Literature DB >> 27566851

Efficient edition of the bovine PRNP prion gene in somatic cells and IVF embryos using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

R J Bevacqua1, R Fernandez-Martín1, V Savy1, N G Canel1, M I Gismondi2, W A Kues3, D F Carlson4, S C Fahrenkrug4, H Niemann3, O A Taboga2, S Ferraris5, D F Salamone6.   

Abstract

The recently developed engineered nucleases, such as zinc-finger nucleases, transcription activator-like effector nucleases, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated nuclease (Cas) 9, provide new opportunities for gene editing in a straightforward manner. However, few reports are available regarding CRISPR application and efficiency in cattle. Here, the CRISPR/Cas9 system was used with the aim of inducing knockout and knock-in alleles of the bovine PRNP gene, responsible for mad cow disease, both in bovine fetal fibroblasts and in IVF embryos. Five single-guide RNAs were designed to target 875 bp of PRNP exon 3, and all five were codelivered with Cas9. The feasibility of inducing homologous recombination (HR) was evaluated with a reporter vector carrying EGFP flanked by 1 kbp PRNP regions (pHRegfp). For somatic cells, plasmids coding for Cas9 and for each of the five single-guide RNAs (pCMVCas9 and pSPgRNAs) were transfected under two different conditions (1X and 2X). For IVF zygotes, cytoplasmic injection was conducted with either plasmids or mRNA. For plasmid injection groups, 1 pg pCMVCas9 + 0.1 pg of each pSPgRNA (DNA2X) was used per zygote. In the case of RNA, two amounts (RNA1X and RNA2X) were compared. To assess the occurrence of HR, a group additionally cotransfected or coinjected with pHRegfp plasmid was included. Somatic cell lysates were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction and surveyor assay. In the case of embryos, the in vitro development and the genotype of blastocysts were evaluated by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. In somatic cells, 2X transfection resulted in indels and large deletions of the targeted PRNP region. Regarding embryo injection, higher blastocyst rates were obtained for RNA injected groups (46/103 [44.6%] and 55/116 [47.4%] for RNA1X and RNA2X) than for the DNA2X group (26/140 [18.6%], P < 0.05). In 46% (26/56) of the total sequenced blastocysts, specific gene editing was detected. The total number of genetic modifications (29) was higher than the total number of gene-edited embryos, as three blastocysts from the group RNA2X reported more than one type of modification. The modifications included indels (10/56; 17.9%) and large deletions (19/56; 33.9%). Moreover, it was possible to detect HR in 1/8 (12.5%) embryos treated with RNA2X. These results report that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be applied for site-specific edition of the bovine genome, which could have a great impact on the development of large animals resistant to important zoonotic diseases.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bovine spongiform encephalopathy; Cattle; Engineered nuclease; Gene targeting; Mad cow disease; Ruminant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566851     DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theriogenology        ISSN: 0093-691X            Impact factor:   2.740


  21 in total

1.  A Simple Method To Detect Point Mutations in Aspergillus fumigatus cyp51A Gene Using a Surveyor Nuclease Assay.

Authors:  Teppei Arai; Hidetaka Majima; Akira Watanabe; Katsuhiko Kamei
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Neurotheranostics as personalized medicines.

Authors:  Bhavesh D Kevadiya; Brendan M Ottemann; Midhun Ben Thomas; Insiya Mukadam; Saumya Nigam; JoEllyn McMillan; Santhi Gorantla; Tatiana K Bronich; Benson Edagwa; Howard E Gendelman
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Application of genome editing in farm animals: cattle.

Authors:  Alison L Van Eenennaam
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  A history of genome editing in mammals.

Authors:  Almudena Fernández; Santiago Josa; Lluis Montoliu
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Genome centric engineering using ZFNs, TALENs and CRISPR-Cas9 systems for trait improvement and disease control in Animals.

Authors:  Atif Khurshid Wani; Nahid Akhtar; Reena Singh; Ajit Prakash; Sayed Haidar Abbas Raza; Simona Cavalu; Chirag Chopra; Mahmoud Madkour; Ahmed Elolimy; Nesrein M Hashem
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.459

6.  Comparative aspects of early lineage specification events in mammalian embryos - insights from reverse genetics studies.

Authors:  Kilian Simmet; Valeri Zakhartchenko; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 7.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

8.  Engineering bone phenotypes in domestic animals: Unique resources for enhancing musculoskeletal research.

Authors:  Larry J Suva; Mark E Westhusin; Charles R Long; Dana Gaddy
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  The transformational impact of site-specific DNA modifiers on biomedicine and agriculture.

Authors:  Kathryn Polkoff; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 1.807

10.  Directions and applications of CRISPR technology in livestock research.

Authors:  IsmaeI Lamas-Toranzo; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Eva Pericuesta; Pablo Bermejo-Álvarez
Journal:  Anim Reprod       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.807

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.