Literature DB >> 27567177

Effects of immunosuppressive and biological agents on refractory Takayasu arteritis patients unresponsive to glucocorticoid treatment.

Hirokazu Ohigashi1, Natsuko Tamura2, Yusuke Ebana3, Masayoshi Harigai4, Yasuhiro Maejima2, Takashi Ashikaga2, Mitsuaki Isobe2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of immunosuppressive and biological agents on refractory Takayasu arteritis (TA) patients resistant to or dependent on glucocorticoids.
METHODS: Forty-four consecutive TA patients were enrolled, and the clinical characteristics and effectiveness of the immunosuppressive and biological agents in achieving and maintaining remission among glucocorticoid-resistant or glucocorticoid-dependent patients were investigated.
RESULTS: Fifteen patients showed favorable response to the initial glucocorticoid treatment, and 29 patients exhibited resistance to initial glucocorticoid treatment or relapsed with tapering glucocorticoid. Of the 29 patients, 5 responded to additional glucocorticoid treatment, and 22 of the remaining 24 glucocorticoid-resistant or glucocorticoid-dependent patients were prescribed immunosuppressive agents. Methotrexate was the most commonly used in these patients as the first-line treatment. In total, 10 patients maintained remission using immunosuppressive agents, with the effectiveness of each agent about 20%. The only significant difference between patients who were and were not able to achieve and maintain remission with immunosuppressive agents was the presence of the HLA-B52 allele (p<0.0001). Biological agents were administered to 6 patients refractory to immunosuppressive agents. All patients were administered tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors as the first-line treatment, and 3 patients maintained remission. Anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody was administered to 2 patients who were resistant to the TNF inhibitors, and 1 patient achieved and maintained remission.
CONCLUSION: In our cohort, 64% of the glucocorticoid-resistant or glucocorticoid-dependent patients maintained remission through a combined treatment with glucocorticoid, immunosuppressive agents, and/or biological agents. The combined use of immunosuppressive and biological agents appears to be a promising treatment option for achieving and maintaining remission in refractory TA patients.
Copyright © 2016 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biological agent; Immunosuppressive agents; Relapse; Takayasu arteritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27567177     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Effectiveness and safety of methotrexate versus leflunomide in 12-month treatment for Takayasu arteritis.

Authors:  Chunling Wu; Ying Sun; Xiaomeng Cui; Sifan Wu; Lili Ma; Huiyong Chen; Yan Yan; Zongfei Ji; Yun Liu; Jiang Lin; Peng Lv; Rongyi Chen; Pingting Yang; Lindi Jiang
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  IL-25 exacerbates autoimmune aortitis in IL-1 receptor antagonist-deficient mice.

Authors:  Takamichi Yoshizaki; Satoshi Itoh; Sachiko Yamaguchi; Takafumi Numata; Aya Nambu; Naoyuki Kimura; Hajime Suto; Ko Okumura; Katsuko Sudo; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Susumu Nakae
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for the management of Takayasu arteritis-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Upendra Rathore; Pallavi Patro; Vikas Agarwal; Aman Sharma
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Pathogenesis of liver injury in Takayasu arteritis: advanced understanding leads to new horizons.

Authors:  Kai Kang; Yue Sun; Yi Ling Li; Bing Chang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.671

Review 5.  Efficacy of tocilizumab for refractory Takayasu arteritis: a retrospective study and literature review.

Authors:  Haiyan Li; Zongwen Shuai
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Giant cell arteritis versus Takayasu's Arteritis: Two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Peter W Mortensen; Subahari Raviskanthan; Patricia Chévez-Barrios; Andrew G Lee
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-18

7.  Severe aortic regurgitation complicating Takayasu's arteritis.

Authors:  Wala M Alali; Saeed A Alahmari; Yahya S Alhebaishi; Seham A Alrashidi
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.484

8.  Management of Takayasu arteritis: a systematic literature review informing the 2018 update of the EULAR recommendation for the management of large vessel vasculitis.

Authors:  Ana F Águeda; Sara Monti; Raashid Ahmed Luqmani; Frank Buttgereit; Maria Cid; Bhaskar Dasgupta; Christian Dejaco; Alfred Mahr; Cristina Ponte; Carlo Salvarani; Wolfgang Schmidt; Bernhard Hellmich
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2019-09-23

Review 9.  Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis-Current and Future.

Authors:  B Hellmich; A F Águeda; S Monti; R Luqmani
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 4.592

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.