Literature DB >> 27562202

Risk Stratification by Urinary Prostate Cancer Gene 3 Testing Before Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Among Men With No History of Biopsy.

Michael Fenstermaker1, Neil Mendhiratta1, Marc A Bjurlin2, Xiaosong Meng2, Andrew B Rosenkrantz3, Richard Huang2, Fang-Ming Deng4, Ming Zhou4, William C Huang2, Herbert Lepor2, Samir S Taneja5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a combination of prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suspicion score (mSS) could further optimize detection of prostate cancer on MRI fusion-targeted biopsy (MRF-TB) among men with no history of biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in this study 187 men presenting to our institution between June 2012 and August 2014 who underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and PCA3 before MRF-TB. Biopsy results, stratified by biopsy indication and PCA3 score, were recorded. Receiver operating characteristics curves and multivariable logistic regressions were used to model the association of PCA3 and mSS with cancer detection on MRF-TB.
RESULTS: PCA3 is associated with cancer detection on MRF-TB for men with no prior biopsies (area under the curve: 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.76). Using a cutoff of ≥35, PCA3 was associated with cancer risk among men with mSS 2-3 (P = .004), but not among those with mSS 4-5 (P = .340). The interaction of PCA3 and mSS demonstrated significantly higher discrimination for cancer than mSS alone (area under the curve: 0.83 vs 0.79, P = .0434).
CONCLUSION: Urinary PCA3 is associated with mSS and the detection of cancer on MRF-TB for men with no prior biopsies. PCA3 notably demonstrates a high negative predictive value among mSS 2-3. However, in the case of high-suspicion mpMRI, PCA3 is not associated with cancer detection on MRF-TB, adding little to cancer diagnosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the utility of PCA3 in predicting cancer among men with normal mpMRI.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562202     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Application of fused image in detecting abnormalities of temporomandibular joint.

Authors:  Ruo-Han Ma; Gang Li; Yi Sun; Juan-Hong Meng; Yan-Ping Zhao; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  The role of prostate cancer biomarkers in undiagnosed men.

Authors:  Hasan Dani; Stacy Loeb
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Whom to Biopsy: Prediagnostic Risk Stratification with Biomarkers, Nomograms, and Risk Calculators.

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Hasan Dani
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Reference-free transcriptome exploration reveals novel RNAs for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Marina Pinskaya; Zohra Saci; Mélina Gallopin; Marc Gabriel; Ha Tn Nguyen; Virginie Firlej; Marc Descrimes; Audrey Rapinat; David Gentien; Alexandre de la Taille; Arturo Londoño-Vallejo; Yves Allory; Daniel Gautheret; Antonin Morillon
Journal:  Life Sci Alliance       Date:  2019-11-15

Review 5.  Prostate Cancer Biomarker Development: National Cancer Institute's Early Detection Research Network Prostate Cancer Collaborative Group Review.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Robin J Leach; Martin G Sanda; Oliver J Semmes
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 6.  Active Surveillance in Prostate Cancer: Role of Available Biomarkers in Daily Practice.

Authors:  Belén Pastor-Navarro; José Rubio-Briones; Ángel Borque-Fernando; Luis M Esteban; Jose Luis Dominguez-Escrig; José Antonio López-Guerrero
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Low PCA3 expression is a marker of poor differentiation in localized prostate tumors: exploratory analysis from 12,076 patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Alshalalfa; Gerald W Verhaegh; Ewan A Gibb; Maria Santiago-Jiménez; Nicholas Erho; Jennifer Jordan; Kasra Yousefi; Lucia L C Lam; Tyler Kolisnik; Jijumon Chelissery; Roland Seiler; Ashley E Ross; R Jeffrey Karnes; Edward M Schaeffer; Tamara T Lotan; Robert B Den; Stephen J Freedland; Elai Davicioni; Eric A Klein; Jack A Schalken
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-07

Review 8.  MRI-fusion biopsy: the contemporary experience.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06

Review 9.  Clinical Applications of Molecular Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Felipe Couñago; Fernando López-Campos; Ana Aurora Díaz-Gavela; Elena Almagro; Esaú Fenández-Pascual; Iván Henríquez; Rebeca Lozano; Estefanía Linares Espinós; Alfonso Gómez-Iturriaga; Guillermo de Velasco; Luis Miguel Quintana Franco; Ignacio Rodríguez-Melcón; José López-Torrecilla; Daniel E Spratt; Luis Leonardo Guerrero; Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca; Elia Del Cerro
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Genetic Landscape of Prostate Cancer Conspicuity on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review and Bioinformatic Analysis.

Authors:  Joseph M Norris; Benjamin S Simpson; Marina A Parry; Clare Allen; Rhys Ball; Alex Freeman; Daniel Kelly; Hyung L Kim; Alex Kirkham; Sungyong You; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Hayley C Whitaker; Mark Emberton
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2020-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.