Literature DB >> 27564561

A Comparison of Regional Versus General Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies.

Andres Zorrilla-Vaca1, Ryan J Healy, Marek A Mirski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia (GA) is commonly used for lumbar spine surgery. The advantages of regional anesthesia (RA) for lumbar spine surgery, as compared with GA, remain unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the impact of the type of anesthesia on intraoperative events, incidence of postoperative complications, and recovery time of patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.
METHODS: Major databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, ISI Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials comparing regional versus GA for lumbar spine surgery. Study-level characteristics, intraoperative events, and postoperative complications were extracted from the articles. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect models.
RESULTS: Fifteen randomized clinical trials comprising 961 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The use of RA for lumbar spine surgery was significantly associated with lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting at 24 hours (risk ratio [RR]=0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.23-0.77, P=0.005), as well as lower length of stay (standardized mean difference [SMD]=-0.73; 95% CI=-1.17 to -0.29, P=0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (SMD=-1.24; 95% CI=-2.27 to -0.21, P=0.02). There was no statistically significant association with lower pain score (SMD=-0.47; 95% CI=-2.13 to 1.19, P=0.58), lower incidence of urinary retention (RR=1.16; 95% CI=0.73-1.86, P=0.53) or analgesic requirement (RR=0.87; 95% CI=0.64-1.18, P=0.37).
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, RA has several advantageous characteristics, including lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, length of stay, and blood loss. Further well-designed studies with more sample size are needed to clarify the associations with possible neurological complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27564561     DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  6 in total

1.  Laser-assisted endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for failed back surgery syndrome in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yong Ahn; Han Joong Keum; Sang Ha Shin; Jung Ju Choi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Evaluation of thoracolumbar interfascial plane block for postoperative analgesia after herniated lumbar disc surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mona Ahmed Ammar; Mohamed Taeimah
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

3.  Spinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery correlates with fewer total medications and less frequent use of vasoactive agents: A single center experience.

Authors:  Hao Deng; Jean-Valery Coumans; Richard Anderson; Timothy T Houle; Robert A Peterfreund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Regional Anesthesia for Lumbar Spine Surgery: Can It Be a Standard in the Future?

Authors:  Jae-Koo Lee; Jong Hwa Park; Seung-Jae Hyun; Daniel Hodel; Oliver N Hausmann
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-12-31

5.  Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane Block on the Analgesic Requirements in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ezzat Eltaher; Nihal Nasr; Mohamed E Abuelnaga; Yassmin Elgawish
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.133

6.  Introduction to systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  EunJin Ahn; Hyun Kang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-04-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.