| Literature DB >> 27566674 |
Xiaoliang Shao1, Wei Yang1, Xiaonan Shao1, Chun Qiu1, Xiaosong Wang1, Yuetao Wang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of dyslipidemia in China was increased over the last several years. Studies have shown that the activity of aBAT is related to the lipid metabolism. In this study, we analyzed blood lipid level in tumor-free healthy Chinese adults in order to determine the role of aBAT in lipid metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose; Chinese; Dyslipidemia; Positron emission tomography; aBAT
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27566674 PMCID: PMC5000508 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0310-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1(a and b) Distribution of aBAT in one subject included in this study
Baseline characteristics of studied subjects
| Parameters | Subjects |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.8 ± 9.7 |
| Male (%) | 66.4 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.8 ± 3.2 |
| Normal weight (%) | 39.8 |
| Overweight (%) | 45.6 |
| Obesity (%) | 14.6 |
| Current Smoker (%) | 38.4 |
| Current Drinker (%) | 34.3 |
| Diabetes (%) | 12.7 |
| Outdoor temperature (°C) | 21.6 ± 9.1 °C |
| aBAT (%) | 1.81 |
BMI body mass index, aBAT active brown adipose tissue
Normal weight: BMI < 24 kg/m2, Overweight: BMI between 24 and 27.9 kg/m2, Obesity: BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2
Outdoor temperature was the outside temperature of the day when PET/CT scan was performed
Univariate analysis of factors contributing to dyslipidemia
| Dyslipidemia | Normal |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.8 ± 9.4 | 49.9 ± 10.1 | 0.942 |
| Male (%) | 74.2 | 55.9 | <0.001* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.5 ± 2.9 | 23.8 ± 3.2 | <0.001* |
| Normal weight (%) | 30.7 | 52.0 | <0.001* |
| Overweight (%) | 49.9 | 39.9 | |
| Obesity (%) | 19.4 | 8.1 | |
| Current Smoker (%) | 45.7 | 28.4 | <0.001* |
| Current Drinker (%) | 38.2 | 29.1 | 0.011* |
| Diabetes (%) | 15.3 | 9.2 | 0.014* |
| aBAT (%) | 0.2 | 3.9 | <0.001* |
BMI body mass index, aBAT active brown adipose tissue
Normal weight: BMI < 24 kg/m2, Overweight: BMI between 24 and 27.9 kg/m2, Obesity: BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2
*Significant difference
Multivariate and Logistic regression analysis of factors contributing to dyslipidemia
| Variables | Regression coefficient |
| 95 % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | −0.271 | 0.762 | 0.497 ~ 1.170 | 0.215 |
| BMI | 0.162 | 1.175 | 1.112 ~ 1.234 | <0.001* |
| Smoke | 0.521 | 1.684 | 1.134 ~ 2.501 | 0.010* |
| Drink | −0.158 | 0.854 | 0.577 ~ 1.265 | 0.432 |
| Diabetes | 0.236 | 1.266 | 0.769 ~ 2.085 | 0.353 |
| aBAT | −2.575 | 0.076 | 0.010 ~ 0.610 | 0.015* |
OR odds ratio, CI confidence index, aBAT active brown adipose tissue
*Significant difference
Characteristics of subjects in aBAT and control groups
| aBAT group | Control |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 41.9 ± 6.5 | 41.8 ± 6.4 | 0.950 |
| Male /Female | 5/8 | 15/24 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.9 ± 2.6 | 23.7 ± 2.3 | 0.286 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.08 ± 0.59 | 5.45 ± 0.60 | 0.062 |
| Outdoor temperature (°C) | 12.5 ± 7.1 | 12.7 ± 7.3 | 0.947 |
aBAT active brown adipose tissue, BMI body mass index
Outdoor temperature was the outside temperature of the day when PET/CT scan was performed
Fig. 2Comparison of the blood lipid level between aBAT and control groups. Comparison of blood TG between aBAT and control groups (a); Comparison of blood HDL-C between aBAT and control groups (b); Comparison of blood TC between aBAT and control groups (c); Comparison of blood LDL-C between aBAT and control groups (d)