Literature DB >> 27566026

Prognostic factors for disease relapse in patients with neuroendocrine tumours who underwent curative surgery.

A E Slagter1, D Ryder2, B Chakrabarty3, A Lamarca4, R A Hubner5, W Mansoor6, D A O'Reilly7, P E Fulford8, H J Klümpen9, J W Valle10, M G McNamara11.   

Abstract

AIM: Surgery is the only modality of cure in patients diagnosed with neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors associated with disease relapse in patients with NETs treated by potentially-curative surgery.
METHODS: Sequential patients registered in The Christie European NET Society (ENETS) Centre of Excellence, with grade (G)1 or G2 NETs who had undergone curative surgery (February 2002-June 2014) were included. Investigated prognostic factors for relapse were: age, gender, TNM stage, tumour-localisation, functionality, genetic predisposition, presence of multiple NETs, second malignancy, grade (Ki-67-based), presence of vascular and/or perineural invasion, necrosis, surgical margin (R0/R1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation co-morbidity score.
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight patients were identified [median age of 60 years (range 16-89)]. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 43 relapses occurred. The estimated median relapse-free survival (RFS) for the entire cohort was 8.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9-10.0 years). In univariate analysis, primary NET location (p = 0.01), ENETS T-(HR-1.4; 95%-CI 1.0-2.0, p = 0.026), N-(HR-2.0, 95%-CI 1.1-3.9, p = 0.026) and M-stage (HR-2.6, 95%-CI 1.1-6.3, p = 0.052), grade (Ki-67%-based) (HR-2.5; 95%-CI 1.4-4.7; p = 0.003) and perineural invasion (HR-2.1; 95%-CI 1.1-3.9; p = 0.029) were prognostic for relapse. Factors remaining significant after multivariable analysis were tumour size (HR-1.67; 95%-CI 1.04-2.70; p = 0.03), nodal involvement (HR-2.61; 95%-CI 1.17-5.83; p = 0.013) and Ki-67 at the time of diagnosis (HR-1.93; 95%-CI 1.24-3.0; p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Size of tumour, lymph node involvement and Ki-67 were independent prognostic factors for relapse after potentially curative surgery in NET.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuroendocrine tumour; Prognosis; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27566026     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  9 in total

1.  Predictive Value of Chromogranin A and a Pre-Operative Risk Score to Predict Recurrence After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Authors:  Alexander V Fisher; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Victoria R Rendell; Courtney Pokrzywa; Flavio G Rocha; Zaheer S Kanji; George A Poultsides; Eleftherios A Makris; Mary E Dillhoff; Eliza W Beal; Ryan C Fields; Roheena Z Panni; Kamran Idrees; Paula Marincola Smith; Clifford S Cho; Megan V Beems; Shishir K Maithel; Emily R Winslow; Daniel E Abbott; Sharon M Weber
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula M Smith; Cliff Cho; Megan Beems; Carl R Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  A New Preoperative Scoring System for Predicting Aggressiveness of Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

Authors:  Tetsuya Takikawa; Kazuhiro Kikuta; Shin Hamada; Kiyoshi Kume; Shin Miura; Naoki Yoshida; Yu Tanaka; Ryotaro Matsumoto; Mio Ikeda; Fumiya Kataoka; Akira Sasaki; Hidehiro Hayashi; Waku Hatta; Yohei Ogata; Kei Nakagawa; Michiaki Unno; Atsushi Masamune
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03

4.  Enucleation Is a Feasible Procedure for Well-Differentiated pNEN-A Matched Pair Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Nießen; Fabiola A Bechtiger; Ulf Hinz; Magdalena Lewosinska; Franck Billmann; Thilo Hackert; Markus W Büchler; Simon Schimmack
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 5.  Follow-Up Recommendations after Curative Resection of Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumours: Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Angela Lamarca; Hamish Clouston; Jorge Barriuso; Mairéad G McNamara; Melissa Frizziero; Was Mansoor; Richard A Hubner; Prakash Manoharan; Sarah O'Dwyer; Juan W Valle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Prognostic importance of lymph node yield after curative resection of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  Jaseela Chiramel; Rose Almond; Astrid Slagter; Adeel Khan; Xin Wang; Kok Haw Jonathan Lim; Melissa Frizziero; Bipasha Chakrabarty; Annamaria Minicozzi; Angela Lamarca; Wasat Mansoor; Richard A Hubner; Juan William Valle; Mairéad Geraldine McNamara
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-24

7.  Identifying Risk Factors and Patterns for Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Charlotte M Heidsma; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Flavio Rocha; Daniel E Abbott; Ryan Fields; George A Poultsides; Clifford S Cho; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; Zaheer Kanji; Alexander V Fisher; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Eleftherios Makris; Megan Beems; Casper H J van Eijck; Elisabeth J M Nieveen van Dijkum; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Intratumoral Fibrosis and Tumor Growth Pattern as Prognostic Factors in Optimally Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 168 Cases.

Authors:  Deyali Chatterjee; Nikolaos A Trikalinos; Greg A Williams; Jingxia Liu; William G Hawkins; Chet Hammill
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.243

9.  Functionality is not an independent prognostic factor for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Hong-Yu Chen; Ya-Liang Zhou; Yong-Hua Chen; Xing Wang; Hao Zhang; Neng-Wen Ke; Xu-Bao Liu; Chun-Lu Tan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.