Literature DB >> 27562104

The use and reliability of SymNose for quantitative measurement of the nose and lip in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

David Mosmuller1, Robin Tan2, Frans Mulder3, Yara Bachour4, Henrica de Vet5, Peter Don Griot6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: It is essential to have a reliable assessment method in order to compare the results of cleft lip and palate surgery. In this study the computer-based program SymNose, a method for quantitative assessment of the nose and lip, will be assessed on usability and reliability.
METHODS: The symmetry of the nose and lip was measured twice in 50 six-year-old complete and incomplete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by four observers. For the frontal view the asymmetry level of the nose and upper lip were evaluated and for the basal view the asymmetry level of the nose and nostrils were evaluated.
RESULTS: A mean inter-observer reliability when tracing each image once or twice was 0.70 and 0.75, respectively. Tracing the photographs with 2 observers and 4 observers gave a mean inter-observer score of 0.86 and 0.92, respectively. The mean intra-observer reliability varied between 0.80 and 0.84.
CONCLUSIONS: SymNose is a practical and reliable tool for the retrospective assessment of large caseloads of 2D photographs of cleft patients for research purposes. Moderate to high single inter-observer reliability was found. For future research with SymNose reliable outcomes can be achieved by using the average outcomes of single tracings of two observers.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Cleft lip and palate; Nasolabial appearance; SymNose; Symmetry

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27562104     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  7 in total

1.  Effectiveness of presurgical nasoalveolar molding therapy on unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity.

Authors:  Nao Kinouchi; Shinya Horiuchi; Akihiro Yasue; Yuko Kuroda; Nobuhiko Kawai; Keiichiro Watanabe; Takashi Izawa; Ichiro Hashimoto; Ali H Hassan; Eiji Tanaka
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.484

2.  Defining the Aesthetic Range of Normal Symmetry for Lip and Nose Features in 5-Year-Old Children Using the Computer-Based Program SymNose.

Authors:  Nirvana S S Kornmann; Robin A Tan; Frans J Mulder; Joseph T Hardwicke; Bruce M Richard; Brian B Pigott; Ronald W Pigott
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-11-21

3.  Preoperative analysis of upper lip in patients with upper cleft lip/palate before lip repair.

Authors:  Junyan Jing; Xiaoxuan Chen; Bing Shi; Yufeng Wang; Yongbin Mou; Yong Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

4.  Comparative clinical evaluation of modified and conventional Grayson's presurgical nasoalveolar molding technique in infants with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Seema Thakur; C Jishad; Parul Singhal; Deepak Chauhan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-08-18

5.  Deeper Understanding of Appearance in Orofacial Clefts: A Structural Equation Model of the CLEFT-Q Appearance Scales.

Authors:  Conrad J Harrison; Chris J Sidey-Gibbons; Anne F Klassen; Karen W Y Wong Riff; Dominic Furniss; Marc C Swan; Jeremy N Rodrigues
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-09-17

6.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of Facial Morphology and Movements Using a Wearable Helmet.

Authors:  Marina Guihard; Jean-Michel Gracies; Marjolaine Baude
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The possibilities of a portable low-budget three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry system in neonates: a prospective growth analysis and analysis of accuracy.

Authors:  Lucas M Ritschl; Maximilian Roth; Andreas M Fichter; Fabienna Mittermeier; Bettina Kuschel; Klaus-Dietrich Wolff; Florian D Grill; Denys J Loeffelbein
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.151

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.