Literature DB >> 27562676

Multisensory integration of redundant trisensory stimulation.

Carl Erick Hagmann1, Natalie Russo2.   

Abstract

Integration of sensory information across modalities can confer behavioral advantages by decreasing perceptual ambiguity, increasing reaction time, and increasing detection accuracy relative to unisensory stimuli. We asked how combinations of auditory, visual, and somatosensory events alter response time. Participants detected stimulation on one side of space (right or left) while ignoring stimulation on the other side of space. There were seven types of suprathreshold stimuli: auditory (tones from speakers), visual (sinusoidal contrast gratings), somatosensory (fingertip vibrations), audio-visual, somato-visual, audio-somatosensory, and audio-somato-visual. Response enhancement and race model analysis confirmed that bisensory and trisensory trials enhanced response time relative to unisensory trials. Exploratory analysis of individual differences in intersensory facilitation revealed that participants fit into one of two groups: those who benefitted from trisensory information and those who did not.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory; Focused attention; Multisensory; Somatosensory; Visual

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562676      PMCID: PMC5564512          DOI: 10.3758/s13414-016-1192-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  48 in total

1.  A permutation test for the race model inequality.

Authors:  Matthias Gondan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-02

Review 2.  On the use of superadditivity as a metric for characterizing multisensory integration in functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Thomas J Perrault; Terrence R Stanford; Mark T Wallace; Barry E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Testing the race model inequality: an algorithm and computer programs.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Jeff Miller; Hannes Schröter
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

5.  The principle of inverse effectiveness in multisensory integration: some statistical considerations.

Authors:  Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

7.  A source of error in attempts to distinguish coactivation from separate activation in the perception of redundant targets.

Authors:  C W Eriksen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-08

8.  Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions.

Authors:  Ryan A Stevenson; Raquel K Zemtsov; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Divided attention: evidence for coactivation with redundant signals.

Authors:  J Miller
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Cross-modal selective attention: on the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus of visual attention.

Authors:  C Spence; J Ranson; J Driver
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Trimodal Race Model Inequalities in Multisensory Integration: I. Basics.

Authors:  Hans Colonius; Felix Hermann Wolff; Adele Diederich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-07-11

2.  Temporal Audiovisual Motion Prediction in 2D- vs. 3D-Environments.

Authors:  Sandra Dittrich; Tömme Noesselt
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.