Literature DB >> 27567000

Changes in the quality of care during progress from stage 1 to stage 2 of Meaningful Use.

David M Levine1,2, Michael J Healey1, Adam Wright1,2, David W Bates1,2, Jeffrey A Linder1,2, Lipika Samal1,2.   

Abstract

Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) canceled Meaningful Use (MU), replacing it with Advancing Care Information, which preserves many MU elements. Therefore, transitioning from MU stage 1 to MU stage 2 has important implications for the new policy, yet the quality of care provided by physicians transitioning from MU1 to MU2 is unknown.
Methods: Retrospective longitudinal evaluation of the quality of care delivered by outpatient physicians at an academic medical center in the transition between MU1 and MU2.
Results: Between MU1 and MU2, 4 measures improved: hypertension control (35% vs 40%), influenza immunization (63% vs 68%), tobacco use assessment/counseling (86% vs 96%), and diabetes control (93% vs 96%; P all <.01). One worsened: senior weight screening/follow-up (54% vs 49%; P  < .01). Two were unchanged: chlamydia screening and adult weight screening/follow-up.
Conclusion: In this single-site study, when clinicians progressed from MU1 to MU2, 4 quality measures improved, 2 were unchanged, and 1 worsened. Analysis of national data should guide policy decisions about the content of MU's successor.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic health records; meaningful use; medical records; quality improvement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27567000      PMCID: PMC6080679          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocw127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  10 in total

1.  Electronic health records' limited successes suggest more targeted uses.

Authors:  Catherine M DesRoches; Eric G Campbell; Christine Vogeli; Jie Zheng; Sowmya R Rao; Alexandra E Shields; Karen Donelan; Sara Rosenbaum; Steffanie J Bristol; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Finding the meaning in meaningful use.

Authors:  David C Classen; David W Bates
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Using electronic health record clinical decision support is associated with improved quality of care.

Authors:  Rebecca G Mishuris; Jeffrey A Linder; David W Bates; Asaf Bitton
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; Catherine M DesRoches; Michael F Furukawa; Chantal Worzala; Dustin Charles; Peter Kralovec; Samantha Stalley; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  The meaningful use of electronic health records and health care quality.

Authors:  Lisa M Kern; Alison Edwards; Rainu Kaushal
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 6.  Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use.

Authors:  Spencer S Jones; Robert S Rudin; Tanja Perry; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Meaningful use and quality of care.

Authors:  Lipika Samal; Adam Wright; Michael J Healey; Jeffrey A Linder; David W Bates
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  US Physician Practices Spend More Than $15.4 Billion Annually To Report Quality Measures.

Authors:  Lawrence P Casalino; David Gans; Rachel Weber; Meagan Cea; Amber Tuchovsky; Tara F Bishop; Yesenia Miranda; Brittany A Frankel; Kristina B Ziehler; Meghan M Wong; Todd B Evenson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 9.  Effect of clinical decision-support systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tiffani J Bright; Anthony Wong; Ravi Dhurjati; Erin Bristow; Lori Bastian; Remy R Coeytaux; Gregory Samsa; Vic Hasselblad; John W Williams; Michael D Musty; Liz Wing; Amy S Kendrick; Gillian D Sanders; David Lobach
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Provider perceptions of the electronic health record incentive programs: a survey of eligible professionals who have and have not attested to meaningful use.

Authors:  Douglas L Weeks; Benjamin J Keeney; Peggy C Evans; Quincy D Moore; Douglas A Conrad
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  A National Report of Nursing Home Quality and Information Technology: Two-Year Trends.

Authors:  Gregory L Alexander; Richard Madsen
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2018 Jul/Sep       Impact factor: 1.597

2.  Characteristics and Disparities among Primary Care Practices in the United States.

Authors:  David Michael Levine; Jeffrey A Linder; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Interoperability: What Is It, How Can We Make It Work for Clinicians, and How Should We Measure It in the Future?

Authors:  David W Bates; Lipika Samal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-11       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Capture of tobacco use among population-based registries: Findings from 10 National Program of Cancer Registries states.

Authors:  David A Siegel; S Jane Henley; Jennifer M Wike; A Blythe Ryerson; Christopher J Johnson; Judy R Rees; Lori A Pollack
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Health Information Technology (HIT) Adaptation: Refocusing on the Journey to Successful HIT Implementation.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Cynthia J Sieck; Jennifer L Hefner; Timothy R Huerta
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-07

Review 6.  Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.

Authors:  Terri Menser; Lauren L Beal; Jacob M Kolman; Stephen L Jones; Aroub Khleif
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.