Literature DB >> 27562969

Evaluation of a Newly Formulated Enzyme Immunoassay for the Detection of Hydrocodone and Hydromorphone in Pain Management Compliance Testing.

Renata Nascimento1, Alphonse Poklis2, Carl E Wolf2.   

Abstract

A new Hydrocodone Enzyme Immunoassay (HEIA; Lin-Zhi International, Inc.) was evaluated for the detection of hydrocodone and its main metabolite, hydromorphone. All specimens were tested with two different cutoff calibrators, 100 and 300 ng/mL, on an ARCHITECT Plus c4000 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. Controls containing -25% (negative control) and +25% (positive control) of the cutoff calibrators and a drug-free control were analyzed with each batch. All 1,025 urine specimens were previously analyzed by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS-MS) for opiates. Approximately, 33% (337/1,019) of the specimens yielded positive results by the HEIA assay at a cutoff concentration of 100 ng/mL and 19% (190/1,025) yielded positive results at the 300 ng/mL cutoff concentration. Of these presumptive positive specimens, UPLC-MS-MS confirmed the presence of hydrocodone and/or hydromorphone >100 ng/mL in 241 specimens and >300 ng/mL in 162 specimens, for each respective cutoff. With the 100 ng/mL cutoff, the HEIA demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.959, a specificity of 0.846 and an overall agreement with the UPLC-MS-MS of 87%. At 300 ng/mL cutoff, the HEIA demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.880, a specificity of 0.966 and an overall agreement of UPLC-MS-MS results of 95%. The Lin-Zhi HEIA 100 ng/mL cutoff assay demonstrated sensitivity for the detection of hydrocodone and hydromorphone in urine. The 300 ng/mL cutoff was less sensitive, but more selective, and should be part of an initial immunoassay screen, particularly in pain management compliance testing.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562969      PMCID: PMC5048711          DOI: 10.1093/jat/bkw080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  5 in total

1.  Comparative metabolism of hydrocodone in man, rat, guinea pig, rabbit, and dog.

Authors:  E J Cone; W D Darwin; C W Gorodetzky; T Tan
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  A discussion of EMIT d.a.u. assays.

Authors:  J E Gorsky
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 3.  Urine drug testing in chronic pain.

Authors:  Paul J Christo; Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Xiulu Ruan; Michael Bottros; Hans Hansen; Daneshvari R Solanki; Arthur E Jordan; James Colson
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Sensitivity of an opiate immunoassay for detecting hydrocodone and hydromorphone in urine from a clinical population: analysis of subthreshold results.

Authors:  Roger L Bertholf; Laura M Johannsen; Gary M Reisfield
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  Urinary hydrocodone and metabolite distributions in pain patients.

Authors:  Neveen H Barakat; Rabia S Atayee; Brookie M Best; Joseph D Ma
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.367

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Machine learning for infection risk prediction in postoperative patients with non-mechanical ventilation and intravenous neurotargeted drugs.

Authors:  Yi Du; Haipeng Shi; Xiaojing Yang; Weidong Wu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Midazolam for Sedation in Patients with Intubation after Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Li Wang; Tiejun Zhang; Lili Huang; Wei Peng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.