Literature DB >> 27565040

A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.

Xiaomeng Li1, Xuedong Yan2, Jiawei Wu3, Essam Radwan4, Yuting Zhang5.   

Abstract

Driver's collision avoidance performance has a direct link to the collision risk and crash severity. Previous studies demonstrated that the distracted driving, such as using a cell phone while driving, disrupted the driver's performance on road. This study aimed to investigate the manner and extent to which cell phone use and driver's gender affected driving performance and collision risk in a rear-end collision avoidance process. Forty-two licensed drivers completed the driving simulation experiment in three phone use conditions: no phone use, hands-free, and hand-held, in which the drivers drove in a car-following situation with potential rear-end collision risks caused by the leading vehicle's sudden deceleration. Based on the experiment data, a rear-end collision risk assessment model was developed to assess the influence of cell phone use and driver's gender. The cell phone use and driver's gender were found to be significant factors that affected the braking performances in the rear-end collision avoidance process, including the brake reaction time, the deceleration adjusting time and the maximum deceleration rate. The minimum headway distance between the leading vehicle and the simulator during the rear-end collision avoidance process was the final output variable, which could be used to measure the rear-end collision risk and judge whether a collision occurred. The results showed that although cell phone use drivers took some compensatory behaviors in the collision avoidance process to reduce the mental workload, the collision risk in cell phone use conditions was still higher than that without the phone use. More importantly, the results proved that the hands-free condition did not eliminate the safety problem associated with distracted driving because it impaired the driving performance in the same way as much as the use of hand-held phones. In addition, the gender effect indicated that although female drivers had longer reaction time than male drivers in critical situation, they were more quickly in braking with larger maximum deceleration rate, and they tended to keep a larger safety margin with the leading vehicle compared to male drivers. The findings shed some light on the further development of advanced collision avoidance technologies and the targeted intervention strategies about cell phone use while driving.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cell phone use; Collision avoidance; Driver’s gender; Driving simulator; Rear-end collision risk assessment model

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27565040     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  4 in total

1.  Red-Light-Running Crashes' Classification, Comparison, and Risk Analysis Based on General Estimates System (GES) Crash Database.

Authors:  Yuting Zhang; Xuedong Yan; Xiaomeng Li; Jiawei Wu; Vinayak V Dixit
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.

Authors:  Răzvan Gabriel Boboc; Gheorghe Daniel Voinea; Ioana-Diana Buzdugan; Csaba Antonya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  What is the difference between perceived and actual risk of distracted driving? A field study on a real highway.

Authors:  Zhen Li; Chang Wang; Rui Fu; Qinyu Sun; Hongjia Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Reaction time and brake pedal force after total knee replacement: timeframe for return to car driving.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirschbaum; Michael Fuchs; Marion Otto; Clemens Gwinner; Carsten Perka; Ufuk Sentürk; Tilman Pfitzner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.