Yingding Xu1, R Brooke Jeffrey1, Lewis K Shin2, Michael A DiMaio3, Eric W Olcott4. 1. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA, Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA. 4. Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California USA, Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California USA eolcott@stanford.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that continuous intramural vascular signal measuring at least 3 mm on color Doppler imaging is highly specific for appendicitis in patients with diagnostically borderline-size appendices. METHODS: Two blinded observers independently reviewed color Doppler images of the appendix in 94 consecutive patients who had undergone sonography for suspected appendicitis and whose appendices were of diagnostically borderline size (6-8 mm maximum outer diameter). Intramural vascular flow on color Doppler images was classified as absent, type 1 (only punctate and dispersed signal), or type 2 (continuous linear or curvilinear signal measuring at least 3.0 mm in long- or short-axis views). Histopathologic examination and clinical follow-up served as reference standards. Proportions were assessed by the exact binomial test. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients, 33 (35.1%) had type 1 flow (of whom 5 [15.2%] had appendicitis); 23 (24.5%) had type 2 flow (of whom 20 [87.0%] had appendicitis); and 38 (40.4%) had absent flow (of whom 10 [26.3%] had appendicitis). The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio of type 2 flow as an indicator of appendicitis were 57.1%, 94.9%, and 24.9 (P< .001), respectively; the corresponding values for type 1 flow as an indicator of normal appendices were and 47.5%, 85.7%, and 5.4 (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intramural linear or curvilinear signal measuring at least 3 mm on color Doppler imaging is a highly specific, although relatively insensitive, sign of acute appendicitis in noncompressible appendices of diagnostically borderline size (6-8 mm).
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypothesis that continuous intramural vascular signal measuring at least 3 mm on color Doppler imaging is highly specific for appendicitis in patients with diagnostically borderline-size appendices. METHODS: Two blinded observers independently reviewed color Doppler images of the appendix in 94 consecutive patients who had undergone sonography for suspected appendicitis and whose appendices were of diagnostically borderline size (6-8 mm maximum outer diameter). Intramural vascular flow on color Doppler images was classified as absent, type 1 (only punctate and dispersed signal), or type 2 (continuous linear or curvilinear signal measuring at least 3.0 mm in long- or short-axis views). Histopathologic examination and clinical follow-up served as reference standards. Proportions were assessed by the exact binomial test. RESULTS: Of the 94 patients, 33 (35.1%) had type 1 flow (of whom 5 [15.2%] had appendicitis); 23 (24.5%) had type 2 flow (of whom 20 [87.0%] had appendicitis); and 38 (40.4%) had absent flow (of whom 10 [26.3%] had appendicitis). The sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratio of type 2 flow as an indicator of appendicitis were 57.1%, 94.9%, and 24.9 (P< .001), respectively; the corresponding values for type 1 flow as an indicator of normal appendices were and 47.5%, 85.7%, and 5.4 (P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous intramural linear or curvilinear signal measuring at least 3 mm on color Doppler imaging is a highly specific, although relatively insensitive, sign of acute appendicitis in noncompressible appendices of diagnostically borderline size (6-8 mm).
Entities:
Keywords:
appendicitis; color Doppler sonography; diagnostic imaging; gastrointestinal ultrasound; sonography
Authors: Francesco Esposito; Marco Di Serafino; Carmela Mercogliano; Dolores Ferrara; Norberto Vezzali; Giovanni Di Nardo; Luigi Martemucci; Gianfranco Vallone; Massimo Zeccolini Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2019-02-13