Literature DB >> 27562492

Erythroleukemia shares biological features and outcome with myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts: a rationale for its inclusion into future classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Xavier Calvo1, Leonor Arenillas1, Elisa Luño2, Leonor Senent3, Montserrat Arnan4, Fernando Ramos5, María Teresa Ardanaz6, Carme Pedro7, Mar Tormo8, Julia Montoro9, María Díez-Campelo10, Beatriz Arrizabalaga11, Blanca Xicoy12, Santiago Bonanad13, Andrés Jerez14, Benet Nomdedeu15, Ana Ferrer1, Guillermo F Sanz3, Lourdes Florensa1.   

Abstract

Erythroleukemia was considered an acute myeloid leukemia in the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and is defined by the presence of ≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts, having <20% bone marrow blasts from total nucleated cells but ≥20% bone marrow myeloblasts from nonerythroid cells. Erythroleukemia shares clinicopathologic features with myelodysplastic syndromes, especially with erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes (≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts). The upcoming WHO revision proposes to eliminate the nonerythroid blast cell count rule and to move erythroleukemia patients into the appropriate myelodysplastic syndrome category on the basis of the absolute blast cell count. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with de novo erythroleukemia and compared their clinico-biological features and outcome with those of de novo myelodysplastic syndromes, focusing on erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes. Median overall survival of 405 erythroid-predominant myelodysplastic syndromes without excess blasts was significantly longer than that observed in 57 erythroid-predominant refractory anemias with excess blasts-1 and in 59 erythroleukemias, but no significant difference was observed between erythroid-predominant refractory anemias with excess blasts-1 and erythroleukemias. In this subset of patients with ≥50% bone marrow erythroblasts and excess blasts, the presence of a high-risk karyotype defined by the International Prognostic Scoring System or by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System was the main prognostic factor. In the same way, the survival of 459 refractory anemias with excess blasts-2, independently of having ≥20% bone marrow blasts from nonerythroid cells or not, was almost identical to the observed in 59 erythroleukemias. Interestingly, 11 low-blast count erythroleukemias with 5 to <10% bone marrow blasts from total nucleated cells showed similar survival than the rest of erythroleukemias. Our data suggest that de novo erythroleukemia is in the spectrum of myelodysplastic syndromes with excess blasts and support its inclusion into future classifications of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562492     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  19 in total

Review 1.  Acute myeloid leukaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes with 50% or greater erythroblasts: a diagnostic conundrum.

Authors:  Eric Wong; Surender Juneja
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.306

2.  Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group.

Authors:  J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Comparison of genetic and clinical aspects in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes all with more than 50% of bone marrow erythropoietic cells.

Authors:  Ulrike Bacher; Claudia Haferlach; Tamara Alpermann; Wolfgang Kern; Susanne Schnittger; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 9.941

4.  Morphologic, immunologic and cytogenetic studies in erythroleukaemia: evidence for multilineage involvement and identification of two distinct cytogenetic-clinicopathological types.

Authors:  A Cuneo; A Van Orshoven; J L Michaux; M Boogaerts; A Louwagie; C Doyen; P Dal Cin; F Fagioli; G Castoldi; H Van den Berghe
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.998

5.  Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 6.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Attilio Orazi; Robert Hasserjian; Jürgen Thiele; Michael J Borowitz; Michelle M Le Beau; Clara D Bloomfield; Mario Cazzola; James W Vardiman
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Proposals for the classification of the acute leukaemias. French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group.

Authors:  J M Bennett; D Catovsky; M T Daniel; G Flandrin; D A Galton; H R Gralnick; C Sultan
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  Reclassifying myelodysplastic syndromes: what's where in the new WHO and why.

Authors:  Daniel A Arber; Robert P Hasserjian
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2015

9.  Adult acute erythroleukemia: an analysis of 91 patients treated at a single institution.

Authors:  F P S Santos; S Faderl; G Garcia-Manero; C Koller; M Beran; S O'Brien; S Pierce; E J Freireich; X Huang; G Borthakur; C Bueso-Ramos; M de Lima; M Keating; J Cortes; H Kantarjian; F Ravandi
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 11.528

10.  Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with erythroid predominance exhibits clinical and molecular characteristics that differ from other types of AML.

Authors:  Zhuang Zuo; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Zhao Chen; Dingsheng Liu; Carlos E Bueso-Ramos; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Sa A Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Study of clinical, haematological and cytogenetic profile of patients with acute erythroid leukaemia.

Authors:  Jacob Abraham Linu; Ms Namratha Udupa; D S Madhumathi; K C Lakshmaiah; K Govind Babu; D Lokanatha; Mc Suresh Babu; K N Lokesh; L K Rajeev; A H Rudresha
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-01-10

2.  Revisiting gene mutations and prognosis of ex-M6a-acute erythroid leukemia with regard to the new WHO classification.

Authors:  N Cervera; N Carbuccia; M-J Mozziconacci; J Adélaïde; S Garnier; A Guille; A Murati; M Chaffanet; N Vey; D Birnbaum; V Gelsi-Boyer
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 11.037

3.  Clinical Outcomes of 217 Patients with Acute Erythroleukemia According to Treatment Type and Line: A Retrospective Multinational Study.

Authors:  Antonio M Almeida; Thomas Prebet; Raphael Itzykson; Fernando Ramos; Haifa Al-Ali; Jamile Shammo; Ricardo Pinto; Luca Maurillo; Jaime Wetzel; Pellegrino Musto; Arjan A Van De Loosdrecht; Maria Joao Costa; Susana Esteves; Sonja Burgstaller; Reinhard Stauder; Eva M Autzinger; Alois Lang; Peter Krippl; Dietmar Geissler; Jose Francisco Falantes; Carmen Pedro; Joan Bargay; Guillermo Deben; Ana Garrido; Santiago Bonanad; Maria Diez-Campelo; Sylvain Thepot; Lionel Ades; Wolfgang R Sperr; Peter Valent; Pierre Fenaux; Mikkael A Sekeres; Richard Greil; Lisa Pleyer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  The uniqueness of morphological features of pure erythroid leukemia in myeloid neoplasm with erythroid predominance: A reassessment using criteria revised in the 2016 World Health Organization classification.

Authors:  Po-Shen Ko; Yao-Chung Liu; Chiu-Mei Yeh; Jyh-Pyng Gau; Yuan-Bin Yu; Liang-Tsai Hsiao; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Po-Min Chen; Tzeon-Jye Chiou; Chia-Jen Liu; Jin-Hwang Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.