Literature DB >> 27562621

Validation of Clinical Scoring Systems ART and ABCR after Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Roman Kloeckner1, Michael B Pitton2, Christoph Dueber2, Irene Schmidtmann3, Peter R Galle4, Sandra Koch5, Marcus A Wörns5, Arndt Weinmann5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To perform an external validation of the Assessment for Retreatment with Transarterial Chemoembolization (ART) and α-fetoprotein (AFP), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC), Child-Pugh, and response (ABCR) scores and to compare them in terms of prognostic power.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2000 to 2015, 871 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent transarterial chemoembolization at a tertiary referral hospital, and 176 met all inclusion and exclusion criteria for both scores and were analyzed. Nineteen percent (n = 34) had BCLC stage A disease and 81% had stage B disease. Thirty-nine patients (22%) presented with elevated AFP levels. Overall survival was calculated. Scores were validated and compared with a Harrell C-index, integrated Brier score (IBS), and prediction error curves.
RESULTS: Before the second chemoembolization procedure, 22 patients (12%) showed an increase of 1 point in Child-Pugh score and 51 patients (22%) had an increase of ≥ 2 points. Thirty-one patients (23%) showed a > 25% increase in aspartate aminotransferase level, and 114 (65%) showed a response to treatment. Consequently, 127 patients (72%) had a low ART score and 49 (28%) had a high ART score. One hundred fifty-eight patients (90%) had a low ABCR score, whereas 18 (10%) had a high ABCR score. Low and high ART score groups had median survival durations of 20.8 and 15.3 mo, respectively. Harrell C-indexes were 0.572 and 0.608, and IBSs were 0.135 and 0.128, for ART and ABCR, respectively. For both scores, an increase in Child-Pugh score ≥ 2 points and a radiologic response were significantly associated with survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Both scores were of limited predictive value, and neither was sufficient to support clear-cut clinical decisions. Further effort is necessary to determine criteria for making valid clinical predictions.
Copyright © 2017 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562621     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Utility of Albumin Bilirubin Grade as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Transarterial Chemoembolization: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gauri Mishra; Ammar Majeed; Anouk Dev; Guy D Eslick; David J Pinato; Hirofumi Izumoto; Atsushi Hiraoka; Teh-Ia Huo; Po-Hong Liu; Philip J Johnson; Stuart K Roberts
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2022-05-30

Review 2.  Patient Selection for Transarterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Importance of Benefit/Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Fabio Piscaglia; Sadahisa Ogasawara
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 11.740

3.  Validation of the SNACOR clinical scoring system after transarterial chemoembolisation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Arndt Weinmann; Irene Schmidtmann; Sandra Koch; Sebastian Schotten; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Michael Bernhard Pitton; Christoph Dueber; Peter Robert Galle; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The Brier score does not evaluate the clinical utility of diagnostic tests or prediction models.

Authors:  Melissa Assel; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Diagn Progn Res       Date:  2017-12-02

5.  Tumor Marker-Based Definition of the Transarterial Chemoembolization-Refractoriness in Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multi-Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jun Sik Yoon; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Hwi Young Kim; Cheol-Hyung Lee; Sun Woong Kim; Hyo Young Lee; Joon Yeul Nam; Young Chang; Yun Bin Lee; Eun Ju Cho; Su Jong Yu; Hyo-Cheol Kim; Jin Wook Chung; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Risk prediction in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Direct comparison of the MEGNA score and the 8th edition of the UICC/AJCC Cancer staging system.

Authors:  Felix Hahn; Lukas Müller; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Sebastian Schotten; Christoph Düber; Jan B Hinrichs; Sabine K Maschke; Peter R Galle; Fabian Bartsch; Hauke Lang; Arndt Weinmann; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictive scores for hepatocellular carcinoma: a race with no winners?

Authors:  Raffaella Tortora; Marco Guarracino; Giovan Giuseppe Di Costanzo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10

8.  Development of a computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of transarterial chemoembolization refractoriness in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiang-Ke Niu; Xiao-Feng He
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Quantitative washout in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing TACE: an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis?

Authors:  Lukas Müller; Felix Hahn; Florian Jungmann; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Fabian Stoehr; Moritz C Halfmann; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Jan Hinrichs; Timo A Auer; Christoph Düber; Roman Kloeckner
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 10.  Recent Updates of Transarterial Chemoembolilzation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Young Chang; Soung Won Jeong; Jae Young Jang; Yong Jae Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.