Literature DB >> 27566244

Removing seminal plasma improves bovine sperm sex-sorting.

C B Steinhauser1, J K Graham1, R W Lenz2, G E Seidel1.   

Abstract

Bull ejaculates with sperm concentrations of less than 1 billion sperm sort poorly for sex chromosomes, but whether this is because of the sperm concentration or the concomitant seminal plasma content has not been elucidated. Experiments were conducted to determine why ejaculates with lower sperm concentrations sort poorly and develop a protocol to increase sorting efficiency. In Experiment I, spermatozoa at 160 or 240 × 106 sperm/mL were stained at 49, 65 or 81 μm Hoechst 33342 with 0 or 10% seminal plasma and then sex-sorted. In Experiment II, seminal plasma was adjusted to create samples with sperm concentrations of 0.7, 1.4 and 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL, prior to sex-sorting. In Experiment III, spermatozoa were diluted to 0.7, 1.4 and 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL using TALP containing 0 or 10% seminal plasma prior to sex-sorting and cryopreservation. In Experiment I, the optimal staining combination was 160 × 106 sperm/mL stained with 65 μm Hoechst 33342 and no seminal plasma. In Experiment II, the percentages of membrane-impaired sperm were lower for sample concentrations of 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL (15%) than for samples at 1.4 × 109 (17%) or 0.7 × 109 sperm/mL (18%; p < 0.01). The X sort rate was slower for samples stored at 0.7 × 109 sperm/mL (3.45 × 103 sperm/sec) than for samples stored at 1.4 × 109 and 2.1 × 109 sperm/mL (3.85 and 3.94 × 103 sperm/sec, respectively; p < 0.05). In Experiment III, samples containing 0% seminal plasma had higher percentages of live-oriented cells (54 vs. 50%; p < 0.05), fewer dead sperm (19 vs. 22%; p < 0.01) and higher post-thaw motility (41 vs. 35%; p < 0.05) than samples containing 10% seminal plasma. Ejaculates with high sperm concentrations result in superior sorting because these samples have less seminal plasma during staining than ejaculates with lower initial sperm concentrations as all samples are diluted to 160 × 106 sperm/mL for staining. Therefore, sorting efficiency appears to be affected by seminal plasma concentration, not by the original sperm concentration.
© 2016 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bull sperm; seminal plasma; sex-sorting

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566244     DOI: 10.1111/andr.12245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Andrology        ISSN: 2047-2919            Impact factor:   3.842


  2 in total

1.  Effect of the pH in the enrichment of X or Y sex chromosome-bearing sperm in bovine.

Authors:  Nidhi P Raval; Tejas M Shah; Linz-Buoy George; Chaitanya G Joshi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Bovine sperm-oviduct interactions are characterized by specific sperm behaviour, ultrastructure and tubal reactions which are impacted by sex sorting.

Authors:  Miguel Camara Pirez; Heather Steele; Sven Reese; Sabine Kölle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.