BACKGROUND: The optimal preoperative α-blockade strategy is debated for patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytomas. We evaluated the impact of selective versus non-selective α-blockade on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients having laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytomas from 2001 to 2015. As a marker of overall intraoperative hemodynamics, we combined systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 200, SBP < 80, SBP < 80 and >200, pulse > 120, vasopressor infusion, and vasodilator infusion into a single variable. Similarly, the combination of vasopressor infusion in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission provided an overview of postoperative support. RESULTS: We identified 52 patients undergoing unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Selective α-blockade (i.e. doxazosin) was performed in 35 % (n = 18) of patients, and non-selective blockade with phenoxybenzamine was performed in 65 % (n = 34) of patients. Demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Patients blocked selectively were more likely to have an SBP < 80 (67 %) than those blocked with phenoxybenzamine (35 %) (p = 0.03), but we found no significant difference in overall intraoperative hemodynamics between patients blocked selectively and non-selectively (p = 0.09). However, postoperatively, patients blocked selectively were more likely to require additional support with vasopressor infusions in the PACU or ICU admission (p = 0.02). Hospital stay and complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is safe regardless of the preoperative α-blockade strategy employed, but patients blocked selectively may have a higher incidence of transient hypotension during surgery and a greater need for postoperative support. These differences did not result in longer hospital stay or increased complications.
BACKGROUND: The optimal preoperative α-blockade strategy is debated for patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytomas. We evaluated the impact of selective versus non-selective α-blockade on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We identified patients having laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytomas from 2001 to 2015. As a marker of overall intraoperative hemodynamics, we combined systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 200, SBP < 80, SBP < 80 and >200, pulse > 120, vasopressor infusion, and vasodilator infusion into a single variable. Similarly, the combination of vasopressor infusion in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission provided an overview of postoperative support. RESULTS: We identified 52 patients undergoing unilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Selective α-blockade (i.e. doxazosin) was performed in 35 % (n = 18) of patients, and non-selective blockade with phenoxybenzamine was performed in 65 % (n = 34) of patients. Demographics and tumor characteristics were similar between groups. Patients blocked selectively were more likely to have an SBP < 80 (67 %) than those blocked with phenoxybenzamine (35 %) (p = 0.03), but we found no significant difference in overall intraoperative hemodynamics between patients blocked selectively and non-selectively (p = 0.09). However, postoperatively, patients blocked selectively were more likely to require additional support with vasopressor infusions in the PACU or ICU admission (p = 0.02). Hospital stay and complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma is safe regardless of the preoperative α-blockade strategy employed, but patients blocked selectively may have a higher incidence of transient hypotension during surgery and a greater need for postoperative support. These differences did not result in longer hospital stay or increased complications.
Authors: Laurent Brunaud; Phi-Linh Nguyen-Thi; Eric Mirallie; Marco Raffaelli; Menno Vriens; Pierre-Etienne Theveniaud; Myriam Boutami; Brendan M Finnerty; Wessel M C M Vorselaars; Inne Borel Rinkes; Rocco Bellantone; Celestino Lombardi; Thomas Fahey; Rasa Zarnegar; Laurent Bresler Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-06-20 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Toby N Weingarten; Juan P Cata; Jerome F O'Hara; David J Prybilla; Tasha L Pike; Geoffrey B Thompson; Clive S Grant; David O Warner; Emmanuel Bravo; Juraj Sprung Journal: Urology Date: 2010-05-23 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Karel Pacak; Graeme Eisenhofer; Håkan Ahlman; Stefan R Bornstein; Anne-Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo; Ashley B Grossman; Noriko Kimura; Massimo Mannelli; Anne Marie McNicol; Arthur S Tischler Journal: Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab Date: 2007-02
Authors: Colleen M Kiernan; Liping Du; Xi Chen; James T Broome; Chanjuan Shi; Mary F Peters; Carmen C Solorzano Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: H Bruynzeel; R A Feelders; T H N Groenland; A H van den Meiracker; C H J van Eijck; J F Lange; W W de Herder; G Kazemier Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2009-12-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Joseph M Pappachan; Nyo Nyo Tun; Ganesan Arunagirinathan; Ravinder Sodi; Fahmy W F Hanna Journal: Curr Hypertens Rep Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 5.369