| Literature DB >> 27565418 |
Tomoyuki Okumura1, Hirohumi Kojima2, Takeshi Miwa2, Shinichi Sekine2, Isaya Hashimoto2, Shozo Hojo2, Takuya Nagata2, Yutaka Shimada2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite advances in radical esophagectomies and adjuvant therapy, the postoperative prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients remains poor. The aim of this study was to identify a molecular signature to predict postoperative favorable outcomes in patients with ESCC.Entities:
Keywords: Esophageal cancer; Prognostic marker; Squamous cell carcinoma; Surgery; miRNA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27565418 PMCID: PMC5002115 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-016-0985-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
Clinicopathological characteristics of the 19 patients in the training data set
| Non-relapse | Relapse |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case number | 5 | 14 | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 68.4 ± 10.7 | 61 ± 9.6 | 0.111 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 3 | 14 | 0.012 |
| Female | 2 | 0 | |
| Tumor location | |||
| Upper/middle thoracic | 1 | 7 | 0.244 |
| Lower thoracic | 4 | 7 | |
| Histological grade | |||
| Well/moderate | 4 | 13 | 0.421 |
| Poorly | 1 | 1 | |
| Pathologic tumor depth | |||
| T1-2 | 3 | 3 | 0.111 |
| T3-4 | 2 | 11 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| N0 | 2 | 3 | 0.418 |
| N1-3 | 3 | 11 | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| M0 | 5 | 14 | – |
| M1 | 0 | 0 | |
| TNM stage (IUAC TNM Classification 7th edition) | |||
| 1–2 | 3 | 4 | 0.211 |
| 3–4 | 2 | 10 | |
| Lymphatic vessel invasion | |||
| Negative | 2 | 3 | 0.418 |
| Positive | 3 | 11 | |
| Venous invasion | |||
| Negative | 3 | 4 | 0.211 |
| Positive | 2 | 10 | |
| Curability | |||
| R0 | 5 | 14 | – |
| R1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Preoperative chemotherapy | 0 | 2 | – |
| Preoperative chemo radiation therapy (CRT) | 0 | 1 | |
| Postoperative chemotherapy | 0 | 2 | – |
| Postoperative CRT | 1 | 5 | |
| Observation period (month, mean ± SD) | 138.7 ± 45.1 | 14 ± 9.2 | <0.001 |
| Duration between surgery and tumor relapse | – | 10 ± 8.4 | – |
| Type of tumor relapse | |||
| Liver (H) | 0 | 5 | |
| Lymph node (Ly) | 0 | 2 | |
| Local (L) | 0 | 1 | |
| H + Ly | 0 | 4 | |
| Ly + L | 0 | 2 | |
Clinicopathological characteristics of the 12 patients in the validation set
| Non-relapse | Relapse |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case number | 8 | 4 | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 63.0 ± 10.3 | 66.7 ± 8.0 | 0.425 |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 4 | 4 | 0.08 |
| Female | 4 | 0 | |
| Tumor location | |||
| Upper/middle thoracic | 5 | 2 | 0.67 |
| Lower thoracic | 3 | 2 | |
| Histological grade | |||
| Well/moderate | 7 | 2 | 0.16 |
| Poorly | 1 | 2 | |
| Pathologic tumor depth | |||
| T1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1.00 |
| T3-4 | 6 | 3 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | |||
| N0 | 3 | 1 | 0.66 |
| N1-3 | 5 | 3 | |
| Distant metastasis | |||
| M0 | 8 | 4 | - |
| M1 | 0 | 0 | |
| TNM stage | |||
| 1–2 | 3 | 1 | 0.66 |
| 3–4 | 5 | 3 | |
| Lymphatic vessel invasion | |||
| Negative | 3 | 1 | 0.66 |
| Positive | 5 | 3 | |
| Venous invasion | |||
| Negative | 2 | 1 | 1.00 |
| Positive | 6 | 3 | |
| Curability | |||
| R0 | 8 | 4 | – |
| R1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Preoperative chemotherapy | 5 | 3 | – |
| Preoperative CRT | 0 | 0 | |
| Postoperative chemotherapy | 2 | 3 | – |
| Postoperative CRT | 0 | 0 | |
| Observation period (month, mean ± SD) | 64.6 ± 18.3 | 51.1 ± 33.6 | 0.049 |
| Duration between surgery and tumor relapse | – | 8.8 ± 2.9 | – |
| Type of tumor relapse | |||
| Liver (H) | 0 | 2 | |
| Lymph node (Ly) | 0 | 2 | |
| miR-574-3p (<0.7) | 1 | 3 | 0.029 |
| miR-574-3p (≥0.7) | 7 | 1 | |
| miR-106b (<1.00) | 1 | 1 | 0.576 |
| miR-106b (≥1.00) | 7 | 3 | |
| miR-1303 (<1.20) | 5 | 2 | 0.576 |
| miR-1303 (≥1.20) | 3 | 2 | |
Fig. 1Expression of miRNAs in ESCC. a Twenty miRNAs that were expressed in ESCC tumors with more than a twofold difference compared with corresponding normal counter parts. b Cluster analysis. The diagram shows the results of the hierarchical clustering of miRNAs and 19 samples. Columns: 320 miRNAs that were detected in all 19 cases. Red represents a higher expression level; green represents a lower expression level. Rows: samples. Cases 1–5 (highlighted in red) were non-relapse cases. Cases 6–19 were relapse cases
Expression of miRNAs associated with postoperative tumor relapse
| Non-Relapse ( | Relapse ( |
| Logistic regression analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | SD | Average | SD |
|
| |
| miR-574-3p | 0.87 | 0.18 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| miR-106b | 1.18 | 0.26 | 0.87 | 0.16 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| miR-1303 | 1.11 | 0.17 | 1.53 | 0.24 | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| miR-1203 | 1.34 | 0.70 | 0.73 | 0.24 | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| miR-1909 | 0.92 | 0.17 | 0.71 | 0.13 | 0.009 | 0.016 |
| miR-204 | 1.10 | 0.35 | 0.76 | 0.23 | 0.016 | 0.033 |
| miR-371-3p | 1.27 | 0.31 | 0.94 | 0.25 | 0.021 | 0.019 |
| miR-886-3p | 0.90 | 0.49 | 1.49 | 0.55 | 0.037 | 0.033 |
Fig. 2The relationship between the expression of miRNAs (miR-574-3p, miR-106b, and miR-1303) and patient outcome in the training cohort. a The expression of miR-574-3p, miR-106b, and miR-1303 in non-relapse and relapse groups. b The association between the expression of miRNAs (miR-574-3p, miR-106b, and miR-1303) and patient prognosis
Cut-off value for predicting relapse analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves
| Name | Cut-off | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| miR-574-3p | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.80 |
| miR-106b | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.79 | 0.80 |
| miR-1303 | 1.20 | 0.94 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
Fig. 3The expression of miRNAs (miR-574-3p, miR-106b and miR-1303) in ESCC patients in the validation cohort. a The expression (T/N ratio) of miR-574-3p in frozen samples of surgically removed ESCC specimens detected by RT-PCR. b The expression (T/N ratio) of miR-106b in frozen samples of surgically removed ESCC specimens detected by RT-PCR. c The expression (T/N ratio) of miR-1303 in frozen samples of surgically removed ESCC specimens detected by RT-PCR
Fig. 4The relationship between the expression of miRNAs (miR-574-3p, miR-106b, and miR-1303) and patient outcome in the validation cohort. a The expression of miR-574-3p, miR-106b and miR-1303 in non-relapse and relapse groups. b The association between miR-574-3 expression and patient prognosis. c The association between miR-106b expression and patient prognosis. d The association between miR-1303 expression and patient prognosis