| Literature DB >> 27561649 |
Xiaoya Guo1, Jian Zhu2, Akiko Maehara3, David Monoly4, Habib Samady4, Liang Wang5, Kristen L Billiar6, Jie Zheng7, Chun Yang8, Gary S Mintz3, Don P Giddens4,9, Dalin Tang10,11.
Abstract
Computational models have been used to calculate plaque stress and strain for plaque progression and rupture investigations. An intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-based modeling approach is proposed to quantify in vivo vessel material properties for more accurate stress/strain calculations. In vivo Cine IVUS and VH-IVUS coronary plaque data were acquired from one patient with informed consent obtained. Cine IVUS data and 3D thin-slice models with axial stretch were used to determine patient-specific vessel material properties. Twenty full 3D fluid-structure interaction models with ex vivo and in vivo material properties and various axial and circumferential shrink combinations were constructed to investigate the material stiffness impact on stress/strain calculations. The approximate circumferential Young's modulus over stretch ratio interval [1.0, 1.1] for an ex vivo human plaque sample and two slices (S6 and S18) from our IVUS data were 1631, 641, and 346 kPa, respectively. Average lumen stress/strain values from models using ex vivo, S6 and S18 materials with 5 % axial shrink and proper circumferential shrink were 72.76, 81.37, 101.84 kPa and 0.0668, 0.1046, and 0.1489, respectively. The average cap strain values from S18 material models were 150-180 % higher than those from the ex vivo material models. The corresponding percentages for the average cap stress values were 50-75 %. Dropping axial and circumferential shrink consideration led to stress and strain over-estimations. In vivo vessel material properties may be considerably softer than those from ex vivo data. Material stiffness variations may cause 50-75 % stress and 150-180 % strain variations.Entities:
Keywords: Artery material properties; FSI; IVUS; Patient-specific model; Vulnerable plaque
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27561649 PMCID: PMC5288279 DOI: 10.1007/s10237-016-0820-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomech Model Mechanobiol ISSN: 1617-7940