Literature DB >> 27565511

Results of open pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: single centre series and pooled analysis of literature.

Guus W van Lammeren1, Çağdaş Ünlü1, Sjoerd Verschoor1, Eric P van Dongen2, Jan Wille1, Eric Dwm van de Pavoordt1, Debbie Ab de Vries-Werson1, Jean-Paul Pm De Vries1.   

Abstract

Objectives Endovascular treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm has gained terrain over the past decade, despite the substantial need for reinterventions during follow-up. However, open repair is still a well-established treatment option. With the current study we report the results of a consecutive series of elective primary open pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a tertiary vascular referral centre, combined with an overview of current literature and pooled data analysis of perioperative mortality of open and endovascular pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Methods A retrospective analysis of a prospective database of all elective open pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in the St. Antonius Hospital between 2005 and 2014 was performed. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Secondary endpoints were 30-day morbidity, new onset dialysis, reintervention free survival, and overall survival during follow-up. Results Between 2005 and 2014, 214 consecutive patients underwent elective open pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Mean age was 69.8 (±7.1) years, 82.7% (177/214) were men, and mean abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter was 62 (±11) mm. Thirty-day mortality was 3.4%. Thirty-day morbidity was 27.1%, which predominantly consisted of pneumonia (18.7% (40/214)), cardiac events (3.3% (7/214)), and new onset dialysis (2.8% (6/214)). Estimated five-year overall survival rate was 74.2%. 0.9% (2/214) of patients required abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reintervention, and an additional 2.3% (5/214) required surgical repair of an incisional hernia. Pooled analysis of literature revealed a 30-day mortality of 3.0% for open pararenal repair and 1.9% for fenestrated endovascular repair. Conclusion Open pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the era of increasing endovascular options results in acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Mid-term reintervention rate is low compared to fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. Expertise with open repair still remains essential for treatment of pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in the near future, especially for those patients that are declined for endovascular treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pararenal abdominal aortic aneurysm; aneurysm; fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair; open repair

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565511     DOI: 10.1177/1708538116665268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vascular        ISSN: 1708-5381            Impact factor:   1.285


  3 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years.

Authors:  A D Jones; M A Waduud; P Walker; D Stocken; M A Bailey; D J A Scott
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-05-17

2.  Giant Symptomatic Unruptured Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Valentin Titarenko; Anita Beer; Eva Schonefeld-Siepmann; Felix Muschal; Jochen Karsten Beyer
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2022-09-13

3.  Postoperative anemia is a risk factor for acute kidney injury after open aorta and vena cava surgeries.

Authors:  Rui Cui; Fangda Li; Jiang Shao; Yuzhu Wang; Cai Yue; Yuehong Zheng; Xuemei Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.