BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity is important for improving and maintaining health, but sedentary behavior is difficult to change. Providing objective, real-time feedback on physical activity with wearable motion-sensing technologies (activity monitors) may be a promising, scalable strategy to increase physical activity or decrease weight. PURPOSE: We synthesized the literature on the use of wearable activity monitors for improving physical activity and weight-related outcomes and evaluated moderating factors that may have an impact on effectiveness. METHODS: We searched five databases from January 2000 to January 2015 for peer-reviewed, English-language randomized controlled trials among adults. Random-effects models were used to produce standardized mean differences (SMDs) for physical activity outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for weight outcomes. Heterogeneity was measured with I 2. RESULTS: Fourteen trials (2972 total participants) met eligibility criteria; accelerometers were used in all trials. Twelve trials examined accelerometer interventions for increasing physical activity. A small significant effect was found for increasing physical activity (SMD 0.26; 95 % CI 0.04 to 0.49; I 2 = 64.7 %). Intervention duration was the only moderator found to significantly explain high heterogeneity for physical activity. Eleven trials examined the effects of accelerometer interventions on weight. Pooled estimates showed a small significant effect for weight loss (MD -1.65 kg; 95 % CI -3.03 to -0.28; I 2 = 81 %), and no moderators were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometers demonstrated small positive effects on physical activity and weight loss. The small sample sizes with moderate to high heterogeneity in the current studies limit the conclusions that may be drawn. Future studies should focus on how best to integrate accelerometers with other strategies to increase physical activity and weight loss.
BACKGROUND: Regular physical activity is important for improving and maintaining health, but sedentary behavior is difficult to change. Providing objective, real-time feedback on physical activity with wearable motion-sensing technologies (activity monitors) may be a promising, scalable strategy to increase physical activity or decrease weight. PURPOSE: We synthesized the literature on the use of wearable activity monitors for improving physical activity and weight-related outcomes and evaluated moderating factors that may have an impact on effectiveness. METHODS: We searched five databases from January 2000 to January 2015 for peer-reviewed, English-language randomized controlled trials among adults. Random-effects models were used to produce standardized mean differences (SMDs) for physical activity outcomes and mean differences (MDs) for weight outcomes. Heterogeneity was measured with I 2. RESULTS: Fourteen trials (2972 total participants) met eligibility criteria; accelerometers were used in all trials. Twelve trials examined accelerometer interventions for increasing physical activity. A small significant effect was found for increasing physical activity (SMD 0.26; 95 % CI 0.04 to 0.49; I 2 = 64.7 %). Intervention duration was the only moderator found to significantly explain high heterogeneity for physical activity. Eleven trials examined the effects of accelerometer interventions on weight. Pooled estimates showed a small significant effect for weight loss (MD -1.65 kg; 95 % CI -3.03 to -0.28; I 2 = 81 %), and no moderators were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerometers demonstrated small positive effects on physical activity and weight loss. The small sample sizes with moderate to high heterogeneity in the current studies limit the conclusions that may be drawn. Future studies should focus on how best to integrate accelerometers with other strategies to increase physical activity and weight loss.
Entities:
Keywords:
Accelerometers; Physical activity; Weight loss
Authors: Bess H Marcus; David M Williams; Patricia M Dubbert; James F Sallis; Abby C King; Antronette K Yancey; Barry A Franklin; David Buchner; Stephen R Daniels; Randal P Claytor Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-12-04 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Brian M Tyo; Eugene C Fitzhugh; David R Bassett; Dinesh John; Yuri Feito; Dixie L Thompson Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Anouk W Vaes; Amy Cheung; Maryam Atakhorrami; Miriam T J Groenen; Oliver Amft; Frits M E Franssen; Emiel F M Wouters; Martijn A Spruit Journal: Ann Med Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 4.709
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Caroline R Richardson; Tiffany L Newton; Jobby J Abraham; Ananda Sen; Masahito Jimbo; Ann M Swartz Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Karita Reijonsaari; Aki Vehtari; Olli-Pekka Kahilakoski; Willem van Mechelen; Timo Aro; Simo Taimela Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Carolien A Wijsman; Rudi Gj Westendorp; Evert Alm Verhagen; Michael Catt; P Eline Slagboom; Anton Jm de Craen; Karen Broekhuizen; Willem van Mechelen; Diana van Heemst; Frans van der Ouderaa; Simon P Mooijaart Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-11-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Barbara J Nicklas; Jill E Gaukstern; Kristen M Beavers; Jill C Newman; Xiaoyan Leng; W Jack Rejeski Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jessica L Montoya; Catherine M Jankowski; Kelly K O'Brien; Allison R Webel; Krisann K Oursler; Brook L Henry; David J Moore; Kristine M Erlandson Journal: AIDS Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Mindy M Pike; Aseel Alsouqi; Samuel A E Headley; Katherine Tuttle; Elizabeth Elspeth Evans; Charles M Milch; Kelsey Anne Moody; Michael Germain; Thomas G Stewart; Loren Lipworth; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen Journal: Kidney Int Rep Date: 2020-06-15
Authors: Eva van der Meij; Hidde P van der Ploeg; Baukje van den Heuvel; Boudewijn J Dwars; W J H Jeroen Meijerink; H Jaap Bonjer; Judith A F Huirne; Johannes R Anema Journal: BMC Surg Date: 2017-05-12 Impact factor: 2.102
Authors: Jemma Hawkins; Joanna M Charles; Michelle Edwards; Britt Hallingberg; Linda McConnon; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Russell Jago; Mark Kelson; Kelly Morgan; Simon Murphy; Emily J Oliver; Sharon A Simpson; Graham Moore Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-03-29 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Lorraine R Buis; Felicia A McCant; Jennifer M Gierisch; Lori A Bastian; Eugene Z Oddone; Caroline R Richardson; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Richard Evans; Gwendolyn Hooks; Reema Kadri; Courtney White-Clark; Laura J Damschroder Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2019-01-29