Literature DB >> 27565257

Hormonal contraception and obesity.

Katharine B Simmons1, Alison B Edelman2.   

Abstract

The rising rate of overweight and obesity is a public health crisis in the United States and increasingly around the globe. Rates of contraceptive use are similar among women of all weights, but because contraceptive development studies historically excluded women over 130% of ideal body weight, patients and providers have a gap in understanding of contraceptive efficacy for obese and overweight women. Because of a range of drug metabolism alterations in obesity, there is biologic plausibility for changes in hormonal contraception effectiveness in obese women. However, these pharmacokinetic changes are not linearly related to body mass index or weight, and it is unknown what degree of obesity begins to affect pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamics processes. Overall, most studies of higher quality do not demonstrate a difference in oral contraceptive pill effectiveness in obese compared with non-obese women. However, data are scant for women in the highest categories of obesity, and differences by progestin type are incompletely understood. Effectiveness of most non-oral contraceptives does not seem to be compromised in obesity. Exceptions to this include the combined hormonal patch and oral levonorgestrel emergency contraception, which may have lower rates of effectiveness in obese women. The purpose of this review is to summarize evidence on contraceptive use in women with obesity, including differences in steroid hormone metabolism, contraceptive effectiveness, and safety, compared with women of normal weight or body mass index using the same methods.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; effectiveness; obesity; pharmacokinetics; safety

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565257     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Relationship between patient characteristics and serum etonogestrel concentrations in contraceptive implant users.

Authors:  Aaron Lazorwitz; Christina L Aquilante; Jeanelle Sheeder; Maryam Guiahi; Stephanie Teal
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Increasing body mass index or weight does not appear to influence the association between efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy and implant effectiveness among HIV-positive women in western Kenya.

Authors:  Rena C Patel; Beatrice Jakait; Katherine Thomas; Constantin Yiannoutsos; Maricianah Onono; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Craig R Cohen
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Impact of blood levels of progesterone on the day of ovulation onset on clinical, laboratory and reproductive parameters of young patients undergoing assisted reproduction: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Renata Garcia Olmos Fernandez; Caio Parente Barbosa; Denise Maria Christofolini; Luiz Vinicius de Alcantara Sousa; Renato de Oliveira; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and serum concentrations of progestins used in contraception.

Authors:  Alexis J Bick; Renate Louw-du Toit; Salndave B Skosana; Donita Africander; Janet P Hapgood
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 5.  Women in larger bodies' experiences with contraception: a scoping review.

Authors:  Tierney M Boyce; Elena Neiterman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  Pregnancy Care for Patients With Super Morbid Obesity.

Authors:  Kelsey Olerich; David Soper; Shani Delaney; Mary Sterrett
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.569

7.  Modification of the Associations Between Duration of Oral Contraceptive Use and Ovarian, Endometrial, Breast, and Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Kara A Michels; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Louise A Brinton; Britton Trabert
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

8.  Contraceptive Options Following Gestational Diabetes: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Ashley M Turner; Emily A Donelan; Jessica W Kiley
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Oral Contraceptive Types in Relation to ABO Blood Groups Among Saudi Women of Different Reproductive Age Groups and Impact on Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Abdulrahman B O Mohamed; Nabeel Al-Ama; Huda Al Kreathy; Khalid H B Ahmed; Turki Al Amri; Steve Harakeh; Shaker A Mousa; Bas De Laat
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.