Giuseppe Liotta1, Rónán O'Caoimh2, Francesco Gilardi3, Maria Grazia Proietti4, Gennaro Rocco5, Rosaria Alvaro6, Paola Scarcella7, D William Molloy8, Stefano Orlando9, Sandro Mancinelli10, Leonardo Palombi11, Alessandro Stievano12, Maria Cristina Marazzi13. 1. Biomedicine and Prevention Dept, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: giuseppe.liotta@uniroma2.it. 2. Health Research Board, Clinical Research Facility Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. Electronic address: rocaoimh@hotmail.com. 3. Biomedicine and Prevention Dept, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: francesco.gilardi@gmail.com. 4. IPASVI - Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Viale Giulio Cesare 78, 00192 Rome, Italy; Social Cooperative Nuova Sair, Viale del Tecnopolo 83, 00131 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: mariagrazia.proietti@nuovasair.it. 5. IPASVI - Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Viale Giulio Cesare 78, 00192 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: genna.rocco@gmail.com. 6. Biomedicine and Prevention Dept, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: rosaria.alvaro@gmail.com. 7. Biomedicine and Prevention Dept, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: paola.scarcella@gmail.com. 8. Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, University College Cork, St Finbarrs Hospital, Cork City, Ireland. Electronic address: w.molloy@ucc.ie. 9. Dept of Health Economics, Community of Sant'Egidio - DREAM program, Via San Gallicano 25, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: steorlando@gmail.com. 10. Biomedicine and Prevention Dept, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: sandro.mancinelli@gmail.com. 11. Biomedicine and Prevention Dept, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Via Montpellier 1, 00173, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: leonardo.palombi@gmail.com. 12. IPASVI - Centre of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship, Viale Giulio Cesare 78, 00192 Rome, Italy. Electronic address: astievano@tiscali.it. 13. LUMSA University, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: mcmarazzi@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The prevalence of frailty is expected to increase worldwide in parallel with demographic ageing. Despite this, little is known about the prevalence in different populations particularly community-based samples. This cross-sectional study evaluates the prevalence of frailty in a community-dwelling older adult population and describes a methodology to plan community-based interventions. METHODOLOGY: A random sample of 1331 older adults, resident in the Lazio-Region of Italy, were screened by trained public health nurses (PHNs) by administering a validated questionnaire (the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire). Prevalence of frailty was calculated using the Final Synthetic Score derived from the questionnaire's Final Score. Variables associated with frailty were selected through univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: Prevalence of frail (FS≥10,≤50) and very frail (FS<10) individuals was 13.9% and 7.6% respectively. Variables associated with frailty were age (older than 85 years), disability, living alone or the presence of a paid carer, lower education and neurological disorders like stroke, dementia, Parkinson disease and other neuropsychiatric diseases; Anaemia or cancer were also associated with a higher prevalence of frailty. DISCUSSION: The study provide a comprehensive picture of the prevalence of frailty and factors associated to this condition in community-dwelling older adults. On the basis of the study results, a plan of community-based services could address the needs of care of the elderly population. A trained team of PHNs may be the most appropriate personnel to carry out multidimensional frailty assessment in this setting. Copyright Â
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The prevalence of frailty is expected to increase worldwide in parallel with demographic ageing. Despite this, little is known about the prevalence in different populations particularly community-based samples. This cross-sectional study evaluates the prevalence of frailty in a community-dwelling older adult population and describes a methodology to plan community-based interventions. METHODOLOGY: A random sample of 1331 older adults, resident in the Lazio-Region of Italy, were screened by trained public health nurses (PHNs) by administering a validated questionnaire (the Functional Geriatric Evaluation questionnaire). Prevalence of frailty was calculated using the Final Synthetic Score derived from the questionnaire's Final Score. Variables associated with frailty were selected through univariate and multivariate statistical analysis. RESULTS: Prevalence of frail (FS≥10,≤50) and very frail (FS<10) individuals was 13.9% and 7.6% respectively. Variables associated with frailty were age (older than 85 years), disability, living alone or the presence of a paid carer, lower education and neurological disorders like stroke, dementia, Parkinson disease and other neuropsychiatric diseases; Anaemia or cancer were also associated with a higher prevalence of frailty. DISCUSSION: The study provide a comprehensive picture of the prevalence of frailty and factors associated to this condition in community-dwelling older adults. On the basis of the study results, a plan of community-based services could address the needs of care of the elderly population. A trained team of PHNs may be the most appropriate personnel to carry out multidimensional frailty assessment in this setting. Copyright Â
Keywords:
Community based interventions; Community-dwelling older adults; Frailty; Functional decline; Multidimensional assessment; Public health nurses
Authors: K Palmer; D L Vetrano; A Marengoni; A M Tummolo; E R Villani; N Acampora; R Bernabei; G Onder Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Ye Ruan; Yanfei Guo; Paul Kowal; Ye Lu; Chazhen Liu; Shuangyuan Sun; Zhezhou Huang; Yang Zheng; Wenjing Wang; Gan Li; Yan Shi; Fan Wu Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Maddalena Illario; Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten; D William Molloy; Enrica Menditto; Guido Iaccarino; Patrik Eklund Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2016-10-12
Authors: Fomba Louisette Naah; Aloysius Mom Njong; Jude Ndzifon Kimengsi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Francesco Gilardi; Paola Scarcella; Maria Grazia Proietti; Giovanni Capobianco; Gennaro Rocco; Alessandra Capanna; Sandro Mancinelli; Maria Cristina Marazzi; Leonardo Palombi; Giuseppe Liotta Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 3.367