Literature DB >> 27564215

Thermal sensation models: a systematic comparison.

B Koelblen1,2, A Psikuta2, A Bogdan1, S Annaheim2, R M Rossi2.   

Abstract

Thermal sensation models, capable of predicting human's perception of thermal surroundings, are commonly used to assess given indoor conditions. These models differ in many aspects, such as the number and type of input conditions, the range of conditions in which the models can be applied, and the complexity of equations. Moreover, the models are associated with various thermal sensation scales. In this study, a systematic comparison of seven existing thermal sensation models has been performed with regard to exposures including various air temperatures, clothing thermal insulation, and metabolic rate values after a careful investigation of the models' range of applicability. Thermo-physiological data needed as input for some of the models were obtained from a mathematical model for human physiological responses. The comparison showed differences between models' predictions for the analyzed conditions, mostly higher than typical intersubject differences in votes. Therefore, it can be concluded that the choice of model strongly influences the assessment of indoor spaces. The issue of comparing different thermal sensation scales has also been discussed.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) scale; Bedford scale; standards; subjective judgement; thermal sensation; thermal sensation models

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27564215     DOI: 10.1111/ina.12329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  3 in total

1.  Local air gap thickness and contact area models for realistic simulation of human thermo-physiological response.

Authors:  Agnes Psikuta; Emel Mert; Simon Annaheim; René M Rossi
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Determination of car seat contact area for personalised thermal sensation modelling.

Authors:  Miloš Fojtlín; Agnes Psikuta; Róbert Toma; Jan Fišer; Miroslav Jícha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Menthol Mouth Rinsing Is More Than Just a Mouth Wash-Swilling of Menthol to Improve Physiological Performance.

Authors:  Erica H Gavel; Kierstyn V Hawke; David J Bentley; Heather M Logan-Sprenger
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-07-07
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.