Literature DB >> 27564141

Employing dynamical computational models for personalizing cancer immunotherapy.

Zvia Agur1, Karin Halevi-Tobias1, Yuri Kogan1, Ofer Shlagman1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recently, cancer immunotherapy has shown considerable success, but due to the complexity of the immune-cancer interactions, clinical outcomes vary largely between patients. A possible approach to overcome this difficulty may be to develop new methodologies for personal predictions of therapy outcomes, by the integration of patient data with dynamical mathematical models of the drug-affected pathophysiological processes. AREAS COVERED: This review unfolds the story of mathematical modeling in cancer immunotherapy, and examines the feasibility of using these models for immunotherapy personalization. The reviewed studies suggest that response to immunotherapy can be improved by patient-specific regimens, which can be worked out by personalized mathematical models. The studies further indicate that personalized models can be constructed and validated relatively early in treatment. EXPERT OPINION: The suggested methodology has the potential to raise the overall efficacy of the developed immunotherapy. If implemented already during drug development it may increase the prospects of the technology being approved for clinical use. However, schedule personalization, per se, does not comply with the current, 'one size fits all,' paradigm of clinical trials. It is worthwhile considering adjustment of the current paradigm to involve personally tailored immunotherapy regimens.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mathematical model; adoptive cell transfer; cancer vaccination; immune checkpoint inhibitor; immunotherapy personalization; model validation

Year:  2016        PMID: 27564141     DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2016.1223622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Biol Ther        ISSN: 1471-2598            Impact factor:   4.388


  9 in total

1.  Sequential, Multiple Assignment, Randomized Trial Designs in Immuno-oncology Research.

Authors:  Kelley M Kidwell; Michael A Postow; Katherine S Panageas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  From Fitting the Average to Fitting the Individual: A Cautionary Tale for Mathematical Modelers.

Authors:  Michael C Luo; Elpiniki Nikolopoulou; Jana L Gevertz
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  A computational multiscale agent-based model for simulating spatio-temporal tumour immune response to PD1 and PDL1 inhibition.

Authors:  Chang Gong; Oleg Milberg; Bing Wang; Paolo Vicini; Rajesh Narwal; Lorin Roskos; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Alleviation of exhaustion-induced immunosuppression and sepsis by immune checkpoint blockers sequentially administered with antibiotics-analysis of a new mathematical model.

Authors:  Avi Gillis; Michael Beil; Karin Halevi-Tobias; Peter Vernon van Heerden; Sigal Sviri; Zvia Agur
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2019-06-11

5.  Predicting response to pembrolizumab in metastatic melanoma by a new personalization algorithm.

Authors:  Neta Tsur; Yuri Kogan; Evgenia Avizov-Khodak; Désirée Vaeth; Nils Vogler; Jochen Utikal; Michal Lotem; Zvia Agur
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 5.531

6.  Mathematical model of a personalized neoantigen cancer vaccine and the human immune system.

Authors:  Marisabel Rodriguez Messan; Osman N Yogurtcu; Joseph R McGill; Ujwani Nukala; Zuben E Sauna; Hong Yang
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  A high OXPHOS CD8 T cell subset is predictive of immunotherapy resistance in melanoma patients.

Authors:  Chuan Li; Yee Peng Phoon; Keaton Karlinsey; Ye F Tian; Samjhana Thapaliya; Angkana Thongkum; Lili Qu; Alyssa Joyce Matz; Mark Cameron; Cheryl Cameron; Antoine Menoret; Pauline Funchain; Jung-Min Song; C Marcela Diaz-Montero; Banumathi Tamilselvan; Jackelyn B Golden; Michael Cartwright; Annabelle Rodriguez; Christopher Bonin; Anthony Vella; Beiyan Zhou; Brian R Gastman
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 17.579

8.  Validation of a Mathematical Model Describing the Dynamics of Chemotherapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia In Vivo.

Authors:  Ekaterina Guzev; Suchita Suryakant Jadhav; Eleonora Ela Hezkiy; Michael Y Sherman; Michael A Firer; Svetlana Bunimovich-Mendrazitsky
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 7.666

9.  Mathematical Prostate Cancer Evolution: Effect of Immunotherapy Based on Controlled Vaccination Strategy.

Authors:  Dorota Ba Dziul; Paweł Jakubczyk; Levan Chotorlishvili; Zaza Toklikishvilie; Julian Traciak; Joanna Jakubowicz-Gil; Sylwia Chmiel-Szajner
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 2.238

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.