Literature DB >> 27564785

The application of adult traumatic brain injury models in a pediatric cohort.

Adam M H Young1, Mathew R Guilfoyle1, Helen Fernandes1, Matthew R Garnett1, Shruti Agrawal2, Peter J Hutchinson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE There is increasing interest in the use of predictive models of outcome in adult head injury. Two international models have been identified to be reliable modalities for predicting outcome: the Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) model, and the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of randomized Controlled Trials in TBI (IMPACT) model. However, these models are designed only to identify outcomes in adult populations. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of Addenbrooke's Hospital between January 2009 and December 2013. The individual risk of 14-day mortality was calculated using the CRASH-Basic and -CT models, and the risk of 6-month mortality calculated using the IMPACT-Core and -Extended (including CT findings) models. Model accuracy was determined by standardized mortality ratio (SMtR; observed/expected deaths), discrimination was evaluated as the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC), and calibration assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow χ2 test. RESULTS Ninety-four patients with an average age of 7.3 years were admitted to the PICU with a TBI. The mortality rate was 12.7% at 14 days and at 6 months. For the CRASH-Basic model, the SMtR was 1.42 and both calibration (χ2 = 6.1, p = 0.64) and discrimination (AUROC = 0.92) were good. For the IMPACT-Core model, the SMtR was 1.03 and the model was also well calibrated (χ2 = 8.99, p = 0.34) and had good discrimination (AUROC = 0.85). Poor outcome was observed in 17% of the cohort and identified with the CRASH-Basic and IMPACT-Core models to varying degrees: standardized morbidity ratio = 0.89 vs 0.67, respectively; calibration = 6.5 (χ2) and 0.59 (p value) versus 8.52 (χ2) and 0.38 (p value), respectively; and discrimination (AUROC) = 0.92 versus 0.83, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Adult head injury models may be applied with sufficient accuracy to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality in pediatric TBI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUROC = area under the receiver operating curve; CRASH = Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury; GCS = Glasgow Coma Scale; GOS = Glasgow Outcome Scale; IMPACT = International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of randomized Controlled Trials in TBI; IQR = interquartile range; PICU = pediatric intensive care unit; SMbR = standardized morbidity ratio; SMtR = standardized mortality ratio; TBI = traumatic brain injury; acute; brain; injury; prediction; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27564785     DOI: 10.3171/2016.5.PEDS15427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr        ISSN: 1933-0707            Impact factor:   2.375


  3 in total

1.  Ability of the PILOT score to predict 6-month functional outcome in pediatric patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Brian F Flaherty; Margaret L Jackson; Charles S Cox; Amy Clark; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Richard Holubkov; Kevin R Moore; Rajan P Patel; Heather T Keenan
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.545

Review 2.  Radiological Correlates of Raised Intracranial Pressure in Children: A Review.

Authors:  Saeed Kayhanian; Adam M H Young; Rory J Piper; Joseph Donnelly; Daniel Scoffings; Matthew R Garnett; Helen M Fernandes; Peter Smielewski; Marek Czosnyka; Peter J Hutchinson; Shruti Agrawal
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.418

3.  Neurologic Outcomes Following Care in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Sherrill D Caprarola; Sapna R Kudchadkar; Melania M Bembea
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.