stability During Walking and Turning.

Authors:  Peter C Fino; Fay B Horak; Carolin Curtze
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Gait event detection using inertial measurement units in people with transfemoral amputation: a comparative study.

Authors:  Emeline Simonetti; Coralie Villa; Joseph Bascou; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Elena Bergamini; Hélène Pillet
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  IMU-based gait analysis in lower limb prosthesis users: Comparison of step demarcation algorithms.

Authors:  Gerasimos Bastas; Joshua J Fleck; Richard A Peters; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Gait metrics analysis utilizing single-point inertial measurement units: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralph Jasper Mobbs; Jordan Perring; Suresh Mahendra Raj; Monish Maharaj; Nicole Kah Mun Yoong; Luke Wicent Sy; Rannulu Dineth Fonseka; Pragadesh Natarajan; Wen Jie Choy
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2022-01-20

6.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

7.  A New Proxy Measurement Algorithm with Application to the Estimation of Vertical Ground Reaction Forces Using Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Yuzhu Guo; Fabio Storm; Yifan Zhao; Stephen A Billings; Aleksandar Pavic; Claudia Mazzà; Ling-Zhong Guo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Estimation of spatio-temporal parameters of gait from magneto-inertial measurement units: multicenter validation among Parkinson, mildly cognitively impaired and healthy older adults.

Authors:  Matilde Bertoli; Andrea Cereatti; Diana Trojaniello; Laura Avanzino; Elisa Pelosin; Silvia Del Din; Lynn Rochester; Pieter Ginis; Esther M J Bekkers; Anat Mirelman; Jeffrey M Hausdorff; Ugo Della Croce
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Evaluating the Accuracy of Virtual Reality Trackers for Computing Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters.

Authors:  Michelangelo Guaitolini; Fitsum E Petros; Antonio Prado; Angelo M Sabatini; Sunil K Agrawal
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Free-living and laboratory gait characteristics in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Fabio A Storm; K P S Nair; Alison J Clarke; Jill M Van der Meulen; Claudia Mazzà
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.