| Literature DB >> 27565504 |
Kaito Harada1, Yuta Yamada1, Tatsuya Konishi1, Akihito Nagata1, Toshiaki Takezaki1, Satoshi Kaito1, Shuhei Kurosawa1, Masahiro Sakaguchi1, Shunichiro Yasuda1, Kosuke Yoshioka1, Kyoko Watakabe-Inamoto1, Aiko Igarashi1, Yuho Najima1, Takeshi Hagino1, Hideharu Muto1, Takeshi Kobayashi1, Noriko Doki1, Kazuhiko Kakihana1, Hisashi Sakamaki1, Kazuteru Ohashi2.
Abstract
From January 2012 to September 2015, 49 patients received biosimilar filgrastim (BF) after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT, n = 31) or peripheral stem cell transplantation (PBSCT, n = 18) in our institution. To evaluate the clinical impact of BF on transplant outcomes of these patients, we compared hematological recovery, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), transplantation-related mortality (TRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with those of control patients who received originator filgrastim (OF) after BMT (n = 31) or PBSCT (n = 18). All cases were randomly selected from a clinical database in our institution. In both the BMT and PBSCT settings, neutrophil recovery (17 vs. 19 days in BMT; 13 vs. 15 days in PBSCT) and platelet recovery (27 vs. 31 days in BMT; 17 vs. 28 days in PBSCT) were essentially the same between BF and OF. They were also comparable in terms of OS, DFS, TRM, CIR, and the incidence of acute GVHD and chronic GVHD. On multivariate analysis, the use of BF in both BMT and PBSCT was not a significant factor for adverse transplant outcomes. Although BF significantly reduced filgrastim costs in both BMT and PBSCT, total hospitalization costs were not significantly different between BF and OF.Entities:
Keywords: Biosimilar; Filgrastim; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27565504 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-016-2085-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol ISSN: 0925-5710 Impact factor: 2.490