Literature DB >> 27565720

Assessment of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Reproducibility of Micro-Ureteroscopy in the Treatment of Distal Ureteral Stones in Women: A Multicenter Prospective Study.

Juan-Pablo Caballero-Romeu1, Juan-Antonio Galán-Llopis2, Daniel Pérez-Fentes3, Alberto Budia-Alba4, Marcos Cepeda-Delgado5, Jose-Luis Palmero-Marti6, Jose-Ramón Cansino-Alcaide7, Pablo Caballero-Pérez8, Gaspar Ibarluzea-Gonzalez9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness, safety, and reproducibility of the micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) in the treatment of distal ureteral stones in women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, prospective observational study was designed and conducted between March and December 2015. We included women having at least one stone in the distal ureter and being a candidate for surgical treatment using the 4.85F sheath of MicroPerc®. Patients with clinical criteria and/or laboratory analysis indicating sepsis or coagulation alteration were excluded.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine women were operated in eight hospitals. The profile of the patients was fairly homogeneous among hospitals. Only differences were found in age, preoperative stent, and the result of the previous urine culture. Immediate stone-free status was achieved in 88.2% and 100% 7 days after the procedure. 97.4% of patients did not present any complication in the postoperative period, with only one case with complication Clavien II. Postureteroscopic Lesion Scale (PULS) in 76.9% of patients did not show any injury, 20.5% had lesions grade 1, and grade 2 lesions 2.6%. As for the reproducibility of m-URS between hospitals, statistical analysis of the results showed differences between all the centers participating in the study.
CONCLUSIONS: m-URS is an effective, safe, and reproducible technique that minimizes surgical aggression to the ureteral anatomy. Satisfactory and comparable results to "conventional" ureteroscopy were obtained in the treatment of distal ureteral stones in women, although clinical trials are needed. The reduction of the ureteral damage may reduce secondary procedures and increase the cost-effectiveness of the procedure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  miniaturization; minimally invasive surgical procedures; reproducibility of results; ureteroscopy; urinary calculi

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565720     DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

1.  Micro-ureteroscopy (m-URS) for treatment of upper ureteral stones in children: A new, different approach.

Authors:  Numan Baydilli; İsmail Selvi; Emre Can Akınsal; Deniz Demirci
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-30

2.  Micro-ureteroscopy vs. ureteroscopy: effects of miniaturization on renal vascularization and intrapelvic pressure.

Authors:  Juan-Pablo Caballero-Romeu; Jua-Antonio Galán-Llopis; Federico Soria; Esther Morcillo-Martín; Pablo Caballero-Pérez; Alejandro Garcia; Julia E De La Cruz-Conty; Jesús Romero-Maroto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Outcomes of ureteroscopy miniaturization on tissue damage and tissue hypoxia in a pig model.

Authors:  Juan P Caballero-Romeu; Juan A Galán-Llopis; Federico Soria; Esther Morcillo-Martín; Pablo Caballero-Pérez; Julia E De La Cruz-Conty; Jesús Romero-Maroto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Micro-Ureteroscopy as a Treatment of Renal Pelvis Lithiasis in Young Children.

Authors:  Alberto Parente; Ruben Ortiz; Beatriz Fernández-Bautista; Laura Burgos; José Maria Angulo
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.