Daphné Lizee1, Giuseppe Campagna2, Andrea Morciano2,3, Giovanni Panico2, Alfredo Ercoli4, Pierre Gadonneix5. 1. Department of Urology, L'Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Roma, Italy. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pia Fondazione "Cardinale G. Panico", Tricase, Italy. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy. 5. Department of Visceral and Gynecologic Surgery, Diaconesses Hospital, Paris, France.
Abstract
AIMS: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) for pelvic prolapse is a complex procedure, characterized by an anterior mesh suspension to the sacral promontory and a posterior tension-free mesh fixation. METHODS: Totals of 150 age-BMI and parity matched consecutive POP patients were selected from our Diaconesses Hospital database among women who underwent a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) plus sacral colpopexy (LSC) from June 2005 to March 2010. We analyzed two group of LSC populations, according to different tension-free apical fixation of the posterior mesh: Promontory (P) group and Utero-Sacral (US) group. Studied endpoints were the anatomical and functional results linked to these different tension-free posterior mesh placements. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. No differences in terms of anatomical and functional outcomes were observed between the groups. Pelvic organ mobility at rest versus under Valsalva highlighted a significant reduction of median differential vaginal apex only in the P population (preoperative: 30 mm and 32 mm; postoperative: 8 mm and 24 mm; for P and US, respectively; P < 0.01). No differences were found in terms of intra- or post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Uterosacral tension-free fixation of posterior mesh during LSC could be considered a simple procedure and guarantees a more physiological movement of the pelvic organs if compared with promontory suspension.
AIMS: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) for pelvic prolapse is a complex procedure, characterized by an anterior mesh suspension to the sacral promontory and a posterior tension-free mesh fixation. METHODS: Totals of 150 age-BMI and parity matched consecutive POP patients were selected from our Diaconesses Hospital database among women who underwent a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) plus sacral colpopexy (LSC) from June 2005 to March 2010. We analyzed two group of LSC populations, according to different tension-free apical fixation of the posterior mesh: Promontory (P) group and Utero-Sacral (US) group. Studied endpoints were the anatomical and functional results linked to these different tension-free posterior mesh placements. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. No differences in terms of anatomical and functional outcomes were observed between the groups. Pelvic organ mobility at rest versus under Valsalva highlighted a significant reduction of median differential vaginal apex only in the P population (preoperative: 30 mm and 32 mm; postoperative: 8 mm and 24 mm; for P and US, respectively; P < 0.01). No differences were found in terms of intra- or post-operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Uterosacral tension-free fixation of posterior mesh during LSC could be considered a simple procedure and guarantees a more physiological movement of the pelvic organs if compared with promontory suspension.
Authors: Femke van Zanten; Jan J van Iersel; Tim J C Paulides; Paul M Verheijen; Ivo A M J Broeders; Esther C J Consten; Egbert Lenters; Steven E Schraffordt Koops Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-06-20 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Giuseppe Campagna; Lorenzo Vacca; Giovanni Panico; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Daniela Caramazza; Riccardo Zaccoletti; Monia Marturano; Roberta Granese; Martina Arcieri; Stefano Cianci; Giovanni Scambia; Alfredo Ercoli Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Date: 2022-03-04
Authors: Giuseppe Campagna; Lorenzo Vacca; Giovanni Panico; Valerio Rumolo; Daniela Caramazza; Andrea Lombisani; Cristiano Rossitto; Pierre Gadonneix; Giovanni Scambia; Alfredo Ercoli Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 2.894